Super Nova II vs Mārupe: match statistics
Super Nova II vs Mārupe: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Super Nova II play Mārupe in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 2 May 2026 at 16:30. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Super Nova II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Mārupe: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Super Nova II scores 1.54 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Mārupe scores 1.69 and concedes 1.46. League average: 3.43 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Super Nova II 69%, Mārupe 46%. Over 2.5: Super Nova II 46%, Mārupe 77%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.
xG, shots and style
Mārupe has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.19. Super Nova II: 7.9 shots per match, Mārupe: 9.5.
Match halves
Super Nova II: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.85. Mārupe: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 1.31.
Goals by minute
Super Nova II: 16-30 (4 goals). Mārupe: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
I back the home win: Super Nova II average 2.33 goals per home game and has failed to score in 0% of home matches, whereas Mārupe average only 0.5 goals on the road and failed to score in 50% of away fixtures. Hosts convert 25% of chances with an average of 8 shots and 5 on target per home match, while the visitors average 10.5 shots with just 5% efficiency, indicating more attempts but fewer finishes. In terms of chance quality Mārupe have a higher away xG (1.44) than Super Nova II at home (1.23), but the hosts are more efficient at turning chances into goals (2.33 vs 0.5 average goals). Over the last 5 matches Super Nova II scored 9 goals and average 1.6 points per game, while Mārupe scored 11 goals and average 1.4 points per game, which shows the visitors create actions but underperform in points. Additionally the edge is compounded by Super Nova II’s 67% home win rate versus Mārupe’s 0% away win rate, so I assign the higher probability to the hosts.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Super Nova II | Mārupe | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Super Nova II is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Super Nova II · 0.6 pts / match - Mārupe
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mārupe is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.54 goals / match - Super Nova II · 1.69 goals / match - Mārupe
Super Nova II scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Mārupe keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).
Mārupe scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Super Nova II
Over / Under — Mārupe
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Super Nova II is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.62 pts / match - Super Nova II · 1.08 pts / match - Mārupe
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Super Nova II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Mārupe - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Super Nova II
Mārupe
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Super Nova II | Liga | Mārupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.00 | 3.43 | ▼ 3.15 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 60% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 46% | 68% | ▲ 77% |
| Clean sheets | • 23% | 23% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 71% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 84% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Super Nova II vs Mārupe?
The 1. Liga match finished Super Nova II 0:1 Mārupe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova II vs Mārupe?
Super Nova II score 1.54 goals per game on average and Mārupe 1.69. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Super Nova II's matches and 46% of Mārupe's.
What form are Super Nova II and Mārupe in?
Over the last 5 games Super Nova II have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Mārupe 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova II vs Mārupe?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Super Nova II vs Mārupe: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.