Stal Kraśnik vs Sparta KW: match statistics
Stal Kraśnik holds a clear advantage over Sparta KW in this encounter. Despite their poor recent form (5 consecutive losses), the hosts boast a solid home record with a 36% win rate and an average of 1.73 goals per match. Sparta KW exhibits disastrous away form – 0% away wins, 91% losses, scoring a mere 0.45 goals on average per match while conceding 3.36. The goal difference is drastic: the visitors stand at -32 in away fixtures. A key factor is efficiency – Sparta fails to score in 73% of their away matches, while Stal has only 27% such games at home. All indicators, including xG (1.31 vs 0.82) and average possession (52% vs 46%), point to the hosts' superiority, who should leverage home conditions to end their negative streak.
Stal Kraśnik vs Sparta KW: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Stal Kraśnik played against Sparta KW in 3 Liga Group 4 (Poland). The game was played on March 28, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Stal Kraśnik has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Sparta KW has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Stal Kraśnik scores 1.27 goals per game and allows 1.73. Sparta KW scores 0.87 and allows 3.22. Games in this league average 3.17 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 55% of Stal Kraśnik's games and 35% of Sparta KW's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 65%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Stal Kraśnik has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 0.95 per game. Stal Kraśnik takes 4.7 shots per game, while Sparta KW takes 2.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Stal Kraśnik leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.68 goals per game after halftime. Sparta KW leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.39 after halftime.
When the teams score
Stal Kraśnik's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). For Sparta KW, it is minutes 0-15 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
3 Liga Group 4 games average 3.17 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Stal Kraśnik holds a clear advantage over Sparta KW in this encounter. Despite their poor recent form (5 consecutive losses), the hosts boast a solid home record with a 36% win rate and an average of 1.73 goals per match. Sparta KW exhibits disastrous away form – 0% away wins, 91% losses, scoring a mere 0.45 goals on average per match while conceding 3.36. The goal difference is drastic: the visitors stand at -32 in away fixtures. A key factor is efficiency – Sparta fails to score in 73% of their away matches, while Stal has only 27% such games at home. All indicators, including xG (1.31 vs 0.82) and average possession (52% vs 46%), point to the hosts' superiority, who should leverage home conditions to end their negative streak.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The data favors BTTS=NO, as Sparta KW has a very low seasonal goal average (0.45) and a high percentage of matches without a scored goal (FTS 73%), which significantly reduces the visitors' chances of scoring. In the last 5 matches, both teams averaged only 0.4 goals scored each, with BTTS in this period being just 20% for Sparta and 40% for Stal, confirming poor offensive efficiency. While the defenses are very weak (GA/avg: Stal 3.08, Sparta 3.36; CS: 8% and 0%), the main issue for BTTS remains primarily the visitors' ability to score a goal. Seasonal BTTS is clearly below the league average (Stal 42%, Sparta 27% vs league 56%), and Sparta more often plays high-scoring games without BTTS (over 2.5 & no BTTS 36%). Consequently, the most likely scenario is a match where mainly the hosts will score, and the visitors may remain without a goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile is clearly pro-goal primarily due to very weak defenses: Stal concedes an average of 3.08 goals per match, and Sparta as many as 3.36, with almost zero chance of a clean sheet (CS: 8% vs 0%). The 'conceded over 0.5' rates are extremely high (Stal 92%, Sparta 100%), which significantly boosts the baseline probability of at least 2 goals. The Over 2.5 line is supported by seasonal trends (Stal 75% over 2.5 matches, Sparta 55%) and the league average of 3.17 goals per match. Expected goals are distributed in favor of the hosts, as Sparta combines a low attack (0.45 scored) with a very high number of conceded goals (74 in the season). Despite weaker goal production in the last 5 matches on both sides (0.4 scored), the number of conceded goals remains very high (Stal 2.8, Sparta 4.2), which maintains a strong signal for Over 1.5 as the most reliable line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal for HT is a draw, as neither side leads at the break (leadingAtHT 0% vs 0%), and their average first-half goals are low (scoredAVGHT: 0.13 vs 0.17) coupled with a high clean sheet percentage at half-time (88% and 83%). For FT, the advantage lies with Stal, as Sparta has a 0% win rate, 0.09 PPG, and a 91% loss rate, alongside a very poor defensive record (3.36 goals conceded per match and 0% clean sheets). The second-half profile strengthens the scenario of the match swinging in favor of the hosts: Stal scores 1.0 goals per match after the break, while Sparta manages only 0.17, with Sparta frequently losing in the second half (83%). Simultaneously, both teams concede heavily (Stal 3.08, Sparta 3.36), which increases the risk of a chaotic turnaround after halftime and a deviation from the draw. Therefore, the most probable outcome is the X/1 variant: a cautious or goalless start followed by a Stal victory in the latter part of the match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Stal Kraśnik | Sparta KW | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 20% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.32 | 0.33 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.34 | 0.96 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Stal Kraśnik is 46% better for: goals scored per game.
1.27 goals / game - Stal Kraśnik · 0.87 goals / game - Sparta KW
Stal Kraśnik is 86% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.73 goals / game - Stal Kraśnik · 3.22 goals / game - Sparta KW
Stal Kraśnik scores in 59% of games (13 of 22 meczów), while Sparta KW keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 23 meczów).
Sparta KW scores in 39% of games (9 of 23 meczów), while Stal Kraśnik keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Stal Kraśnik
Over / Under - Sparta KW
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Stal Kraśnik is 123% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.27 pts / game - Stal Kraśnik · 0.57 pts / game - Sparta KW
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Stal Kraśnik - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Sparta KW - second-half results
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -6 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (39). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Stal Kraśnik
Sparta KW
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 4).
Teams vs league
| Stal Kraśnik | Liga | Sparta KW | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.00 | 3.17 | ▲ 4.09 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 55% | 57% | ▼ 35% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 55% | 60% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 5% | 24% | ▼ 4% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 59% | 53% | ▼ 48% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 68% | 55% | ▲ 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Stal Kraśnik's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Sparta KW. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Stal Kraśnik vs Sparta KW?
The 3 Liga Group 4 match finished Stal Kraśnik 0:2 Sparta KW. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Stal Kraśnik vs Sparta KW?
Stal Kraśnik score 1.27 goals per game on average and Sparta KW 0.87. The 3 Liga Group 4 average is 3.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Stal Kraśnik's matches and 35% of Sparta KW's.
What form are Stal Kraśnik and Sparta KW in?
Over the last 5 games Stal Kraśnik have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Sparta KW 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Stal Kraśnik vs Sparta KW?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


