Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of September 06, 2026

Super Nova II vs Mārupe: match statistics

Super Nova II crest
Super Nova II
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Mārupe crest
Mārupe

Super Nova II vs Mārupe: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Super Nova II played against Mārupe in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on May 2, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Super Nova II has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Mārupe has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Super Nova II scores 1.80 goals per game and allows 1.40. Mārupe scores 2.20 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 3.62 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 100% of Super Nova II's games and 40% of Mārupe's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 80%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 73% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Mārupe has the higher season xG average, 1.78 to 1.28 per game. Super Nova II takes 7.0 shots per game, while Mārupe takes 13.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Super Nova II leads at halftime in 60% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Mārupe leads at halftime in 40% and scores 1.80 after halftime.

When the teams score

Super Nova II's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For Mārupe, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1. Liga games average 3.62 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 73% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win: Super Nova II average 2.33 goals per home game and has failed to score in 0% of home matches, whereas Mārupe average only 0.5 goals on the road and failed to score in 50% of away fixtures. Hosts convert 25% of chances with an average of 8 shots and 5 on target per home match, while the visitors average 10.5 shots with just 5% efficiency, indicating more attempts but fewer finishes. In terms of chance quality Mārupe have a higher away xG (1.44) than Super Nova II at home (1.23), but the hosts are more efficient at turning chances into goals (2.33 vs 0.5 average goals). Over the last 5 matches Super Nova II scored 9 goals and average 1.6 points per game, while Mārupe scored 11 goals and average 1.4 points per game, which shows the visitors create actions but underperform in points. Additionally the edge is compounded by Super Nova II’s 67% home win rate versus Mārupe’s 0% away win rate, so I assign the higher probability to the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistical analysis indicates that 'Both Teams To Score' is more likely to be NO. Super Nova II average 3.33 goals per home match and keep a clean sheet in 67% of games; BTTS occurs only in 33% of their home fixtures, suggesting hosts frequently win without conceding. Mārupe average 0.5 goals on the road with a shot conversion of just 5%, while Super Nova II convert 21% of shots, so Mārupe’s realistic chance of scoring is low. Although the league BTTS rate is high at 62% and Super Nova II’s last 5 home matches all ended BTTS (100%), the hosts’ xG advantage (2.01 xG vs 1.22 xG for Mārupe) and the high clean sheet percentage for the hosts (67%) support a 'No Goal/No Goal' outcome. I assess 60% for no BTTS (No) and 40% for BTTS (Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Super Nova II scores on average 3.33 goals per game at home and has xG_for 2.01 with 6.0 shots on target and a 21% conversion rate, while Mārupe averages only 0.5 goals with xG_for 1.44 and a 5% conversion. Averaging the home attack (xG 2.01) with the away defense (xG against 1.22) yields an expectation of ~1.62 goals for Super Nova II, and similarly (xG 1.44 vs xG against 0.94) about 1.19 for Mārupe, i.e. ~2.81 goals total. A Poisson model on a 2.81 total gives roughly 77% for Over 1.5 and ~53% for Over 2.5, however seasonal indicators boost these figures: Super Nova II home matches finished Over 2.5 in 100% of cases, and the league Over 2.5 rate is 74%. Additionally, the last 5 matches show Over 2.5 in 60% for the home side and 80% for the away side, and the hosts’ high efficiency (6 shots on target and 21% conversion) increases the chance of more goals, so I raised the Over 2.5 estimate to ~78%. Since the expected 2.81 goals is still below 3.5 and the hosts have 67% clean sheets, Over 3.5 is less certain; therefore I recommend betting Over 2.5 as the strongest signal among the available lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario I foresee is 1/1 – the home side leads at the break and ultimately wins. Super Nova II averages 3.33 goals per game versus Mārupe’s 0.5, has an xG of 2.01 compared to the visitors’ 1.44, and registers 15.67 shots (6.0 on target) at a 21% conversion rate, while the visitors average 10.5 shots (5.0 on target) with only a 5% conversion. At half-time the home team scores an average of 0.67 goals and were leading in 2 of 3 matches (67%), and over the last five matches they average 1.0 first-half goal and led at the break in 60% of cases, indicating a strong start. The hosts win 67% of home matches, whereas Mārupe have not recorded a win (0%) and draw 50%, so Super Nova II’s advantage should hold through to the end; therefore 1/1 carries the highest weight in the projection.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

42Possession (%)58
Super Nova IIMārupe
11Shots7
Super Nova IIMārupe
1Shots on target4
Super Nova IIMārupe
1.02xG1.11
Super Nova IIMārupe
2Corners9
Super Nova IIMārupe
35Dangerous attacks51
Super Nova IIMārupe
-1Fouls-1
Super Nova IIMārupe
-1Cards-1
Super Nova IIMārupe

