England - EFL League OneEdgeley ParkData current as of November 15, 2026

Stockport County vs Reading: match statistics

Stockport County crest
Stockport County
3 : 1half-time 2:1
Reading crest
Reading

Stockport County vs Reading: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Stockport County played against Reading in EFL League One (England). The game was played on November 14, 2026. Venue: Edgeley Park. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Stockport County has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Reading has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Stockport County scores 1.86 goals per game and allows 1.00. Reading scores 1.79 and allows 1.07. Games in this league average 2.79 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Stockport County's games and 50% of Reading's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 50%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Stockport County has the higher season xG average, 1.83 to 1.61 per game. Stockport County takes 17.1 shots per game, while Reading takes 15.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Stockport County leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 1.21 goals per game after halftime. Reading leads at halftime in 36% and scores 1.14 after halftime.

When the teams score

Stockport County's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). For Reading, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

League One games average 2.79 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Stockport County have won 71% of their home matches, while Reading have won only 14% of their away games. The hosts average 2.29 goals at home with an xG of 2.02, while the visitors score 1.14 goals away from home with an xG of 1.62 and have failed to score in 57% of those matches. Stockport should pose a greater attacking threat: they average 18.43 shots per game at home compared with Reading’s 15.71 away, while their shot conversion rates are 12% and 7%, respectively. Both teams have won 3 of their last 5 matches, but Reading conceded just 3 goals in that run compared with the hosts’ 5, so their defense could make life difficult for the favorites. Even so, Stockport’s clear advantage in home results and finishing makes a home win the pick.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Stockport average 2.43 goals at home and have never failed to score there, so a goal from them is likely. The greater uncertainty concerns Reading: they have failed to score in 57% of away matches, averaging 1.14 goals compared with the hosts’ 2.43. In their last five matches, Reading saw both teams score in only 20% of games, compared with 60% for Stockport, strengthening the case against BTTS - Yes. At the same time, Reading’s away xG is 1.62, while Stockport concede an average of 1.00 goal at home, so the visitors still have a realistic chance of scoring. However, the most likely scenario is Stockport scoring while Reading are kept off the scoresheet—BTTS - No, which means at least one team does not score, not necessarily a 0-0 draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Stockport score an average of 2.43 goals at home, and at least 2 goals are scored in 86% of their matches, strongly supporting the Over 1.5 goals pick. Reading concede an average of 1.14 goals away from home, giving the hosts a genuine chance of covering this line on their own. The teams’ attacking xG figures are similar—1.61 for Stockport and 1.62 for Reading—although the visitors have failed to score in 57% of their away matches, reducing confidence in higher totals. In their last 5 matches, both teams averaged 1.6 goals scored, but at least 3 goals were scored in only 40% of those games. Therefore, with a projected total of 2.70 goals, Over 1.5 offers a clearer signal than the uncertain 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: Reading were level at the break in 5 of their 7 away matches and were not trailing in any of them, while Stockport failed to score in the first half in each of their last 5 games. The home side’s advantage becomes clearer after the break: they average 1.43 goals in home matches in the second half, while Reading concede 1.14 on their travels. Stockport won the second half in 86% of their home matches, compared with just 14% of Reading’s away games. Stockport’s 71% home win rate, versus Reading’s 14% away win rate, also points to a home win at full-time. Although both teams have won 3 of their last 5 matches, the combination of Reading’s strong first halves and Stockport’s advantage after the break points most strongly to an X/1 scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

61Possession (%)39
Stockport CountyReading
17Shots8
Stockport CountyReading
6Shots on target5
Stockport CountyReading
1.91xG1.01
Stockport CountyReading
7Corners5
Stockport CountyReading
57Dangerous attacks21
Stockport CountyReading
8Fouls8
Stockport CountyReading
2Cards3
Stockport CountyReading

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Stockport CountyReading
1.86Goals scored / game1.79
Stockport CountyReading
1Goals allowed / game1.07
Stockport CountyReading
62%Average possession48%
Stockport CountyReading
4.93Shots on target / game4.86
Stockport CountyReading

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

17.14Shots per game15.29
Stockport CountyReading
4.93Shots on target4.86
Stockport CountyReading
10.8%Shot conversion11.7%
Stockport CountyReading
62%Possession48%
Stockport CountyReading
1.83xG for1.61
Stockport CountyReading
1.05xG against1.38
Stockport CountyReading

Shooting quality

Stockport County: DominantReading: Attacking
Stockport CountyReading
Accuracy (shots on target)29%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Stockport County is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Stockport County · 1.4 pts / game - Reading

Stockport County
WWDLW
Season result split
57% W14% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-4
1.86 pts / game · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.94Opponent xG: 0.85BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Reading
LWWDL
Season result split
43% W29% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-4
1.57 pts / game · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DWLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Stockport County is 7% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - Stockport County · 1.07 goals / game - Reading

Stockport County scoring profile: strong

Stockport County scores in 79% of games (11 of 14 games), while Reading keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 games).

