Poland - 3 Liga Group 4Data current as of 23 July 2026

Stal Kraśnik vs Siarka Tarnobrzeg: match statistics

Stal Kraśnik vs Siarka Tarnobrzeg: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Stal Kraśnik play Siarka Tarnobrzeg in 3 Liga Group 4 (Poland). The match date is 13 May 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Stal Kraśnik: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Siarka Tarnobrzeg: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Stal Kraśnik scores 1.27 and concedes 1.48 goals per match. Siarka Tarnobrzeg scores 1.74 and concedes 1.53. League average: 3.13 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Stal Kraśnik 55%, Siarka Tarnobrzeg 65%. Over 2.5: Stal Kraśnik 48%, Siarka Tarnobrzeg 65%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Stal Kraśnik has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.36. Stal Kraśnik: 4.8 shots per match, Siarka Tarnobrzeg: 4.9.

Match halves

Stal Kraśnik: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.64. Siarka Tarnobrzeg: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Stal Kraśnik: 0-15 (10 goals). Siarka Tarnobrzeg: 0-15 (21 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3 Liga Group 4: 3.13 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Stal Kraśnik holds the edge in recent form and chance creation: 2 wins in the last 5 matches and an average of 1.4 points per game, with 6 goals scored versus Siarka’s 4 in the same period. At home Stal produces on average 10.4 shots, 3.8 on target and xG 1.24, while Siarka away records 8.86 shots, 3.29 on target and xG 1.15, indicating more opportunities for the hosts. Conversely, Siarka has a superior season-long offensive record (51 goals vs 35 for Stal) and higher shot conversion on the road (13% vs 10%), plus fewer defeats this season (10 vs 17), so they can finish chances. Stal’s defense is vulnerable — hosts concede 1.67 goals at home on average and have 0% clean sheets, while Siarka concede 1.4 away with 20% clean sheets, pointing to an open, high-scoring game. Considering Stal’s better recent form and greater chance volume but Siarka’s season advantages, I predict a narrow home victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
-1Shots-1
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
-1Shots on target-1
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
0xG0
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
-1Corners-1
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
0Dangerous attacks0
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
-1Fouls-1
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
-1Cards-1
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
1.27Goals scored / match1.74
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
1.48Goals conceded / match1.53
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
21%Average possession27%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
1.24Shots on target / match1.94
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

4.79Shots per match4.94
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
1.24Shots on target1.94
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
26.6%Shot conversion35.1%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
21%Possession27%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
1.4xG for1.36
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
1.53xG against1.6
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg

Shooting quality

Stal Kraśnik: Counter-attackingSiarka Tarnobrzeg: Counter-attacking
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
Accuracy (shots on target)26%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.290.28
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.020.90

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Stal Kraśnik is 1000% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Stal Kraśnik · 0.2 pts / match - Siarka Tarnobrzeg

Stal Kraśnik
WDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
27% W21% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-17
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-4-7
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Siarka Tarnobrzeg
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
32% W29% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-13
1.26 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-6-6
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.92BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Siarka Tarnobrzeg is 37% better for: goals scored per match.

1.27 goals / match - Stal Kraśnik · 1.74 goals / match - Siarka Tarnobrzeg

Stal Kraśnik scoring profile: strong

Stal Kraśnik scores in 64% of matches (21 of 33 matches), while Siarka Tarnobrzeg keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 34 matches).

Siarka Tarnobrzeg scoring profile: very strong

Siarka Tarnobrzeg scores in 76% of matches (26 of 34 matches), while Stal Kraśnik keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 33 matches).

42Goals scored (season)59
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
49Goals conceded (season)52
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
2.76Average goals in match3.26
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
9Goals scored (last 5)8
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
3Goals conceded (last 5)13
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal76%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
36%2 goals47%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
18%3 goals21%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
6%4 goals15%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal79%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
42%2 goals50%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
6%3 goals12%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
6%4 goals6%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

65%
Siarka Tarnobrzeg - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.22 of 34 matches
59%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time15%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
9%BTTS in both halves3%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
27%Scored in both halves15%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS59%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
60%BTTS - last 580%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Siarka Tarnobrzeg is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.15 pts / match - Stal Kraśnik · 1.44 pts / match - Siarka Tarnobrzeg

Stal Kraśnik - half-time state
21% leading52% draw27% trailing
Siarka Tarnobrzeg - half-time state
32% leading47% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.15Points per match (1st half)1.44
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.85
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
0.61Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
1.18Average goals (1st half)1.29
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
52%Clean sheet before half-time68%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
64%No goal before half-time56%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)0.91
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
1.18Average goals (2nd half)1.35
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
55%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg
48%No goal after half-time68%
Stal KraśnikSiarka Tarnobrzeg

Stal Kraśnik - second-half results

27% W52% R21% P
38
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Siarka Tarnobrzeg - second-half results

21% W29% R50% P
49
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Stal Kraśnik - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Siarka Tarnobrzeg - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.00
Goals scored / match1.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.6
Average goals in match2.41.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+2-7
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Stal Kraśnik
ScoredConceded
10
18
0-15
4
7
16-30
7
6
31-45
7
4
46-60
6
5
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (10 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Siarka Tarnobrzeg
ScoredConceded
21
11
0-15
9
5
16-30
11
7
31-45
3
13
46-60
8
3
61-75
7
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (21 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.01
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-67%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Stal Kraśnik

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Siarka Tarnobrzeg

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 36% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 4).

Teams vs league

Stal KraśnikLigaSiarka Tarnobrzeg
Average goals in match 2.763.13 3.26
Both teams scored 55%59% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%59% 65%
Clean sheets 9%23% 21%
Goal before half-time 64%57% 62%
Goal after half-time 70%61% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.13
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.70
Home goals / match
1.43
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Stal Kraśnik 0 - 0 - 1 Siarka Tarnobrzeg. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Siarka Tarnobrzeg
1 : 0
Stal Kraśnik

FAQ

What was the result of Stal Kraśnik vs Siarka Tarnobrzeg?

The 3 Liga Group 4 match finished Stal Kraśnik 1:1 Siarka Tarnobrzeg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Stal Kraśnik vs Siarka Tarnobrzeg?

Stal Kraśnik score 1.27 goals per game on average and Siarka Tarnobrzeg 1.74. The 3 Liga Group 4 average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Stal Kraśnik's matches and 65% of Siarka Tarnobrzeg's.

What form are Stal Kraśnik and Siarka Tarnobrzeg in?

Over the last 5 games Stal Kraśnik have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Siarka Tarnobrzeg 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Stal Kraśnik vs Siarka Tarnobrzeg?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.