Start vs Rosenborg: match statistics
Start vs Rosenborg: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Start play Rosenborg in Eliteserien (Norway). The match date is 18 July 2026 at 16:00. Venue: Sparebanken Sør Arena. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
Start: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Rosenborg: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Start scores 1.00 and concedes 2.36 goals per match. Rosenborg scores 1.15 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Start 71%, Rosenborg 31%. Over 2.5: Start 57%, Rosenborg 46%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Rosenborg has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.29. Start: 11.6 shots per match, Rosenborg: 11.7.
Match halves
Start: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.36. Rosenborg: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.46.
Goals by minute
Start: 31-45+ (5 goals). Rosenborg: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Eliteserien: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
Start has a clear home advantage: at home they average 1.2 goals per match with an average xG of 1.41 and 0% of home matches without scoring (percentage of home matches without a goal = 0%), indicating consistent creation and conversion of at least one chance. Rosenborg are dramatically ineffective away — averaging 0.0 goals scored on the road, percentage of away matches without a goal = 100% and 0% away wins, despite an away xG of 1.12. Defensively Start concedes 1.4 goals per home match on average (xG against 1.47), while Rosenborg concede 1.8 goals away (xG against 1.88), so the visitors are more exposed at the back on the road. Admittedly Rosenborg have better recent form overall (1.4 points per match in the last 5 with 2 wins, 9 goals in that period), while Start have 0.6 points per match and 1 win (8 goals), but Rosenborg’s poor away efficiency (0 goals, 80% away losses) is decisive. Considering Start’s 3.4 shots on target at home with ~9% conversion versus Rosenborg’s 2.8 shots on target away with practically 0% conversion, I forecast a home victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Start | Rosenborg | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Rosenborg is 133% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Start · 1.4 pts / match - Rosenborg
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rosenborg is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Start · 1.15 goals / match - Rosenborg
Rosenborg is 71% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.36 goals / match - Start · 1.38 goals / match - Rosenborg
Start scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Rosenborg keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).
Rosenborg scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Start keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Start
Over / Under — Rosenborg
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Start - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 7%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Rosenborg - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Start
Rosenborg
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).
Teams vs league
| Start | Liga | Rosenborg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.36 | 2.95 | ▼ 2.54 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 71% | 55% | ▼ 31% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 57% | 57% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 7% | 24% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 79% | 82% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 78% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Start vs Rosenborg?
The Eliteserien match finished Start 0:3 Rosenborg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Start vs Rosenborg?
Start score 1.00 goals per game on average and Rosenborg 1.15. The Eliteserien average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Start's matches and 31% of Rosenborg's.
What form are Start and Rosenborg in?
Over the last 5 games Start have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Rosenborg 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Start vs Rosenborg?
The statistical background for Start vs Rosenborg — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.