Sumqayıt vs Qabala: match statistics
Sumqayıt vs Qabala: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sumqayıt played against Qabala in Premyer Liqası (Azerbaijan). The game was played on April 19, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Sumqayıt has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Qabala has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Sumqayıt scores 1.19 goals per game and allows 1.52. Qabala scores 0.93 and allows 1.59. Games in this league average 2.57 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 52% of Sumqayıt's games and 41% of Qabala's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 44%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sumqayıt has the higher season xG average, 1.26 to 1.21 per game. Sumqayıt takes 9.4 shots per game, while Qabala takes 10.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Sumqayıt leads at halftime in 7% of its games and scores 0.81 goals per game after halftime. Qabala leads at halftime in 15% and scores 0.48 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sumqayıt's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). For Qabala, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Premyer Liqası games average 2.57 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sumqayıt has an offensive edge at home — they average 1.38 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.32 and a higher conversion rate of 14% versus Qabala’s 0.93 goals, xG 1.18 and 10% conversion on the road. The hosts control more possession (53% vs 43%) and less frequently finish matches goalless (31% of Sumqayıt’s matches without a goal vs 50% for Qabala), which increases their likelihood of scoring. Defensively both teams are vulnerable — Sumqayıt concedes 1.77 goals at home and Qabala concedes 1.57 away, but in the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded 14 goals compared to 10 conceded by Sumqayıt, indicating bigger short-term defensive issues for Qabala. The season-long record supports the home advantage: Sumqayıt has 8 wins this season and a 31% home win rate, while Qabala has 5 wins and only a 14% away win rate; therefore I tip the home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes. In the last 5 matches Sumqayıt has BTTS in 80% of games and Qabala in 60%, giving an average 70% form signal. Both sides defend poorly — Sumqayıt concedes 2.0 goals per game over the last 5, Qabala 2.8; seasonally they concede 1.62 and 1.57 respectively, so susceptibility to conceding is consistent. Offensively xG is 1.24 for Sumqayıt and 1.18 for Qabala, with an average of 3.23 and 3.50 shots on target, so there is real potential for goals from both teams despite seasonal goals per game around ~0.92 and ~0.93. Low clean sheet likelihood is confirmed by seasonal percentages: 8% clean sheets for Sumqayıt and 21% for Qabala, while the league BTTS rate is 45%, so overall this points to a strong BTTS signal. Considering 10 and 14 goals conceded in the last 5 matches and the higher BTTS rate in form, I assign 70% to Yes and 30% to No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Sumqayıt averages 0.92 goals per game, Qabala 0.93, but xG is 1.24 for the home side and 1.18 for the visitors, suggesting more chances than raw stats indicate. Season share of matches over 1.5 goals is 77% for Sumqayıt and 57% for Qabala, with clean sheets rare (8% for Sumqayıt, 21% for Qabala), which increases the likelihood of at least two goals. In the last 5 games Sumqayıt conceded 10 goals (2.0 per game), Qabala conceded 14 goals (2.8 per game), and both teams had over 2.5 in 60% of recent matches, raising the probability of a higher-scoring outcome. Averaged expected xG for this match is about 1.33 for the home team and 1.27 for the away team (total 2.60), although low shot conversion rates (8% and 10%) could suppress goals below xG. Therefore I recommend an "over" on the 1.5 line as the strongest and most conservative pick (approx. 70%), while Over 2.5 is riskier (approx. 53%) and Over 3.5 has a low probability (approx. 22%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X), because the home side ended the first half level in 54% of matches while the visitors did so in 43%, strongly favoring an X at the break. Both teams score under 1 goal per game (0.92 for the hosts and 0.93 for the visitors), and the league average is only 2.6 goals per match, so I expect a low-scoring game and a split of points. xG indicates balanced attacking output (1.24 xG for the hosts versus 1.18 xG for the visitors), with the visitors conceding more xG against them (1.59 vs 1.34), which creates chances but not dominance by either side. The hosts’ last-5 form ('dllll') and the absence of leads at the break in their last five matches (0%) reduce the likelihood that Sumqayıt will be leading at HT and hold on for a win; although the visitors have scored 9 first-half goals in their last five (versus 3 for the hosts), these are likely deviations from the visitors’ season-long HT average (0.29).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sumqayıt | Qabala | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Qabala is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - Sumqayıt · 0.6 pts / game - Qabala
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sumqayıt is 28% better for: goals scored per game.
1.19 goals / game - Sumqayıt · 0.93 goals / game - Qabala
Sumqayıt is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.52 goals / game - Sumqayıt · 1.59 goals / game - Qabala
Sumqayıt scores in 70% of games (19 of 27 meczów), while Qabala keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 27 meczów).
Qabala scores in 52% of games (14 of 27 meczów), while Sumqayıt keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sumqayıt
Over / Under - Qabala
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Qabala is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.7 pts / game - Sumqayıt · 0.93 pts / game - Qabala
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sumqayıt - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Qabala - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 19%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sumqayıt
Qabala
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premyer Liqası).
Teams vs league
| Sumqayıt | Liga | Qabala | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.70 | 2.57 | • 2.52 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 52% | 45% | ▼ 41% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 52% | 47% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 33% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 66% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 74% | 72% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Sumqayıt's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Qabala. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Sumqayıt vs Qabala?
The Premyer Liqası match finished Sumqayıt 1:0 Qabala. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sumqayıt and Qabala?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Sumqayıt won 1, Qabala won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sumqayıt vs Qabala?
Sumqayıt score 1.19 goals per game on average and Qabala 0.93. The Premyer Liqası average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Sumqayıt's matches and 41% of Qabala's.
What form are Sumqayıt and Qabala in?
Over the last 5 games Sumqayıt have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Qabala 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sumqayıt vs Qabala?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


