Suzhou Dongwu vs Meizhou Hakka: match statistics
Suzhou Dongwu vs Meizhou Hakka: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Suzhou Dongwu played against Meizhou Hakka in China League One (China). The game was played on August 2, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Suzhou Dongwu has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Meizhou Hakka has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Suzhou Dongwu scores 0.69 goals per game and allows 1.38. Meizhou Hakka scores 1.00 and allows 1.94. Games in this league average 2.65 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Suzhou Dongwu's games and 50% of Meizhou Hakka's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 69%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Suzhou Dongwu has the higher season xG average, 1.24 to 1.13 per game. Suzhou Dongwu takes 9.0 shots per game, while Meizhou Hakka takes 8.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Suzhou Dongwu leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.44 goals per game after halftime. Meizhou Hakka leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.44 after halftime.
When the teams score
Suzhou Dongwu's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For Meizhou Hakka, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
China League One games average 2.65 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Meizhou Hakka holds a clear edge in recent form: they have scored 7 goals and recorded 2 wins in their last 5 matches, while Suzhou Dongwu have managed only 4 goals and failed to win any of their last five. Suzhou generate more opportunities at home (avg. 11.25 shots and 1.54 xG per game), but convert them less efficiently — home shooting accuracy is 7% versus 10% for away teams. In practice Meizhou turns efficiency into points: the visitors average 1.2 points in the last 5 matches compared to Suzhou’s 0.6. Defensively both teams are vulnerable — conceding on average 1.63 goals per game, and over the season Meizhou have conceded 31 goals versus Suzhou’s 22, which points to an open game with chances for both sides. Considering Meizhou’s superior recent efficiency and greater goal output (16 goals this season vs. Suzhou’s 11), I predict an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I rate BTTS - Yes at 68% vs 32% for No, because the season and last-5 stats favor both teams scoring. Suzhou Dongwu concedes on average 2.25 goals per match this season, has a season BTTS of 63% and only 13% clean sheets at home, which strongly supports opponent goals. Meizhou Hakka has a season BTTS of 38% and 25% clean sheets away, but in the last 5 matches both teams recorded BTTS in 60% each, so recent form narrows the visitors’ season gap. In terms of chances, Suzhou generates xG 1.20 on the season (1.42 in last 5), Meizhou xG 1.06 on the season (1.36 in last 5), with xG against of 1.28 and 1.81 respectively, indicating a significant number of opportunities for both sides. Additionally, 88% of Suzhou’s home matches finish over 2.5 goals, and the combination of over2.5 and BTTS for Suzhou is 63%, so overall I favor the Yes scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects 1.51 goals for Suzhou (attack average 1.20 and Meizhou’s conceded average 1.81) and 1.17 for Meizhou (attack average 1.06 and Suzhou’s conceded average 1.28), totaling 2.68 goals. Season metrics confirm a propensity for goals: Suzhou has 100% of matches over 1.5, Meizhou 75% (avg ~88%), and on the 2.5 line Suzhou 88% vs Meizhou 50%, favoring the Over side. In the last 5 matches Over 2.5 occurred in 60% for Suzhou and 80% for Meizhou (avg 70%), and the league records 2.59 goals per game, so the projected total 2.68 is above 2.5. Over 3.5 is less likely: season Over3.5 rates are 38% (Suzhou) and 25% (Meizhou) and the projected 2.68 is well below 3.5, therefore Under 3.5 has the edge (~69%). I therefore recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (88% chance), with Over 2.5 (68%) as an alternative for bettors accepting higher risk.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is the away side leading at the break and going on to win (2/2): the hosts were trailing at half-time in 7 of 8 matches this season (88%) and led at half-time in only 1 of 8 (13%), which strongly favors Meizhou Hakka at Half-Time. The hosts concede on average 1.50 goals in the first half while scoring 0.63, whereas the visitors score 0.50 and concede 0.75 by the break (concededAVGHT_home 1.5 vs concededAVGHT_away 0.75; scoredAVGHT_home 0.63 vs scoredAVGHT_away 0.5). In the last 5 matches the visitors scored 10 goals by half-time compared to 3 for the hosts (last5_GoalsHT_overall_away 10 vs last5_GoalsHT_overall_home 3; last5_scoredAVGHT_overall_away 1.0 vs 0.2), amplifying Meizhou’s advantage in the opening 45 minutes. Additionally, the visitors have a higher win rate this season (38% vs 25%) despite a slightly lower xG (1.06 vs 1.20), so I expect them to maintain the lead through Full-Time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Suzhou Dongwu | Meizhou Hakka | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Meizhou Hakka is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Suzhou Dongwu · 1.2 pts / game - Meizhou Hakka
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Meizhou Hakka is 45% better for: goals scored per game.
0.69 goals / game - Suzhou Dongwu · 1 goals / game - Meizhou Hakka
Suzhou Dongwu is 41% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.38 goals / game - Suzhou Dongwu · 1.94 goals / game - Meizhou Hakka
Suzhou Dongwu scores in 56% of games (9 of 16 meczów), while Meizhou Hakka keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 meczów).
Meizhou Hakka scores in 69% of games (11 of 16 meczów), while Suzhou Dongwu keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Suzhou Dongwu
Over / Under - Meizhou Hakka
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Suzhou Dongwu is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.94 pts / game - Suzhou Dongwu · 0.69 pts / game - Meizhou Hakka
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Suzhou Dongwu - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 13%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Meizhou Hakka - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Suzhou Dongwu
Meizhou Hakka
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Suzhou Dongwu | Liga | Meizhou Hakka | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.06 | 2.65 | ▲ 2.94 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 52% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 27% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 72% | ▲ 94% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 72% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Suzhou Dongwu's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Meizhou Hakka. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Suzhou Dongwu vs Meizhou Hakka?
The China League One match finished Suzhou Dongwu 1:0 Meizhou Hakka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Suzhou Dongwu vs Meizhou Hakka?
Suzhou Dongwu score 0.69 goals per game on average and Meizhou Hakka 1.00. The China League One average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Suzhou Dongwu's matches and 50% of Meizhou Hakka's.
What form are Suzhou Dongwu and Meizhou Hakka in?
Over the last 5 games Suzhou Dongwu have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Meizhou Hakka 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Suzhou Dongwu vs Meizhou Hakka?
The statistical background for Suzhou Dongwu vs Meizhou Hakka — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.