Szeged 2011 vs Vasas: match statistics
Szeged 2011 vs Vasas: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Szeged 2011 played against Vasas in NB II (Hungary). The game was played on April 5, 2026. Final score: 0:4.
Recent form
Szeged 2011 has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Vasas has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Szeged 2011 scores 1.09 goals per game and allows 1.00. Vasas scores 1.87 and allows 0.78. Games in this league average 2.52 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 39% of Szeged 2011's games and 30% of Vasas's. The Over 2.5 rates are 35% and 43%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 43% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Vasas has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.53 per game. Szeged 2011 takes 12.0 shots per game, while Vasas takes 13.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Szeged 2011 leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.65 goals per game after halftime. Vasas leads at halftime in 39% and scores 0.91 after halftime.
When the teams score
Szeged 2011's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). For Vasas, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NB II games average 2.52 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 43% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Vasas appears to be the favorite in this match based on markedly superior season metrics and current form. The visitors have 15 wins and 43 goals scored this season versus Szeged’s 8 wins and 25 goals, indicating a clear attacking edge. In the last 5 matches Vasas scored 13 goals and averages 2.6 points per match, while Szeged scored 6 goals and averages 1.4 points; additionally Vasas conceded only 1 goal in those five games compared to Szeged’s 5. On the road Vasas concedes 0.45 goals on average and records 64% clean sheets, versus Szeged conceding 1.00 goals at home and 36% clean sheets, and the visitors average 4.55 shots on target compared to the hosts’ 3.64. xG is 1.77 for Szeged at home and 1.61 for Vasas away, which implies the hosts create slightly more expected chances, however Vasas’s superiority in efficiency and defensive stability favors an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Vasas has a seasonal BTTS rate of only 18% and 20% in the last 5 matches, while Szeged records 42% seasonally and 60% in the last 5, indicating an asymmetry in responsibility for both goals. Vasas' defense is key: seasonally they concede on average 0.45 goals per match and have 64% clean sheets, and in the last 5 matches they conceded an average of 0.2 goals, which significantly reduces BTTS likelihood. Szeged at home scores on average 2.25 goals per match, has xG 1.85, 14.25 shots and 5.83 shots on target on average, so the attack is present, but Vasas has 18 goals conceded this season and the last 5 matches with xG against 0.65 point to a tough opponent to break down. Additionally both teams have high clean sheet percentages: Szeged 58% and Vasas 64%, and the league BTTS rate is 48%, so statistically it is safer to back No Goal. Considering Vasas' low seasonal BTTS (18%), high CS (64%) and the last 5 matches with an average of 0.2 goals conceded, I assess the chance at 'No' 70% and 'Yes' 30%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Szeged averages 2.25 goals per match, Vasas 1.45, totaling 3.70 goals between the two teams. xG analysis: Szeged 1.85 versus 0.95 xG conceded by Vasas yields ~1.40 expected goals for the home side, and Vasas 1.61 versus 1.03 conceded by Szeged yields ~1.32 for the away side, totaling 2.72 xG. A Poisson model with λ=2.72 indicates roughly a 76% probability for Over 1.5, about 51% for Over 2.5 and around 29% for Over 3.5. Seasonal rates corroborate this view: Szeged has 75% of matches Over 1.5 and 50% Over 2.5, Vasas 55% and 36% respectively, and both teams show high Over 0.5 rates (92% and 82%). Considering the combined xG of 2.72, recent form (Vasas 13 goals in last 5, Szeged 6) and Szeged’s superior conversion (16% vs 11%), the strongest pick is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistical analysis identifies the strongest signal as the 2/1 scenario (away leading at half-time, home winning at full-time). Away teams led at the break in 55% of matches (leadingAtHTPercentage_away = 55%) and conceded on average only 0.18 goals in the first half (concededAVGHT_away = 0.18), while home teams led at half-time in only 25% of cases (leadingAtHTPercentage_home = 25%). At the same time, home teams dominate after the break: they score on average 1.33 goals in the second half (scored_2hg_avg_home = 1.33), have at least one goal after the break in 92% of matches (over05_2hg_percentage_home = 92%) and win the second half in 75% of cases (wins_2hg_percentage_home = 75%). Seasonally, home teams score more (2.25 goals per match versus 1.45 for away teams, seasonScoredAVG_home 2.25 vs seasonScoredAVG_away 1.45) and have higher xG (1.85 vs 1.61), which confirms their ability to create chances and mount a comeback. As a result, the strongest signal is away leading at the break with a home turnaround after the break, hence the recommendation HT/FT = '2/1'.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Szeged 2011 | Vasas | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Vasas is 86% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Szeged 2011 · 2.6 pts / game - Vasas
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vasas is 72% better for: goals scored per game.
1.09 goals / game - Szeged 2011 · 1.87 goals / game - Vasas
Vasas is 28% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Szeged 2011 · 0.78 goals / game - Vasas
Szeged 2011 scores in 65% of games (15 of 23 meczów), while Vasas keeps a clean sheet in 61% (14 of 23 meczów).
Vasas scores in 78% of games (18 of 23 meczów), while Szeged 2011 keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Szeged 2011
Over / Under - Vasas
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Vasas is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Szeged 2011 · 1.61 pts / game - Vasas
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Szeged 2011 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Vasas - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 65%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +8 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Szeged 2011
Vasas
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).
Teams vs league
| Szeged 2011 | Liga | Vasas | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.09 | 2.52 | ▲ 2.65 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 39% | 47% | ▼ 30% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 35% | 43% | • 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 29% | ▲ 61% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 70% | • 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 80% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Szeged 2011's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Vasas. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Szeged 2011 vs Vasas?
The NB II match finished Szeged 2011 0:4 Vasas. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Szeged 2011 vs Vasas?
Szeged 2011 score 1.09 goals per game on average and Vasas 1.87. The NB II average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Szeged 2011's matches and 30% of Vasas's.
What form are Szeged 2011 and Vasas in?
Over the last 5 games Szeged 2011 have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Vasas 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Szeged 2011 vs Vasas?
The statistical background for Szeged 2011 vs Vasas — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.