England - EFL League OneData current as of September 12, 2026

Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon: match statistics

155%(1.61)
X25%(4.00)
220%(5.00)

Stockport County demonstrates significantly better home form with a 56% win rate at home and a positive goal difference (+6) at their own stadium. The hosts hold an advantage in key offensive statistics, with an average of 1.56 goals per game and a higher xG (1.63 vs 1.13). AFC Wimbledon has poor away form with only a 32% win rate and a negative goal difference (-11), conceding an average of 1.89 goals per game away from home. Additionally, the visitors fail to keep a clean sheet in 89% of away matches, which, given Stockport's offensive potential, represents a significant weakness. Despite similar form in the last five matches for both teams (1.4 points per game each), the home advantage and better home statistics favor a home win, although AFC Wimbledon may put up tough resistance.

Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Stockport County played against AFC Wimbledon in EFL League One (England). The game was played on March 28, 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Recent form

Stockport County has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. AFC Wimbledon has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Stockport County scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 1.30. AFC Wimbledon scores 1.29 and allows 1.45. Games in this league average 2.61 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 62% of Stockport County's games and 53% of AFC Wimbledon's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 50%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Stockport County has the higher season xG average, 1.47 to 1.24 per game. Stockport County takes 12.6 shots per game, while AFC Wimbledon takes 11.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Stockport County leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. AFC Wimbledon leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.68 after halftime.

When the teams score

Stockport County's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For AFC Wimbledon, it is minutes 61-75 (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

League One games average 2.61 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Stockport County demonstrates significantly better home form with a 56% win rate at home and a positive goal difference (+6) at their own stadium. The hosts hold an advantage in key offensive statistics, with an average of 1.56 goals per game and a higher xG (1.63 vs 1.13). AFC Wimbledon has poor away form with only a 32% win rate and a negative goal difference (-11), conceding an average of 1.89 goals per game away from home. Additionally, the visitors fail to keep a clean sheet in 89% of away matches, which, given Stockport's offensive potential, represents a significant weakness. Despite similar form in the last five matches for both teams (1.4 points per game each), the home advantage and better home statistics favor a home win, although AFC Wimbledon may put up tough resistance.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal data suggests an elevated BTTS risk, particularly from the visitors' side: AFC Wimbledon has only 11% clean sheets and a high average of conceded goals at 1.89, which increases Stockport's chances to score. At the same time, Wimbledon scores regularly (1.32 goals/match), and Stockport concedes an average of 1.0 goals with an xGA of 1.20, so an away goal is realistic. BTTS metrics support the 'yes' pick: seasonally 47% for Stockport and 58% for Wimbledon, and in the last 5 matches 80% and 60% respectively, indicating a goal-scoring trend. Creation stats from the last 5 matches (xG: 1.84 vs 1.70) and average shots on target (3.63 vs 3.0) suggest both teams should generate goal-scoring opportunities. Additionally, the league's BTTS rate of 52% is not discouraging, and Wimbledon's weaker defense increases the probability that both teams will score in this match.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model indicates an elevated scoring potential primarily on the home side: Stockport has a solid xG for at home (1.34), while Wimbledon generates high xG against away (1.51) and concedes an average of 1.89 goals per match, with just 11% clean sheets. This signal is further supported by the fact that Wimbledon has Over 0.5 in 100% of matches, and Stockport in 89%, which strongly limits low-scoring scenarios. In the last 5 matches, both teams have boosted their creativity (xG for: 1.84 vs 1.70), and BTTS in this period is high (Stockport 80%, Wimbledon 60%), which increases the chances for at least 2 goals. At the same time, Stockport's seasonal distribution (Under 2.5 = 63%) and generally moderate Over 3.5 rates suggest that the match most often finishes below 4 goals. The strongest and most probable choice is Over 1.5, as it combines high frequency of occurrence with Wimbledon's clear defensive weaknesses.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal at half-time is a draw: Stockport draws at HT in 42% of matches, while Wimbledon does so in as many as 58%. Stockport is very solid in the first halves (averaging 0.26 goals conceded before HT and 74% clean sheets at the break), limiting the visitors' chances to take a lead. Over the longer horizon, the quality advantage lies with the hosts: better PPG (1.47 vs. 1.16), higher xG (1.34 vs. 1.13), and more shots taken (12.16 vs. 9.79). Wimbledon has a clearly weaker defense this season (1.89 goals conceded/match; xGA 1.51) and additionally concedes many goals after the break (1.11 goals conceded in the 2nd half), which favors a turnaround in favor of Stockport late in the game. Therefore, the most likely Half-Time/Full-Time scenario is a draw at half-time and a Stockport victory in the match.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

