Poland - 3 Liga Group 1Data current as of 17 July 2026

Swit vs Olimpia Elbląg: match statistics

Swit crest
Swit
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Olimpia Elbląg crest
Olimpia Elbląg

Swit vs Olimpia Elbląg: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Swit play Olimpia Elbląg in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match date is 3 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Swit: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Olimpia Elbląg: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Swit scores 1.50 and concedes 1.94 goals per match. Olimpia Elbląg scores 1.26 and concedes 1.88. League average: 3.33 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Swit 59%, Olimpia Elbląg 65%. Over 2.5: Swit 65%, Olimpia Elbląg 59%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Swit: 6.9 shots per match, Olimpia Elbląg: 7.2.

Match halves

Swit: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.79. Olimpia Elbląg: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.59.

Goals by minute

Swit: 76-90+ (16 goals). Olimpia Elbląg: 0-15 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3 Liga Group 1: 3.33 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I project a home win for Świt: at home they average 1.75 goals scored and 1.08 conceded per match, while Olimpia Elbląg away average 1.36 goals scored and 2.18 conceded. The gap is visible in results — Świt wins 50% of home matches vs Olimpia’s 27% away win rate — and in the last 5 matches, where Świt scored 4 and conceded 7, while Olimpia scored 3 and conceded 11. In terms of quality of chances, Świt’s home xG is 1.23 vs Olimpia’s away xG of 1.15, while xG against is 1.47 for Świt and 1.77 for Olimpia, indicating the visitors allow more high-value opportunities. Additionally, Świt averages 3.6 shots on target and 52% possession at home, compared to Olimpia’s 3.14 shots on target and 46% possession away, giving the hosts better control and more quality chances. Considering these figures and recent form over the last 5 matches (Świt 0.8 pts/match vs Olimpia 0.6), I assign a 60% probability to a Świt win, 20% to a draw and 20% to an Olimpia victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
13Shots9
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
5Shots on target3
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
1.84xG1.4
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
8Corners8
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
92Dangerous attacks85
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
-1Fouls-1
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
-1Cards-1
SwitOlimpia Elbląg

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

SwitOlimpia Elbląg
1.5Goals scored / match1.26
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
1.94Goals conceded / match1.88
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
39%Average possession35%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
2.68Shots on target / match2.53
SwitOlimpia Elbląg

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.88Shots per match7.15
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
2.68Shots on target2.53
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
21.8%Shot conversion17.7%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
39%Possession35%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
1.29xG for1.29
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
1.64xG against1.5
SwitOlimpia Elbląg

Shooting quality

Swit: Counter-attackingOlimpia Elbląg: Counter-attacking
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
Accuracy (shots on target)39%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.560.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Swit is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Swit · 0.4 pts / match - Olimpia Elbląg

Swit
WWLLL
Season result split
35% W15% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-17
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-7
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.85BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Olimpia Elbląg
LLDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
26% W24% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-17
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-8
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Swit is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Swit · 1.26 goals / match - Olimpia Elbląg

Swit scoring profile: very strong

Swit scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Olimpia Elbląg keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).

Olimpia Elbląg scoring profile: very strong

Olimpia Elbląg scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 34 matches).

51Goals scored (season)43
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
66Goals conceded (season)64
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
3.44Average goals in match3.15
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
9Goals scored (last 5)4
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
10Goals conceded (last 5)10
SwitOlimpia Elbląg

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal79%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
41%2 goals32%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
24%3 goals12%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
6%4 goals3%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal82%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
53%2 goals56%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
35%3 goals35%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
15%4 goals12%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time24%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
9%BTTS in both halves6%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
24%Scored in both halves18%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
60%BTTS - last 560%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
32%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Swit - half-time state
26% leading38% draw35% trailing
Olimpia Elbląg - half-time state
26% leading35% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per match (1st half)1.15
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.65
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)0.85
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.5
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
44%Clean sheet before half-time50%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
56%No goal before half-time53%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.09
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.59
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
0.97Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
1.76Average goals (2nd half)1.53
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
41%Clean sheet after half-time44%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg
47%No goal after half-time53%
SwitOlimpia Elbląg

Swit - second-half results

35% W24% R41% P
40
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Olimpia Elbląg - second-half results

26% W29% R44% P
39
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Swit - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.60
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Olimpia Elbląg - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.40.6
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-5-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Swit
ScoredConceded
9
8
0-15
7
10
16-30
8
15
31-45
8
11
46-60
3
10
61-75
16
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Olimpia Elbląg
ScoredConceded
9
7
0-15
5
10
16-30
9
15
31-45
6
13
46-60
7
11
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-39%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Swit

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Olimpia Elbląg

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).

Teams vs league

SwitLigaOlimpia Elbląg
Average goals in match 3.443.33 3.15
Both teams scored 59%62% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%66% 59%
Clean sheets 21%20% 18%
Goal before half-time 76%74% 74%
Goal after half-time 82%83% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.33
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.51
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Swit 0 - 1 - 0 Olimpia Elbląg. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

ZKS Olimpia Elbląg
1 : 1
MKS Swit Nowy Dwór Mazowiecki

FAQ

What was the result of Swit vs Olimpia Elbląg?

The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Swit 0:1 Olimpia Elbląg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Swit vs Olimpia Elbląg?

Swit score 1.50 goals per game on average and Olimpia Elbląg 1.26. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Swit's matches and 65% of Olimpia Elbląg's.

What form are Swit and Olimpia Elbląg in?

Over the last 5 games Swit have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Olimpia Elbląg 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Swit vs Olimpia Elbląg?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Swit vs Olimpia Elbląg: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.