Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon: match statistics
Stockport County demonstrates significantly better home form with a 56% win rate at home and a positive goal difference (+6) at their own stadium. The hosts hold an advantage in key offensive statistics, with an average of 1.56 goals per game and a higher xG (1.63 vs 1.13). AFC Wimbledon has poor away form with only a 32% win rate and a negative goal difference (-11), conceding an average of 1.89 goals per game away from home. Additionally, the visitors fail to keep a clean sheet in 89% of away matches, which, given Stockport's offensive potential, represents a significant weakness. Despite similar form in the last five matches for both teams (1.4 points per game each), the home advantage and better home statistics favor a home win, although AFC Wimbledon may put up tough resistance.
Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Stockport County played against AFC Wimbledon in EFL League One (England). The game was played on March 28, 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Stockport County has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. AFC Wimbledon has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Stockport County scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 1.30. AFC Wimbledon scores 1.29 and allows 1.45. Games in this league average 2.61 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 62% of Stockport County's games and 53% of AFC Wimbledon's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 50%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Stockport County has the higher season xG average, 1.47 to 1.24 per game. Stockport County takes 12.6 shots per game, while AFC Wimbledon takes 11.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Stockport County leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. AFC Wimbledon leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.68 after halftime.
When the teams score
Stockport County's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For AFC Wimbledon, it is minutes 61-75 (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League One games average 2.61 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Stockport County demonstrates significantly better home form with a 56% win rate at home and a positive goal difference (+6) at their own stadium. The hosts hold an advantage in key offensive statistics, with an average of 1.56 goals per game and a higher xG (1.63 vs 1.13). AFC Wimbledon has poor away form with only a 32% win rate and a negative goal difference (-11), conceding an average of 1.89 goals per game away from home. Additionally, the visitors fail to keep a clean sheet in 89% of away matches, which, given Stockport's offensive potential, represents a significant weakness. Despite similar form in the last five matches for both teams (1.4 points per game each), the home advantage and better home statistics favor a home win, although AFC Wimbledon may put up tough resistance.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal data suggests an elevated BTTS risk, particularly from the visitors' side: AFC Wimbledon has only 11% clean sheets and a high average of conceded goals at 1.89, which increases Stockport's chances to score. At the same time, Wimbledon scores regularly (1.32 goals/match), and Stockport concedes an average of 1.0 goals with an xGA of 1.20, so an away goal is realistic. BTTS metrics support the 'yes' pick: seasonally 47% for Stockport and 58% for Wimbledon, and in the last 5 matches 80% and 60% respectively, indicating a goal-scoring trend. Creation stats from the last 5 matches (xG: 1.84 vs 1.70) and average shots on target (3.63 vs 3.0) suggest both teams should generate goal-scoring opportunities. Additionally, the league's BTTS rate of 52% is not discouraging, and Wimbledon's weaker defense increases the probability that both teams will score in this match.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model indicates an elevated scoring potential primarily on the home side: Stockport has a solid xG for at home (1.34), while Wimbledon generates high xG against away (1.51) and concedes an average of 1.89 goals per match, with just 11% clean sheets. This signal is further supported by the fact that Wimbledon has Over 0.5 in 100% of matches, and Stockport in 89%, which strongly limits low-scoring scenarios. In the last 5 matches, both teams have boosted their creativity (xG for: 1.84 vs 1.70), and BTTS in this period is high (Stockport 80%, Wimbledon 60%), which increases the chances for at least 2 goals. At the same time, Stockport's seasonal distribution (Under 2.5 = 63%) and generally moderate Over 3.5 rates suggest that the match most often finishes below 4 goals. The strongest and most probable choice is Over 1.5, as it combines high frequency of occurrence with Wimbledon's clear defensive weaknesses.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal at half-time is a draw: Stockport draws at HT in 42% of matches, while Wimbledon does so in as many as 58%. Stockport is very solid in the first halves (averaging 0.26 goals conceded before HT and 74% clean sheets at the break), limiting the visitors' chances to take a lead. Over the longer horizon, the quality advantage lies with the hosts: better PPG (1.47 vs. 1.16), higher xG (1.34 vs. 1.13), and more shots taken (12.16 vs. 9.79). Wimbledon has a clearly weaker defense this season (1.89 goals conceded/match; xGA 1.51) and additionally concedes many goals after the break (1.11 goals conceded in the 2nd half), which favors a turnaround in favor of Stockport late in the game. Therefore, the most likely Half-Time/Full-Time scenario is a draw at half-time and a Stockport victory in the match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Stockport County | AFC Wimbledon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
AFC Wimbledon is 75% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Stockport County · 1.4 pts / game - AFC Wimbledon
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Stockport County is 7% better for: goals scored per game.
1.38 goals / game - Stockport County · 1.29 goals / game - AFC Wimbledon
Stockport County is 12% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.3 goals / game - Stockport County · 1.45 goals / game - AFC Wimbledon
Stockport County scores in 81% of games (30 of 37 meczów), while AFC Wimbledon keeps a clean sheet in 18% (7 of 38 meczów).
AFC Wimbledon scores in 66% of games (25 of 38 meczów), while Stockport County keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 37 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Stockport County
Over / Under - AFC Wimbledon
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Stockport County - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
AFC Wimbledon - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Stockport County
AFC Wimbledon
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Stockport County | Liga | AFC Wimbledon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.68 | 2.61 | ▲ 2.74 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 62% | 52% | • 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 51% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 27% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 71% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 80% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon?
The EFL League One match finished Stockport County 3:0 AFC Wimbledon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon?
Stockport County score 1.38 goals per game on average and AFC Wimbledon 1.29. The EFL League One average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Stockport County's matches and 53% of AFC Wimbledon's.
What form are Stockport County and AFC Wimbledon in?
Over the last 5 games Stockport County have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and AFC Wimbledon 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon?
The statistical background for Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


