Stabæk vs Åsane: match statistics
Stabæk vs Åsane: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Stabæk play Åsane in First Division (Norway). The match date is 12 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 4:0.
Current form
Stabæk: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Åsane: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Stabæk scores 2.29 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Åsane scores 1.43 and concedes 2.14. League average: 3.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Stabæk 57%, Åsane 43%. Over 2.5: Stabæk 71%, Åsane 64%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots and style
Stabæk has higher xG: 1.94 vs 1.24. Stabæk: 17.1 shots per match, Åsane: 9.6.
Match halves
Stabæk: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.21. Åsane: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Stabæk: 46-60 (9 goals). Åsane: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.75 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Match description
Stabæk is a slight favorite: in the last 5 matches they scored 7 goals (1.4 per game) versus Åsane’s 4 goals (0.8 per game) and sit 12th in the table compared to the visitors’ 13th. Both teams have significant defensive issues — Stabæk conceded 14 goals in the last 5 fixtures (2.8 per game), Åsane 10 (2.0 per game), a combined 24 goals conceded, indicating an open match. Form aligns with these figures: Stabæk have a run of 'wllll' (1 win, 4 losses) and 0.6 PPG over the last 5, while Åsane are 'ldldl' (0 wins, 2 draws, 3 losses) and 0.4 PPG. Stabæk’s key advantages are superior offensive efficiency (7 vs 4) and higher PPG (0.6 vs 0.4), whereas Åsane’s advantage is a slightly better defense in this period (10 conceded vs 14). Therefore I forecast a home win (50%), a draw at 30%, and an away win at 20%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Stabæk | Åsane | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Stabæk is 67% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Stabæk · 1.2 pts / match - Åsane
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Stabæk is 60% better for: goals scored per match.
2.29 goals / match - Stabæk · 1.43 goals / match - Åsane
Stabæk is 88% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.14 goals / match - Stabæk · 2.14 goals / match - Åsane
Stabæk scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while Åsane keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).
Åsane scores in 64% of matches (9 of 14 matches), while Stabæk keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Stabæk
Over / Under — Åsane
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Stabæk is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.57 pts / match - Stabæk · 1.07 pts / match - Åsane
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Stabæk - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Åsane - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Stabæk
Åsane
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Stabæk | Liga | Åsane | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.43 | 3.75 | ▼ 3.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 57% | 60% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 71% | 73% | ▼ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 21% | • 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 77% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 86% | 88% | ▼ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Stabæk 1 - 1 - 0 Åsane. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Stabæk vs Åsane?
The First Division match finished Stabæk 4:0 Åsane. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Stabæk and Åsane?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Stabæk won 1, Åsane won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Stabæk vs Åsane?
Stabæk score 2.29 goals per game on average and Åsane 1.43. The First Division average is 3.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Stabæk's matches and 43% of Åsane's.
What form are Stabæk and Åsane in?
Over the last 5 games Stabæk have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Åsane 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Stabæk vs Åsane?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.