Super Nova vs FS Jelgava: match statistics
FS Jelgava exhibits a clearly superior form compared to Super Nova, which is corroborated by the points per game average over the last five fixtures (1.4 vs 1.0). The visitors remain undefeated this season with one win and zero losses, whereas the hosts have already suffered one defeat without registering a win. Super Nova sits much lower in the standings (8th place) compared to FS Jelgava (4th place), reflecting the quality gap between the two sides. The visitors' recent form (ddddw) indicates stability and a win in their latest match, while Super Nova concludes their streak with results of ddlwl, highlighting inconsistency. Given the advantage in overall goal difference (7:6 for the visitors vs 7:7 for the hosts) and better point-scoring efficiency, FS Jelgava has a realistic chance of an away win, although a draw cannot be ruled out given the tendency of both teams to share points.
Super Nova vs FS Jelgava: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Super Nova played against FS Jelgava in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on March 15, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Super Nova has 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. FS Jelgava has 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Super Nova scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 2.00. FS Jelgava scores 2.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Super Nova's games and 100% of FS Jelgava's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 100%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FS Jelgava has the higher season xG average, 1.42 to 1.25 per game. Super Nova takes 8.0 shots per game, while FS Jelgava takes 10.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Super Nova leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. FS Jelgava leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Super Nova's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (1 goals). For FS Jelgava, it is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Virsliga games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FS Jelgava exhibits a clearly superior form compared to Super Nova, which is corroborated by the points per game average over the last five fixtures (1.4 vs 1.0). The visitors remain undefeated this season with one win and zero losses, whereas the hosts have already suffered one defeat without registering a win. Super Nova sits much lower in the standings (8th place) compared to FS Jelgava (4th place), reflecting the quality gap between the two sides. The visitors' recent form (ddddw) indicates stability and a win in their latest match, while Super Nova concludes their streak with results of ddlwl, highlighting inconsistency. Given the advantage in overall goal difference (7:6 for the visitors vs 7:7 for the hosts) and better point-scoring efficiency, FS Jelgava has a realistic chance of an away win, although a draw cannot be ruled out given the tendency of both teams to share points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Super Nova | FS Jelgava | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 50% | 50% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FS Jelgava is 100% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Super Nova · 2 goals / game - FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.
2 goals / game - Super Nova · 1 goals / game - FS Jelgava
Super Nova scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 meczów).
FS Jelgava scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Super Nova
Over / Under - FS Jelgava
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Super Nova - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
FS Jelgava - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 100% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Super Nova
FS Jelgava
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Super Nova | Liga | FS Jelgava | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.63 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 50% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 50% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 25% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 75% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 88% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Super Nova's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses against FS Jelgava. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Super Nova vs FS Jelgava?
The Virsliga match finished Super Nova 1:1 FS Jelgava. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Super Nova and FS Jelgava?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Super Nova won 0, FS Jelgava won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova vs FS Jelgava?
Super Nova score 1.00 goals per game on average and FS Jelgava 2.00. The Virsliga average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Super Nova's matches and 100% of FS Jelgava's.
What form are Super Nova and FS Jelgava in?
Over the last 5 games Super Nova have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and FS Jelgava 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova vs FS Jelgava?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Super Nova vs FS Jelgava: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.