Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Super Nova II vs JDFS Alberts: match statistics

Super Nova II crest
Super Nova II
2 : 1half-time 1:0
JDFS Alberts crest
JDFS Alberts
120%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
255%(0.00)

Statistical analysis indicates a clear advantage for the visiting team JDFS Alberts. Super Nova II has no statistical data available regarding home matches this season, suggesting either a lack of played games or very poor form. JDFS Alberts in their last five matches scored 8 goals while conceding only 4, averaging 2 points per game and recording an impressive streak: three wins, one draw, and one loss. The visitors' form, expressed as 'wwwdl', confirms their good condition and offensive efficiency. Considering the complete lack of data on the home side and the solid form of JDFS Alberts, an away win appears to be the most likely scenario for this match.

Super Nova II vs JDFS Alberts: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Super Nova II play JDFS Alberts in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 20 March 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Super Nova II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. JDFS Alberts: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Super Nova II scores 1.54 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. JDFS Alberts scores 2.15 and concedes 1.62. League average: 3.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Super Nova II 69%, JDFS Alberts 77%. Over 2.5: Super Nova II 46%, JDFS Alberts 77%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

JDFS Alberts has higher xG: 1.90 vs 1.19. Super Nova II: 7.9 shots per match, JDFS Alberts: 14.4.

Match halves

Super Nova II: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.85. JDFS Alberts: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.38.

Goals by minute

Super Nova II: 16-30 (4 goals). JDFS Alberts: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates a clear advantage for the visiting team JDFS Alberts. Super Nova II has no statistical data available regarding home matches this season, suggesting either a lack of played games or very poor form. JDFS Alberts in their last five matches scored 8 goals while conceding only 4, averaging 2 points per game and recording an impressive streak: three wins, one draw, and one loss. The visitors' form, expressed as 'wwwdl', confirms their good condition and offensive efficiency. Considering the complete lack of data on the home side and the solid form of JDFS Alberts, an away win appears to be the most likely scenario for this match.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
5Shots10
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
2Shots on target6
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
0.84xG1.62
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
2Corners10
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
51Dangerous attacks79
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
-1Fouls-1
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
-1Cards-1
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
1.54Goals scored / match2.15
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
1.46Goals conceded / match1.62
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
43%Average possession54%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
3.62Shots on target / match6.46
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.92Shots per match14.38
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
3.62Shots on target6.46
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
19.4%Shot conversion15%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
43%Possession54%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
1.19xG for1.9
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
1.74xG against1.22
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts

Shooting quality

Super Nova II: Counter-attackingJDFS Alberts: Attacking
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
Accuracy (shots on target)46%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

JDFS Alberts is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Super Nova II · 2 pts / match - JDFS Alberts

Super Nova II
DLWDL
Season result split
38% W31% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-4
1.46 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 0.93Opponent xG: 2.16BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
JDFS Alberts
WDWLW
Season result split
54% W15% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-4
1.77 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.21Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JDFS Alberts is 40% better for: goals scored per match.

1.54 goals / match - Super Nova II · 2.15 goals / match - JDFS Alberts

Super Nova II is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.46 goals / match - Super Nova II · 1.62 goals / match - JDFS Alberts

Super Nova II scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova II scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

JDFS Alberts scoring profile: very strong

JDFS Alberts scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

20Goals scored (season)28
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
19Goals conceded (season)21
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
3Average goals in match3.77
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
8Goals scored (last 5)13
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
11Goals conceded (last 5)8
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal85%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
46%2 goals54%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
23%3 goals38%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
0%4 goals23%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal85%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
23%2 goals46%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
15%3 goals15%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
8%4 goals15%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time23%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
0%BTTS in both halves8%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
23%Scored in both halves23%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS69%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
80%BTTS - last 560%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time31%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time77%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Super Nova II is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.62 pts / match - Super Nova II · 1.31 pts / match - JDFS Alberts

Super Nova II - half-time state
38% leading46% draw15% trailing
JDFS Alberts - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.62Points per match (1st half)1.31
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
0.69Goals scored (1st half)0.77
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
0.69Goals conceded (1st half)0.77
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.54
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
77%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
46%No goal before half-time62%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts

After half-time (2nd half)

1.23Points per match (2nd half)1.77
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
0.85Goals scored (2nd half)1.38
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
1.62Average goals (2nd half)2.23
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
31%Clean sheet after half-time23%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts
46%No goal after half-time31%
Super Nova IIJDFS Alberts

Super Nova II - second-half results

23% W54% R23% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JDFS Alberts - second-half results

46% W38% R15% P
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Super Nova II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match2.01.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-4+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
JDFS Alberts - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.81.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.42.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Super Nova II
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
4
3
16-30
3
4
31-45
4
2
46-60
3
1
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

JDFS Alberts
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
5
31-45
2
6
46-60
8
5
61-75
8
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.38
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
73%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Super Nova II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

JDFS Alberts

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Super Nova IILigaJDFS Alberts
Average goals in match 3.003.43 3.77
Both teams scored 69%60% 77%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%68% 77%
Clean sheets 23%23% 15%
Goal before half-time 62%71% 62%
Goal after half-time 77%84% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.43
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Super Nova II vs JDFS Alberts?

The 1. Liga match finished Super Nova II 2:1 JDFS Alberts. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova II vs JDFS Alberts?

Super Nova II score 1.54 goals per game on average and JDFS Alberts 2.15. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Super Nova II's matches and 77% of JDFS Alberts's.

What form are Super Nova II and JDFS Alberts in?

Over the last 5 games Super Nova II have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and JDFS Alberts 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova II vs JDFS Alberts?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Super Nova II vs JDFS Alberts: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.