Stuttgart II vs Ulm: match statistics
Stuttgart II vs Ulm: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Stuttgart II played against Ulm in 3. Liga (Germany). The game was played on April 8, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Stuttgart II has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Ulm has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Stuttgart II scores 1.26 goals per game and allows 1.61. Ulm scores 1.29 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 3.12 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of Stuttgart II's games and 71% of Ulm's. The Over 2.5 rates are 68% and 68%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Stuttgart II has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.43 per game. Stuttgart II takes 13.4 shots per game, while Ulm takes 11.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Stuttgart II leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.65 goals per game after halftime. Ulm leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.77 after halftime.
When the teams score
Stuttgart II's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (10 goals). For Ulm, it is minutes 46-60 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
3. Liga games average 3.12 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Stuttgart II are the favorites: at home they have a 53% win rate and score on average 1.47 goals with 5.27 shots on target per match, while Ulm on the road average 1.33 goals and only 3.4 shots on target. Defensively the hosts perform better — Stuttgart concedes 1.33 goals at home versus 2.07 conceded by Ulm away, and xG shows 1.62 for Stuttgart against 1.41 for Ulm. Although in the last five matches Ulm has a slightly higher points average (1.4 vs 1.2 points per match), the visitors have a high away loss rate (60%) and a negative away goal differential of -11, which weakens their chances. Additionally Stuttgart has higher possession (55% vs 49%), more total shots (13.53 vs 12.27) and a higher home clean sheet rate (20% vs 13%), so they should create more high-quality chances. On this basis I forecast a home win; probability distribution is 62% for Stuttgart, 18% for a draw and 20% for Ulm, with several goals expected (average total goals 2.8 for Stuttgart and 3.4 in Ulm’s matches).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A strong signal for BTTS is that season rates are 63% for Stuttgart II and 80% for Ulm, and in the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 80% (4/5). Both sides score and concede frequently: season goals for are 1.25 (Stuttgart II) and 1.33 (Ulm), while goals conceded are 1.94 and 2.07 respectively; xG for is 1.44 and 1.41, and xG against around 1.6 and 1.65, indicating roughly 1.4–1.65 xG generated from both sides. Additionally, matches often exceed 2.5 goals — 63% for the home team and 73% for the away — and the Over2.5 + BTTS combination occurs in 56% and 60% of cases, suggesting an open game. Clean sheets are rare (19% and 13%), and in the last 5 matches Stuttgart averaged 1.4 scored and 1.6 conceded, while Ulm averaged 1.2 scored and 1.4 conceded, so both teams regularly both score and concede. Based on this I assign an 85% probability to BTTS - Yes and 15% to No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: Stuttgart II has an attacking xG of 1.44, Ulm 1.41, with xG conceded 1.60 (Stuttgart II) and 1.65 (Ulm). From these values I expect about 1.55 goals for the home side and 1.50 for the visitors, i.e. approximately 3.05 total goals. A Poisson distribution with λ=3.05 yields an over 1.5 probability of around 81% (1 − P(0) − P(1) ≈ 0.81), over 2.5 about 59% and over 3.5 about 36%. Season metrics confirm this trend: Stuttgart has 69% of matches over 1.5, Ulm 93%; over 2.5 stands at 63% and 73%, and both-teams-to-score rates are 63% and 80% respectively. Given the high expected 3.05 goals, large average goals conceded 1.94 (Stuttgart II) and 2.07 (Ulm), and the superior probability, the best betting signal is Over 1.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw appears most likely, as both teams have a high proportion of goals in the first half (seasonOver05PercentageHT: 81% for the home side and 80% for the visitors) alongside drawingAtHTPercentage values of 31% (Stuttgart II) and 40% (Ulm). Stuttgart II has a slight edge in chance creation: xG_for_avg 1.44 versus 1.41 for Ulm and 4.31 shots on target per game versus 3.4, and they collect more points at home over the season (seasonPPG_home 1.0 vs seasonPPG_away 0.8) and win more often (31% vs 20%). The key argument for a home turnaround after the break is the last five matches: Stuttgart II scored an average of 1.4 goals in second halves versus 0.33 for Ulm (last5_scored_2hg_avg), and the home side won second halves in 60% of cases versus 0% for the visitors. Therefore the primary scenario is a Half-Time draw and a home win (X/1, 32%), while 1/1 (17%) and X/X (20%) are secondary, and variants with an Ulm victory are less likely given their lower seasonPPG_away 0.8 and winPercentage_away 20%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Stuttgart II | Ulm | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Stuttgart II is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Stuttgart II · 0.8 pts / game - Ulm
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Stuttgart II is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.61 goals / game - Stuttgart II · 2 goals / game - Ulm
Stuttgart II scores in 74% of games (23 of 31 meczów), while Ulm keeps a clean sheet in 16% (5 of 31 meczów).
Ulm scores in 87% of games (27 of 31 meczów), while Stuttgart II keeps a clean sheet in 16% (5 of 31 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Stuttgart II
Over / Under - Ulm
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Stuttgart II is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.32 pts / game - Stuttgart II · 0.94 pts / game - Ulm
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Stuttgart II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Ulm - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Stuttgart II
Ulm
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Stuttgart II | Liga | Ulm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.87 | 3.12 | ▲ 3.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 63% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 63% | ▲ 68% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 22% | ▼ 16% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 77% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 82% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Stuttgart II's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Ulm. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Stuttgart II vs Ulm?
The 3. Liga match finished Stuttgart II 1:1 Ulm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Stuttgart II vs Ulm?
Stuttgart II score 1.26 goals per game on average and Ulm 1.29. The 3. Liga average is 3.12 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Stuttgart II's matches and 71% of Ulm's.
What form are Stuttgart II and Ulm in?
Over the last 5 games Stuttgart II have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Ulm 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Stuttgart II vs Ulm?
The statistical background for Stuttgart II vs Ulm — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