47Possession (%)53
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
10Shots11
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
4Shots on target4
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
1.13xG1.44
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
3Corners8
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
28Dangerous attacks63
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
8Fouls13
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
1Cards0
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
1.38Goals scored / game1.29
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
1.3Goals allowed / game1.45
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
55%Average possession47%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
4.38Shots on target / game3.32
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.62Shots per game10.97
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
4.38Shots on target3.32
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
10.9%Shot conversion11.8%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
55%Possession47%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
1.47xG for1.24
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
1.25xG against1.35
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

Shooting quality

Stockport County: BalancedAFC Wimbledon: Balanced
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
Accuracy (shots on target)35%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

AFC Wimbledon is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Stockport County · 1.4 pts / game - AFC Wimbledon

Stockport County
LLLWD
Season result split
46% W24% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
17-9-11
1.62 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-4-4
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
AFC Wimbledon
WWLLD
Season result split
37% W21% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-8-16
1.32 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-9
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Stockport County is 7% better for: goals scored per game.

1.38 goals / game - Stockport County · 1.29 goals / game - AFC Wimbledon

Stockport County is 12% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.3 goals / game - Stockport County · 1.45 goals / game - AFC Wimbledon

Stockport County scoring profile: very strong

Stockport County scores in 81% of games (30 of 37 meczów), while AFC Wimbledon keeps a clean sheet in 18% (7 of 38 meczów).

AFC Wimbledon scoring profile: strong

AFC Wimbledon scores in 66% of games (25 of 38 meczów), while Stockport County keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 37 meczów).

51Goals scored (season)49
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
48Goals conceded (season)55
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
2.68Average goals per game2.74
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
5Goals scored (last 5)8
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
10Goals conceded (last 5)7
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal66%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
41%2 goals45%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
11%3 goals16%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
5%4 goals3%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal82%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
35%2 goals32%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
16%3 goals21%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
3%4 goals8%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
Stockport County - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.23 of 37 meczów
52%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time24%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
8%BTTS in both halves8%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
24%Scored in both halves34%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
80%BTTS - last 560%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Stockport County - half-time state
30% leading43% draw27% trailing
AFC Wimbledon - half-time state
29% leading50% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per game (1st half)1.37
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.61
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
1.22Average goals (1st half)1.13
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
54%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
49%No goal before half-time50%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per game (2nd half)1.16
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.92
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
1.46Average goals (2nd half)1.61
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
46%Clean sheet after half-time37%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
46%No goal after half-time50%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

Stockport County - second-half results

38% W22% D41% L
49
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

AFC Wimbledon - second-half results

29% W29% D42% L
52
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding128%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Stockport County - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.20
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.81.2
Average goals per game1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
AFC Wimbledon - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.401.00
Goals scored / game1.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game1.41.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Stockport County
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
8
8
16-30
9
9
31-45
7
9
46-60
7
8
61-75
13
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

AFC Wimbledon
ScoredConceded
6
11
0-15
6
4
16-30
11
5
31-45
7
11
46-60
12
9
61-75
7
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Stockport County

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.82
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

AFC Wimbledon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

Stockport CountyLigaAFC Wimbledon
Average goals per game 2.682.61 2.74
Both teams scored 62%52% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%51% 50%
Clean sheets 24%27% 18%
Goal before half-time 76%71% 68%
Goal after half-time 86%80% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.61
Average goals per game
52%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / game
1.11
Away goals / game
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Stockport CountyGoalAdama SidibehAssist: Ben Osborn
  2. Stockport CountySubstitutionOn: Kyle WoottonOff: Adama Sidibeh
  3. Stockport CountyGoalKyle WoottonAssist: Isaac Olaofe
  4. Stockport CountySubstitutionOn: Odin BaileyOff: Josh Stokes
  5. AFC WimbledonSubstitutionOn: Nathan AsiimweOff: Joe Lewis
  6. AFC WimbledonSubstitutionOn: Antwoine HackfordOff: Jake Kenny Reeves
  7. Stockport CountyYellow cardLewis Bate
  8. AFC WimbledonSubstitutionOn: Kai JenningsOff: Zack Nelson
  9. AFC WimbledonSubstitutionOn: Osman FoyoOff: Omar Bugiel
  10. Stockport CountyGoalOliver Norwood

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Craig HicksMatches officiated: 13
2.85Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 238%Home wins15%Draws46%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon?

The EFL League One match finished Stockport County 3:0 AFC Wimbledon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon?

Stockport County score 1.38 goals per game on average and AFC Wimbledon 1.29. The EFL League One average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Stockport County's matches and 53% of AFC Wimbledon's.

What form are Stockport County and AFC Wimbledon in?

Over the last 5 games Stockport County have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and AFC Wimbledon 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon?

The statistical background for Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.