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Super Nova IIMārupe
1.8Goals scored / game2.2
Super Nova IIMārupe
1.4Goals allowed / game1
Super Nova IIMārupe
36%Average possession53%
Super Nova IIMārupe
3.6Shots on target / game5.6
Super Nova IIMārupe

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7Shots per game13.6
Super Nova IIMārupe
3.6Shots on target5.6
Super Nova IIMārupe
25.7%Shot conversion16.2%
Super Nova IIMārupe
36%Possession53%
Super Nova IIMārupe
1.28xG for1.78
Super Nova IIMārupe
1.76xG against1.06
Super Nova IIMārupe

Shooting quality

Super Nova II: Counter-attackingMārupe: Efficient finishing
Super Nova IIMārupe
Accuracy (shots on target)51%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Super Nova II is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Super Nova II · 1.4 pts / game - Mārupe

Super Nova II
WDWDL
Season result split
40% W40% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%
Mārupe
WWDLL
Season result split
40% W20% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
DL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mārupe is 22% better for: goals scored per game.

1.8 goals / game - Super Nova II · 2.2 goals / game - Mārupe

Mārupe is 40% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.4 goals / game - Super Nova II · 1 goals / game - Mārupe

Super Nova II scoring profile: strong

Super Nova II scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 meczów), while Mārupe keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 meczów).

Mārupe scoring profile: very strong

Mārupe scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 meczów).

9Goals scored (season)11
Super Nova IIMārupe
7Goals conceded (season)5
Super Nova IIMārupe
3.2Average goals per game3.2
Super Nova IIMārupe
9Goals scored (last 5)11
Super Nova IIMārupe
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Super Nova IIMārupe

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal80%
Super Nova IIMārupe
60%2 goals60%
Super Nova IIMārupe
20%3 goals40%
Super Nova IIMārupe
0%4 goals40%
Super Nova IIMārupe

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal40%
Super Nova IIMārupe
20%2 goals40%
Super Nova IIMārupe
20%3 goals20%
Super Nova IIMārupe
0%4 goals0%
Super Nova IIMārupe

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time0%
Super Nova IIMārupe
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Super Nova IIMārupe
40%Scored in both halves40%
Super Nova IIMārupe

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Super Nova IIMārupe
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS40%
Super Nova IIMārupe
100%BTTS - last 540%
Super Nova IIMārupe

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Super Nova IIMārupe
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Super Nova IIMārupe
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Super Nova IIMārupe

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Super Nova IIMārupe
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time80%
Super Nova IIMārupe
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time80%
Super Nova IIMārupe

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Super Nova II is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.2 pts / game - Super Nova II · 1.6 pts / game - Mārupe

Super Nova II - half-time state
60% leading40% draw0% trailing
Mārupe - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.2Points per game (1st half)1.6
Super Nova IIMārupe
1Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Super Nova IIMārupe
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.2
Super Nova IIMārupe
1.4Average goals (1st half)0.6
Super Nova IIMārupe
80%Clean sheet before half-time80%
Super Nova IIMārupe
20%No goal before half-time60%
Super Nova IIMārupe

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.6
Super Nova IIMārupe
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)1.8
Super Nova IIMārupe
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
Super Nova IIMārupe
1.8Average goals (2nd half)2.6
Super Nova IIMārupe
0%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Super Nova IIMārupe
40%No goal after half-time20%
Super Nova IIMārupe

Super Nova II - second-half results

20% W40% R40% P
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 40%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Mārupe - second-half results

40% W40% R20% P
8
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Super Nova II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.00
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game1.41.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Mārupe - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.60
Goals scored / game0.41.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.8
Average goals per game0.62.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%80%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Super Nova II
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
3
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Mārupe
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
3
3
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.20
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Super Nova II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.88
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Mārupe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.72
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
140%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
49%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.4
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Super Nova IILigaMārupe
Average goals per game 3.203.62 3.20
Both teams scored 100%62% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%73% 80%
Clean sheets 0%23% 60%
Goal before half-time 80%76% 60%
Goal after half-time 100%84% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.62
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
2.05
Home goals / game
1.57
Away goals / game
+31%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defensive advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
62%
2 goals
41%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Super Nova II vs Mārupe?

The 1. Liga match finished Super Nova II 0:1 Mārupe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova II vs Mārupe?

Super Nova II score 1.80 goals per game on average and Mārupe 2.20. The 1. Liga average is 3.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Super Nova II's matches and 40% of Mārupe's.

What form are Super Nova II and Mārupe in?

Over the last 5 games Super Nova II have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Mārupe 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova II vs Mārupe?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Super Nova II vs Mārupe: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.