Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 17 July 2026

Super Nova vs Tukums: match statistics

Super Nova crest
Super Nova
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Tukums crest
Tukums

Super Nova vs Tukums: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Super Nova play Tukums in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 11 May 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Super Nova: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Tukums: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Super Nova scores 1.05 and concedes 1.59 goals per match. Tukums scores 1.68 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.99 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Super Nova 64%, Tukums 91%. Over 2.5: Super Nova 59%, Tukums 77%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Tukums has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.15. Super Nova: 8.6 shots per match, Tukums: 12.1.

Match halves

Super Nova: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.45. Tukums: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Super Nova: 76-90+ (6 goals). Tukums: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 3-2-1. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 83%.

Match description

I back an away win (Tukums). Over the season Tukums scored 23 goals versus Super Nova’s 11, and in the last 5 matches the visitors have 15 goals compared to the hosts’ 3. Tukums’ offensive superiority is supported by numbers: on average 9.5 shots and 3.25 on target per game with a 16% conversion rate, versus Super Nova’s 8.25 shots, 2.75 on target and 12% conversion. Form and points efficiency also favor the visitors — Tukums averages 1.6 points over the last 5 matches while Super Nova averages only 0.6 and has won just once in the last five (goal difference 3:7). Both defenses are vulnerable: the hosts concede 2.25 goals at home on average, the visitors 2.0 away, with similar xG 1.07 (Super Nova) vs 1.15 (Tukums), indicating Tukums creates slightly better chances and converts them more often. Given 0% home wins for Super Nova and a negative goal difference for them (-5 vs -2 for Tukums), I estimate probabilities at 60% for the visitors, 25% for a draw and 15% for the hosts.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
Super NovaTukums
5Shots19
Super NovaTukums
3Shots on target8
Super NovaTukums
0.82xG2.26
Super NovaTukums
2Corners8
Super NovaTukums
39Dangerous attacks70
Super NovaTukums
10Fouls17
Super NovaTukums
3Cards2
Super NovaTukums

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.05Goals scored / match1.68
Super NovaTukums
1.59Goals conceded / match2
Super NovaTukums
45%Average possession44%
Super NovaTukums
3.45Shots on target / match4.86
Super NovaTukums

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.64Shots per match12.09
Super NovaTukums
3.45Shots on target4.86
Super NovaTukums
12.1%Shot conversion13.9%
Super NovaTukums
45%Possession44%
Super NovaTukums
1.15xG for1.45
Super NovaTukums
1.68xG against1.65
Super NovaTukums

Shooting quality

Super Nova: Counter-attackingTukums: Counter-attacking
Super NovaTukums
Accuracy (shots on target)40%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Super Nova is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Super Nova · 0.6 pts / match - Tukums

Super Nova
DLLWL
Season result split
32% W14% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-12
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-7
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
WLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Tukums
WLLLL
Season result split
14% W36% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-11
0.77 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-4-7
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tukums is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.05 goals / match - Super Nova · 1.68 goals / match - Tukums

Super Nova is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.59 goals / match - Super Nova · 2 goals / match - Tukums

Super Nova scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 22 matches).

Tukums scoring profile: very strong

Tukums scores in 95% of matches (21 of 22 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

23Goals scored (season)37
Super NovaTukums
35Goals conceded (season)44
Super NovaTukums
2.64Average goals in match3.68
Super NovaTukums
4Goals scored (last 5)7
Super NovaTukums
10Goals conceded (last 5)13
Super NovaTukums

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal95%
Super NovaTukums
23%2 goals32%
Super NovaTukums
5%3 goals18%
Super NovaTukums
0%4 goals9%
Super NovaTukums

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal95%
Super NovaTukums
50%2 goals64%
Super NovaTukums
14%3 goals36%
Super NovaTukums
9%4 goals5%
Super NovaTukums

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

32%BTTS at half-time41%
Super NovaTukums
0%BTTS in both halves9%
Super NovaTukums
9%Scored in both halves27%
Super NovaTukums

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS68%
Super NovaTukums
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Super NovaTukums
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Super NovaTukums

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time91%
Super NovaTukums
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time68%
Super NovaTukums
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
Super NovaTukums

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
Super NovaTukums
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
Super NovaTukums
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Super NovaTukums

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Super Nova is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.05 pts / match - Super Nova · 1 pts / match - Tukums

Super Nova - half-time state
18% leading50% draw32% trailing
Tukums - half-time state
23% leading32% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per match (1st half)1
Super NovaTukums
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.82
Super NovaTukums
0.86Goals conceded (1st half)1.09
Super NovaTukums
1.45Average goals (1st half)1.91
Super NovaTukums
50%Clean sheet before half-time27%
Super NovaTukums
55%No goal before half-time41%
Super NovaTukums

After half-time (2nd half)

1.14Points per match (2nd half)1.18
Super NovaTukums
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
Super NovaTukums
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.91
Super NovaTukums
1.18Average goals (2nd half)1.77
Super NovaTukums
45%Clean sheet after half-time27%
Super NovaTukums
59%No goal after half-time36%
Super NovaTukums

Super Nova - second-half results

32% W18% R50% P
23
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding178%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tukums - second-half results

27% W36% R36% P
22
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding61%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Super Nova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Tukums - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.4
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
12
31-45
3
6
46-60
1
3
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
4
11
16-30
10
8
31-45
4
8
46-60
3
7
61-75
12
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.16
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
78%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

Super NovaLigaTukums
Average goals in match 2.642.99 3.68
Both teams scored 64%57% 91%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%55% 77%
Clean sheets 18%23% 5%
Goal before half-time 64%75% 91%
Goal after half-time 86%85% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.31
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Super Nova 3 - 2 - 1 Tukums. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 83% matches.

FK Tukums 2000
1 : 2
SK Super Nova
FK Tukums 2000
1 : 2
SK Super Nova
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 1
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
1 : 0
FK Tukums 2000
SK Super Nova
1 : 1
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 2
SK Super Nova

FAQ

What was the result of Super Nova vs Tukums?

The Virsliga match finished Super Nova 1:1 Tukums. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Super Nova and Tukums?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Super Nova won 3, Tukums won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 83% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova vs Tukums?

Super Nova score 1.05 goals per game on average and Tukums 1.68. The Virsliga average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Super Nova's matches and 91% of Tukums's.

What form are Super Nova and Tukums in?

Over the last 5 games Super Nova have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Tukums 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova vs Tukums?

The statistical background for Super Nova vs Tukums — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.