Suwon vs Gimpo Citizen: match statistics
Suwon vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Suwon play Gimpo Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 26 April 2026 at 07:00. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Suwon: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Gimpo Citizen: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Suwon scores 2.12 and concedes 1.35 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen scores 1.18 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Suwon 82%, Gimpo Citizen 53%. Over 2.5: Suwon 82%, Gimpo Citizen 35%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Suwon has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.52. Suwon: 12.9 shots per match, Gimpo Citizen: 12.3.
Match halves
Suwon: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 1.24. Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.65.
Goals by minute
Suwon: 76-90+ (11 goals). Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
Suwon is the match favorite as the home side: at home they average 2.33 goals per game, have a 67% win rate and remain unbeaten at home (0% losses), and have scored 14 goals this season versus Gimpo’s 10. In attack Suwon’s home xG is 1.60 compared to Gimpo’s away xG of 1.58, but the hosts’ edge comes from higher shot efficiency (conversion 17% vs 11%) and 0% of matches without a goal (0% vs 29%), which increases their reliability in finding the net. On the other hand Gimpo defends solidly away — they concede 1.00 goal per game on average and keep 43% clean sheets, while Suwon concede 1.33 at home and have no clean sheets at home. In the last 5 fixtures Suwon scored 7 and conceded 9 with an average of 1.4 points per game, while Gimpo scored 6 and conceded 6 with an average of 1.2 points per game, indicating Suwon’s offensive advantage but Gimpo’s greater defensive stability. As a result I tip a home win, although a draw remains a realistic outcome if the visitors maintain effective defending.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Suwon | Gimpo Citizen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.48 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Suwon is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Suwon · 1 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Suwon is 80% better for: goals scored per match.
2.12 goals / match - Suwon · 1.18 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen
Gimpo Citizen is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.35 goals / match - Suwon · 1.12 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen
Suwon scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).
Gimpo Citizen scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Suwon keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Suwon
Over / Under — Gimpo Citizen
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Suwon is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.71 pts / match - Suwon · 1.24 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Suwon - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 47%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Gimpo Citizen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Suwon
Gimpo Citizen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Suwon | Liga | Gimpo Citizen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.47 | 2.75 | ▼ 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 82% | 61% | ▼ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 82% | 56% | ▼ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 12% | 24% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 94% | 73% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 76% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Suwon vs Gimpo Citizen?
The K League 2 match finished Suwon 1:1 Gimpo Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Suwon vs Gimpo Citizen?
Suwon score 2.12 goals per game on average and Gimpo Citizen 1.18. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 82% of Suwon's matches and 53% of Gimpo Citizen's.
What form are Suwon and Gimpo Citizen in?
Over the last 5 games Suwon have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Gimpo Citizen 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Suwon vs Gimpo Citizen?
The statistical background for Suwon vs Gimpo Citizen — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.