Super Nova II vs Leevon / PPK: match statistics
Super Nova II vs Leevon / PPK: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Super Nova II play Leevon / PPK in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 26 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 2:3.
Current form
Super Nova II: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Leevon / PPK: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Super Nova II scores 1.58 and concedes 1.42 goals per match. Leevon / PPK scores 1.58 and concedes 1.33. League average: 3.48 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Super Nova II 67%, Leevon / PPK 67%. Over 2.5: Super Nova II 42%, Leevon / PPK 67%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 68%.
xG, shots and style
Leevon / PPK has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.26. Super Nova II: 8.5 shots per match, Leevon / PPK: 11.9.
Match halves
Super Nova II: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.92. Leevon / PPK: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 1.08.
Goals by minute
Super Nova II: 16-30 (4 goals). Leevon / PPK: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.48 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 68%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
Leevon / PPK holds a clear advantage in chance creation — away xG averages 1.82 versus the hosts' 0.84, and the visitors average 15 shots per game (5.33 on target) compared to Super Nova II’s just 5 shots (2 on target). Defensively Leevon / PPK also performs better: they concede only 0.33 goals per away match and register clean sheets in 67% of games, whereas the hosts concede 1.0 goal on average and have no clean sheets at home. The home side are effective offensively at home — scoring 2.5 goals per game, with a 100% home win rate and 0% matches without a goal — but their xG of 0.84 suggests this high finishing rate may be unsustainable. Form-wise Leevon / PPK have won 3 of their last 5 and average 2.2 points per game over that span, while Super Nova II average 2.0 points and have 2 wins in their last 5. Considering superior xG (1.82 vs 0.84), higher shot volume (15 vs 5) and stronger defense (0.33 vs 1.0), I project an away win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Super Nova II | Leevon / PPK | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Super Nova II is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Super Nova II · 0.8 pts / match - Leevon / PPK
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Leevon / PPK is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.42 goals / match - Super Nova II · 1.33 goals / match - Leevon / PPK
Super Nova II scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Leevon / PPK keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).
Leevon / PPK scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Super Nova II
Over / Under — Leevon / PPK
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Super Nova II is 111% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / match - Super Nova II · 0.83 pts / match - Leevon / PPK
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Super Nova II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Leevon / PPK - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Super Nova II
Leevon / PPK
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Super Nova II | Liga | Leevon / PPK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.00 | 3.48 | ▼ 2.92 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 62% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 68% | • 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 22% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 71% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 85% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Super Nova II vs Leevon / PPK?
The 1. Liga match finished Super Nova II 2:3 Leevon / PPK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova II vs Leevon / PPK?
Super Nova II score 1.58 goals per game on average and Leevon / PPK 1.58. The 1. Liga average is 3.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Super Nova II's matches and 67% of Leevon / PPK's.
What form are Super Nova II and Leevon / PPK in?
Over the last 5 games Super Nova II have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Leevon / PPK 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova II vs Leevon / PPK?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.