Reading scoring profile: strong

Reading scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 games), while Stockport County keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 games).

26Goals scored (season)25
Stockport CountyReading
14Goals conceded (season)15
Stockport CountyReading
2.86Average goals per game2.86
Stockport CountyReading
6Goals scored (last 5)3
Stockport CountyReading
3Goals conceded (last 5)4
Stockport CountyReading

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal71%
Stockport CountyReading
50%2 goals50%
Stockport CountyReading
36%3 goals29%
Stockport CountyReading
14%4 goals14%
Stockport CountyReading

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal64%
Stockport CountyReading
21%2 goals29%
Stockport CountyReading
7%3 goals7%
Stockport CountyReading
7%4 goals7%
Stockport CountyReading

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time7%
Stockport CountyReading
7%BTTS in both halves0%
Stockport CountyReading
29%Scored in both halves21%
Stockport CountyReading

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Stockport CountyReading
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Stockport CountyReading
40%BTTS - last 520%
Stockport CountyReading

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Stockport CountyReading
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
Stockport CountyReading
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Stockport CountyReading

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
Stockport CountyReading
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time64%
Stockport CountyReading
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Stockport CountyReading

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Reading is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / game - Stockport County · 1.57 pts / game - Reading

Stockport County - half-time state
29% leading36% draw36% trailing
Reading - half-time state
36% leading50% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per game (1st half)1.57
Stockport CountyReading
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.64
Stockport CountyReading
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
Stockport CountyReading
1.21Average goals (1st half)0.86
Stockport CountyReading
57%Clean sheet before half-time79%
Stockport CountyReading
64%No goal before half-time64%
Stockport CountyReading

After half-time (2nd half)

2.07Points per game (2nd half)1.71
Stockport CountyReading
1.21Goals scored (2nd half)1.14
Stockport CountyReading
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
Stockport CountyReading
1.64Average goals (2nd half)2
Stockport CountyReading
71%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Stockport CountyReading
29%No goal after half-time43%
Stockport CountyReading

Stockport County - second-half results

57% W36% D7% L
17
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding197%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Reading - second-half results

50% W21% D29% L
22
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.7

Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Stockport County - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.002.20
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.40.2
Average goals per game0.61.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Reading - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.40
Goals scored / game0.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game0.21.2
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Stockport County
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
7
2
16-30
0
3
31-45
6
4
46-60
6
0
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Reading
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
0
0
16-30
7
0
31-45
7
3
46-60
4
4
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.86
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-48%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Stockport County

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.78
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Reading

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

Stockport CountyLigaReading
Average goals per game• 2.862.79• 2.86
Both teams scored▼ 50%57%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%53%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 36%26%▲ 36%
Goal before half-time▼ 64%69%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▼ 79%84%▲ 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / game
1.27
Away goals / game
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defensive advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Stockport CountyGoalKyle Wootton
  2. ReadingGoalJack MarriottAssist: Kyrell Lisbie
  3. ReadingYellow cardHayden Roberts
  4. Stockport CountyGoalEthan EnnisAssist: Harry Wood
  5. ReadingYellow cardKyrell Lisbie
  6. Stockport CountyGoalJack DiamondAssist: Kyle Wootton
  7. Stockport CountyYellow cardHarry Wood
  8. ReadingSubstitutionOn: Randell WilliamsOff: Conor Masterson
  9. ReadingSubstitutionOn: Josh StokesOff: Daniel Kankam Kyerewaa
  10. Stockport CountyYellow cardKyron Gordon
  11. Stockport CountySubstitutionOn: Mamadou JobeOff: Kyron Gordon
  12. ReadingYellow cardLiam Fraser

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Stockport County's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Reading. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Reading FC
1 : 0
Stockport County FC
Stockport County FC
1 : 1
Reading FC

FAQ

What was the result of Stockport County vs Reading?

The EFL League One match finished Stockport County 3:1 Reading. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Stockport County and Reading?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Stockport County won 0, Reading won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Stockport County vs Reading?

Stockport County score 1.86 goals per game on average and Reading 1.79. The EFL League One average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Stockport County's matches and 50% of Reading's.

What form are Stockport County and Reading in?

Over the last 5 games Stockport County have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Reading 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Stockport County vs Reading?

The statistical background for Stockport County vs Reading — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.