Sūduva vs Džiugas Telšiai: match statistics
Sūduva vs Džiugas Telšiai: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sūduva played against Džiugas Telšiai in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on April 19, 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Recent form
Sūduva has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Džiugas Telšiai has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Sūduva scores 1.13 goals per game and allows 0.50. Džiugas Telšiai scores 1.25 and allows 0.63. Games in this league average 2.27 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 25% of Sūduva's games and 38% of Džiugas Telšiai's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 25%, compared with league averages of 41% for BTTS and 43% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sūduva has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 1.33 per game. Sūduva takes 12.5 shots per game, while Džiugas Telšiai takes 11.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Sūduva leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. Džiugas Telšiai leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sūduva's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). For Džiugas Telšiai, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
A Lyga games average 2.27 goals. Both teams score in 41% of games, and 43% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Džiugas Telšiai appears favored based on form and results: they have 5 wins this season versus Sūduva's 2 and have won 4 of their last 5 matches, averaging 2.6 points per game, while Sūduva has 1 win in their last 5 and averages 1.0 point per game. The visitors’ away defense is notable — Sūduva have not conceded at their home stadium yet (average 0 conceded and 100% clean sheets), but they also failed to score in 50% of home matches, which limits their attacking output. Offensive metrics are similar: Sūduva averages 12.25 shots and 3.75 on target per home game with xG 1.53 and an average of 1.75 goals, while Džiugas records 11.17 shots, 3.17 on target, xG 1.31 and an average 1.33 goals away. Lower FTS for the visitors (17% vs 50%), together with a better winning run and a lower average of away goals conceded (0.5), support a narrow Džiugas victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess BTTS - Yes as less likely: Džiugas concedes only 0.5 goals per match on average and has a 67% clean sheet rate, with 0 goals conceded in the last 5 matches, which is a strong defensive signal. Sūduva scores 1.0 and concedes 1.0 at home on the season, and in the last 5 matches averages 1.4 scored and 0.8 conceded, indicating a moderate home attack. Both teams have similar attacking xG (1.37 for Sūduva vs 1.31 for Džiugas), but season BTTS is 50% for Sūduva versus only 33% for Džiugas, while the league records just 38% BTTS and as many as 81% of matches with a clean sheet. Considering Džiugas’s 0% BTTS in the last 5 fixtures, his 67% clean sheets and the overall high clean sheet rate in the league, it is more likely that at least one team will fail to score; therefore the recommendation is a 'No' on BTTS.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: Sūduva’s attacking xG is 1.37, Džiugas’s attacking xG is 1.31, and opponents’ xG conceded are 1.11 (for Sūduva’s rivals) and 1.22 (for Džiugas’s rivals), yielding an expected 1.24 goals for Sūduva and 1.27 for Džiugas (total 2.51). Season averages show Sūduva scores 1.00 at home, Džiugas 1.33 away, and Over 0.5 occurred in 100% of Sūduva’s matches and 83% of Džiugas’s matches, so at least one goal in the match is very likely. On the other hand Džiugas has 67% clean sheets and has not conceded in the last 5 matches (ga_l5_away = 0.0), and season Over 2.5 rates are 50% for Sūduva vs 17% for Džiugas, which limits the chance of a high-scoring game. Considering the combined expected 2.51 goals, the difference in finishing efficiency (Sūduva 7% vs Džiugas 12%) and form (last 5: Sūduva 'lddwl', Džiugas 'wwdww'), the strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5; Over 2.5 has only a slight edge, and Over 3.5 remains unlikely.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time a draw is most likely: the home team were level at the break in 100% of matches, the visitors in 83%, with average first-half goals 0.5 (Sūduva) versus 0.17 (Džiugas). After the break the visitors are the favorites — visitors win percentage 67% versus 50% for the hosts, season average goals scored 1.33 (visitors) vs 1.00 (hosts) and average goals conceded 0.5 (visitors) vs 1.0 (hosts). Average xG is similar (1.37 hosts vs 1.31 visitors), but Džiugas has a better shot conversion 12% versus Sūduva’s 7%, indicating greater efficiency with chances. Additionally the visitors scored 4 goals in minutes 76–90 and 3 goals in minutes 61–75, and their second-half wins reach 83% versus 50% for the hosts, so the most probable outcome is a draw at half-time and a visitors’ win at full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sūduva | Džiugas Telšiai | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Džiugas Telšiai is 160% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Sūduva · 2.6 pts / game - Džiugas Telšiai
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Džiugas Telšiai is 11% better for: goals scored per game.
1.13 goals / game - Sūduva · 1.25 goals / game - Džiugas Telšiai
Sūduva is 26% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.5 goals / game - Sūduva · 0.63 goals / game - Džiugas Telšiai
Sūduva scores in 50% of games (4 of 8 meczów), while Džiugas Telšiai keeps a clean sheet in 63% (5 of 8 meczów).
Džiugas Telšiai scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 meczów), while Sūduva keeps a clean sheet in 63% (5 of 8 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sūduva
Over / Under - Džiugas Telšiai
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sūduva is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - Sūduva · 0.88 pts / game - Džiugas Telšiai
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sūduva - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Džiugas Telšiai - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sūduva
Džiugas Telšiai
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Sūduva | Liga | Džiugas Telšiai | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.63 | 2.27 | ▼ 1.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 41% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 25% | 43% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 63% | 39% | ▲ 63% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 64% | ▼ 38% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 68% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Sūduva's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 1 loss against Džiugas Telšiai. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Sūduva vs Džiugas Telšiai?
The A Lyga match finished Sūduva 3:2 Džiugas Telšiai. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sūduva and Džiugas Telšiai?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Sūduva won 1, Džiugas Telšiai won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sūduva vs Džiugas Telšiai?
Sūduva score 1.13 goals per game on average and Džiugas Telšiai 1.25. The A Lyga average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Sūduva's matches and 38% of Džiugas Telšiai's.
What form are Sūduva and Džiugas Telšiai in?
Over the last 5 games Sūduva have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Džiugas Telšiai 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sūduva vs Džiugas Telšiai?
The statistical background for Sūduva vs Džiugas Telšiai — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


