Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest: match statistics
Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sunderland played against Nottingham Forest in Premier League (England). The game was played on April 24, 2026. Final score: 0:5.
Recent form
Sunderland has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Nottingham Forest has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Sunderland scores 1.09 goals per game and allows 1.21. Nottingham Forest scores 1.09 and allows 1.36. Games in this league average 2.74 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 45% of Sunderland's games and 42% of Nottingham Forest's. The Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 52%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nottingham Forest has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.18 per game. Sunderland takes 10.0 shots per game, while Nottingham Forest takes 12.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Sunderland leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.76 goals per game after halftime. Nottingham Forest leads at halftime in 15% and scores 0.73 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sunderland's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Nottingham Forest, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Premier League games average 2.74 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sunderland holds a clear defensive edge at home — conceding on average 0.88 goals per home match versus Nottingham’s 1.5 conceded on the road. In attack the hosts average 1.44 goals at home, while the visitors record 1.13 goals away, and the share of goalless matches is 19% versus 31% in favor of Sunderland. xG are nearly identical (1.28 xG for Sunderland at home vs 1.25 xG for Nottingham away), but Nottingham have scored 10 goals in their last 5 matches compared to Sunderland’s 6, which gives the visitors an offensive momentum. Nottingham have a better recent points form over the last 5 fixtures (2.2 pts/match vs Sunderland’s 1.2 pts/match), yet their away record is weaker (away wins 31% vs Sunderland’s 50% at home and goal difference -6 away vs +9 for the hosts). Therefore I forecast a home win with approximate probabilities: 55% home, 25% draw, 20% Nottingham win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project BTTS - Yes in Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest with a 60% probability (No 40%). Nottingham have scored 10 and conceded 3 in their last 5 (2.0 for, 0.6 against) with BTTS 60% in that span, while Sunderland have 6 for and 7 against in their last 5 (1.2 and 1.4) with BTTS 40%. Season-long BTTS rates are moderate — Sunderland 41%, Nottingham 44% — but the league average BTTS is 55%; combined with low clean sheet expected rates (Sunderland 24%, Nottingham 25%) this increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. The xG and shots profile supports this: Sunderland have xG For 1.65 and average 14.88 shots (3.82 on target), creating chances above their 1.06 goals scored average, and Nottingham have xG For 1.25 with an 11% conversion rate and xG Against 1.57 — both sides have a realistic chance to score. Considering Nottingham’s strong recent attacking form (10 goals), Sunderland’s susceptibility to conceding, and their chance creation (xG 1.65), the Goal/Goal scenario appears more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-and-form based model projects total goals around 2.89. Sunderland has xG_for 1.65, while Nottingham concedes on average xG 1.57, averaging ~1.61 for the home side; Nottingham has xG_for 1.25 versus Sunderland’s xG_conceded 1.31, yielding ~1.28 for the away side. This combined xG (2.89) is significantly higher than the teams’ seasonal goals sum 1.06+1.13=2.19 and slightly above the league average 2.74, which favors Over. In the last 5 matches Nottingham scored 10 goals (2.0 avg) and conceded 3 (0.6 avg), while Sunderland scored 6 (1.2) and conceded 7 (1.4); shot conversion is 7.0% for Sunderland and 11.0% for Nottingham, so the visitors are more efficient. Considering season Over 1.5 rates — 71% for Sunderland and 88% for Nottingham — I estimate a 78% chance of Over 1.5 (55% for Over 2.5); therefore I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Sunderland draws at half-time in 59% of matches, scores an average of 0.41 goals in the first half and keeps a clean sheet at the break in 53% of games, which strongly indicates an even, low-scoring opening period. Nottingham concedes an average of 0.94 goals by half-time, but in their last five matches they led at the break in 40% of games and have recently recorded a 60% win rate, so they are capable of imposing tempo when in form. Sunderland produces higher xG (1.65 vs. the visitors’ 1.25) and more shots (14.88 vs. 10.25), but Nottingham are more efficient in finishing (conversion rate 11% vs. the home side’s 7%). In the second half the visitors’ advantage is evident: Nottingham score an average of 0.81 goals after the break and win the second half in 44% of matches, whereas Sunderland win it in 24% and collect fewer points after half-time (1.06 vs. 1.63). Summing these figures, the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a Nottingham turnaround for the full-time result (X/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sunderland | Nottingham Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sunderland is 12% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.21 goals / game - Sunderland · 1.36 goals / game - Nottingham Forest
Sunderland scores in 67% of games (22 of 33 meczów), while Nottingham Forest keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 33 meczów).
Nottingham Forest scores in 58% of games (19 of 33 meczów), while Sunderland keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sunderland
Over / Under - Nottingham Forest
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sunderland is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / game - Sunderland · 0.85 pts / game - Nottingham Forest
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sunderland - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Nottingham Forest - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sunderland
Nottingham Forest
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Sunderland | Liga | Nottingham Forest | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.30 | 2.74 | ▼ 2.45 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 55% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 54% | ▼ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 26% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 71% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 79% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Sunderland's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Nottingham Forest. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest?
The Premier League match finished Sunderland 0:5 Nottingham Forest. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest?
Sunderland score 1.09 goals per game on average and Nottingham Forest 1.09. The Premier League average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Sunderland's matches and 42% of Nottingham Forest's.
What form are Sunderland and Nottingham Forest in?
Over the last 5 games Sunderland have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Nottingham Forest 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sunderland vs Nottingham Forest?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


