Strømmen vs Moss: match statistics
Strømmen vs Moss: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Strømmen played against Moss in First Division (Norway). The game was played on June 27, 2026. Venue: Strømmen Stadion. Final score: 3:2.
Recent form
Strømmen has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Moss has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Strømmen scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 2.75. Moss scores 1.75 and allows 2.17. Games in this league average 3.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Strømmen's games and 83% of Moss's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 83%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 72% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Moss has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.26 per game. Strømmen takes 10.8 shots per game, while Moss takes 15.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Strømmen leads at halftime in 8% of its games and scores 0.92 goals per game after halftime. Moss leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.08 after halftime.
When the teams score
Strømmen's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Moss, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 3.63 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 72% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win ('2'). Moss holds a clear offensive advantage: averaging 2.0 goals scored away versus Strømmen's 1.0 at home, higher xG 1.91 vs 1.36 and more attempts—16.17 shots and 6.67 on target per game compared to the hosts' 12 shots and 3.67 on target. Strømmen concedes 2.83 goals per home match on average, has a negative goal difference of -11 and loses 67% of home matches, while Moss has a smaller negative away goal difference (-3) and better shot conversion (12% vs 8%). In the last 5 matches Strømmen recorded 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses with 0.8 points per game, whereas Moss has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses with 1.0 point per game, which further favors the visitors. Both teams allow many goals (Strømmen average total 3.83 and Moss away matches 4.5), so I expect an open, high-scoring game and a Moss victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 83% (Strømmen 83% vs Moss 83%), which is a strong signal for the "both teams to score" variant. Moss has recorded BTTS in 100% of their last 5 matches and scored 9 goals in those five games, while Strømmen has only 40% BTTS in the last 5 and 5 goals scored, which lowers confidence but does not negate the trend. Season averages show Strømmen scores 1.5 and concedes 1.83 per match, and Moss scores 2.0 and concedes 2.5, meaning both teams regularly score and concede. xG confirms this picture: Strømmen xG 1.64 vs xG against 1.73, Moss xG 1.91 vs xG against 1.85, suggesting real scoring chances for both sides. Additionally, low clean sheet percentages (Strømmen 17% vs Moss 0%) and high rates of matches over 2.5 goals (67% and 100%) favor BTTS, hence 80% on "Yes" and 20% on "No".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model based on average xG and opponent defense yields 1.75 xG for Strømmen and 1.82 xG for Moss (total 3.57 expected goals); a Poisson distribution at this lambda translates to ~87% chance for Over 1.5, ~69% for Over 2.5 and ~48% for Over 3.5. Seasonal metrics confirm a high goal potential: Strømmen have 67% of matches Over 2.5, Moss 100% Over 2.5, and the league average is 3.63 goals per game. Both teams see BTTS in 83% of matches; Moss averages 6.67 shots on target and xG 1.91 versus Strømmen 4.5 SoT and xG 1.64, with conversion rates of 12% vs 10%, which favors goal exchanges. In the last 5 matches Strømmen score 1.0 and concede 1.6 on average, Moss score 1.8 and concede 2.4; Moss had 80% of those 5 matches Over 2.5 and 100% BTTS. The strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (recommendation: Over at the 1.5 line) — this has the highest probability (87%) at 3.57 xG; Over 2.5 (69%) also makes sense, while Over 3.5 is roughly a coin toss (48%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Data indicate an advantage for Moss: xG 1.91 versus 1.64 for the hosts, more shots on target 6.67 vs 4.5 and higher conversion 12% vs 10%, translating into greater chances for the visitors to win. In the last five matches Moss led at the break in 60% (3 of 5), and the average goals at half-time in those games are 1.2 for the visitors vs 0.2 for the hosts, so a scenario with the visitors leading after 45 minutes is dominant. The visitors are also stronger after the break: on average 1.33 goals in the second half, 100% of matches with at least 0.5 second-half goals and an average 1.5 points gained in the second half, which justifies the highest weighting for the 2/2 scenario. The hosts, however, often score late goals (5 goals in 76–90 min) and have led at the break in 50% of matches this season, so alternatives like X/2 (22%) or even 2/1 (7%) are considered as possible turnarounds. Both teams have a high percentage of matches with goals for both sides (BTTS 83% each), so the projection also allows for an HT/FT draw (X/X 12%), but with a preference for a final victory for the visitors.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Strømmen | Moss | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Moss is 25% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Strømmen · 1 pts / game - Moss
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Moss is 40% better for: goals scored per game.
1.25 goals / game - Strømmen · 1.75 goals / game - Moss
Moss is 27% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.75 goals / game - Strømmen · 2.17 goals / game - Moss
Strømmen scores in 58% of games (7 of 12 meczów), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 meczów).
Moss scores in 92% of games (11 of 12 meczów), while Strømmen keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Strømmen
Over / Under - Moss
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Moss is 116% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.58 pts / game - Strømmen · 1.25 pts / game - Moss
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Strømmen - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 17%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Moss - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Strømmen
Moss
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Strømmen | Liga | Moss | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.00 | 3.63 | ▲ 3.92 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 58% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 72% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 22% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 75% | 77% | ▼ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 88% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Strømmen vs Moss?
The First Division match finished Strømmen 3:2 Moss. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Strømmen vs Moss?
Strømmen score 1.25 goals per game on average and Moss 1.75. The First Division average is 3.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Strømmen's matches and 83% of Moss's.
What form are Strømmen and Moss in?
Over the last 5 games Strømmen have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Moss 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Strømmen vs Moss?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Strømmen vs Moss: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


