Swit vs Widzew Łódź II: match statistics
Swit has a clear advantage as the host, winning 50% of home matches and conceding an average of only 1.2 goals per game at home. Widzew Łódź II presents very poor away form, keeping not a single clean sheet and conceding as many as 2.89 goals per match on the road. The difference in goal difference is significant: Swit has +7 in home matches, while Widzew II has -9 away. The form of the last five matches also speaks in favor of the hosts (0.8 PPG vs 1.2 PPG), although Widzew showed a victory recently. The xG statistics confirm Swit's advantage (1.29 vs 1.2 for the guests, with Widzew conceding significantly more according to xGA 2.32). Taking all factors into account, a victory for the hosts is the most likely scenario, although the unpredictability of both teams and their average overall form leave room for a draw or a surprise by the guests.
Swit vs Widzew Łódź II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Swit played against Widzew Łódź II in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Swit has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Widzew Łódź II has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Swit scores 1.55 goals per game and allows 1.85. Widzew Łódź II scores 1.95 and allows 2.47. Games in this league average 3.45 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 55% of Swit's games and 63% of Widzew Łódź II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 70% and 79%, compared with league averages of 65% for BTTS and 67% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Widzew Łódź II has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 1.25 per game. Swit takes 6.0 shots per game, while Widzew Łódź II takes 9.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Swit leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.85 goals per game after halftime. Widzew Łódź II leads at halftime in 42% and scores 0.79 after halftime.
When the teams score
Swit's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Widzew Łódź II, it is minutes 31-45+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
3 Liga Group 1 games average 3.45 goals. Both teams score in 65% of games, and 67% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Swit has a clear advantage as the host, winning 50% of home matches and conceding an average of only 1.2 goals per game at home. Widzew Łódź II presents very poor away form, keeping not a single clean sheet and conceding as many as 2.89 goals per match on the road. The difference in goal difference is significant: Swit has +7 in home matches, while Widzew II has -9 away. The form of the last five matches also speaks in favor of the hosts (0.8 PPG vs 1.2 PPG), although Widzew showed a victory recently. The xG statistics confirm Swit's advantage (1.29 vs 1.2 for the guests, with Widzew conceding significantly more according to xGA 2.32). Taking all factors into account, a victory for the hosts is the most likely scenario, although the unpredictability of both teams and their average overall form leave room for a draw or a surprise by the guests.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Swit | Widzew Łódź II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 47% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.21 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.62 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Widzew Łódź II is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Swit · 1.2 pts / game - Widzew Łódź II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Widzew Łódź II is 26% better for: goals scored per game.
1.55 goals / game - Swit · 1.95 goals / game - Widzew Łódź II
Swit is 34% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.85 goals / game - Swit · 2.47 goals / game - Widzew Łódź II
Swit scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 games), while Widzew Łódź II keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 games).
Widzew Łódź II scores in 79% of games (15 of 19 games), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Swit
Over / Under - Widzew Łódź II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Widzew Łódź II is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / game - Swit · 1.47 pts / game - Widzew Łódź II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Swit - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Widzew Łódź II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 37%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 3.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 100% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Swit
Widzew Łódź II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).
Teams vs league
| Swit | Liga | Widzew Łódź II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.40 | 3.45 | ▲ 4.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 55% | 65% | ▼ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 70% | 67% | ▲ 79% |
| Clean sheets | • 20% | 20% | ▼ 16% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 76% | ▲ 95% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 86% | ▼ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- SwitGoalMichał Kucharczyk
Head-to-head
Record from Swit's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Widzew Łódź II. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Swit vs Widzew Łódź II?
The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Swit 1:0 Widzew Łódź II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Swit vs Widzew Łódź II?
Swit score 1.55 goals per game on average and Widzew Łódź II 1.95. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Swit's matches and 63% of Widzew Łódź II's.
What form are Swit and Widzew Łódź II in?
Over the last 5 games Swit have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Widzew Łódź II 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Swit vs Widzew Łódź II?
The statistical background for Swit vs Widzew Łódź II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.