Hungary - NB IIData current as of 23 July 2026

Szeged 2011 vs Videoton: match statistics

Szeged 2011 crest
Szeged 2011
0 : 3half-time 0:2
Videoton crest
Videoton

Szeged 2011 vs Videoton: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Szeged 2011 play Videoton in NB II (Hungary). The match date is 19 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Szeged 2011: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Videoton: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Szeged 2011 scores 0.97 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. Videoton scores 1.23 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.51 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Szeged 2011 33%, Videoton 47%. Over 2.5: Szeged 2011 37%, Videoton 37%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Szeged 2011 has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.38. Szeged 2011: 10.9 shots per match, Videoton: 9.9.

Match halves

Szeged 2011: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60. Videoton: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

Szeged 2011: 46-60 (10 goals). Videoton: 46-60 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB II: 2.51 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I predict an away win (Videoton). Videoton this season has 9 wins, 9 draws and 7 losses with 32 goals scored, while Szeged 2011 has 8 wins, 8 draws, 9 losses and 26 goals; Videoton sits 6th in the table, Szeged 10th. In their last five matches Videoton have scored 7, conceded 3 and remain unbeaten (2 wins, 3 draws) averaging 1.8 points per game, whereas Szeged in the same period scored 5, conceded 7 and have a 2-1-2 record averaging 1.4 points per game. Statistically Szeged at home generates higher expected goals (xG 1.68) and more possession (53%), but actually scores only 1.25 goals per home match and has 25% of home games without scoring; Videoton away have xG 1.44, score 1.33 goals, average 3.8 shots on target and have a lower share of goalless matches (17%). Considering the visitors’ better form and efficiency over the last five matches (7–3 in goals, 1.8 pts per game) and the small seasonal offensive differentials, I favor Videoton with approximate probabilities: 42% win, 30% draw and 28% home victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Szeged 2011Videoton
11Shots9
Szeged 2011Videoton
1Shots on target5
Szeged 2011Videoton
1.42xG1.38
Szeged 2011Videoton
3Corners2
Szeged 2011Videoton
85Dangerous attacks60
Szeged 2011Videoton
13Fouls16
Szeged 2011Videoton
2Cards1
Szeged 2011Videoton

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.97Goals scored / match1.23
Szeged 2011Videoton
1.13Goals conceded / match1.1
Szeged 2011Videoton
50%Average possession45%
Szeged 2011Videoton
3.07Shots on target / match3.4
Szeged 2011Videoton

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.87Shots per match9.93
Szeged 2011Videoton
3.07Shots on target3.4
Szeged 2011Videoton
8.9%Shot conversion12.4%
Szeged 2011Videoton
50%Possession45%
Szeged 2011Videoton
1.46xG for1.38
Szeged 2011Videoton
1.32xG against1.42
Szeged 2011Videoton

Shooting quality

Szeged 2011: BalancedVideoton: Counter-attacking
Szeged 2011Videoton
Accuracy (shots on target)28%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Szeged 2011 is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Szeged 2011 · 0.6 pts / match - Videoton

Szeged 2011
LLDWL
Season result split
30% W30% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-12
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-6
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%
Videoton
WLLLL
Season result split
33% W30% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-9-11
1.30 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-7
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Videoton is 27% better for: goals scored per match.

0.97 goals / match - Szeged 2011 · 1.23 goals / match - Videoton

Szeged 2011 scoring profile: mixed

Szeged 2011 scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Videoton keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

Videoton scoring profile: strong

Videoton scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Szeged 2011 keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

29Goals scored (season)37
Szeged 2011Videoton
34Goals conceded (season)33
Szeged 2011Videoton
2.1Average goals in match2.33
Szeged 2011Videoton
3Goals scored (last 5)5
Szeged 2011Videoton
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
Szeged 2011Videoton

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal73%
Szeged 2011Videoton
23%2 goals27%
Szeged 2011Videoton
10%3 goals10%
Szeged 2011Videoton
7%4 goals7%
Szeged 2011Videoton

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
Szeged 2011Videoton
27%2 goals30%
Szeged 2011Videoton
13%3 goals13%
Szeged 2011Videoton
7%4 goals0%
Szeged 2011Videoton

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

3%BTTS at half-time17%
Szeged 2011Videoton
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Szeged 2011Videoton
10%Scored in both halves23%
Szeged 2011Videoton

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
Szeged 2011Videoton
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Szeged 2011Videoton
0%BTTS - last 540%
Szeged 2011Videoton

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
Szeged 2011Videoton
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
Szeged 2011Videoton
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Szeged 2011Videoton

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Szeged 2011Videoton
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Szeged 2011Videoton
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Szeged 2011Videoton

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Videoton is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.97 pts / match - Szeged 2011 · 1.6 pts / match - Videoton

Szeged 2011 - half-time state
20% leading37% draw43% trailing
Videoton - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.97Points per match (1st half)1.6
Szeged 2011Videoton
0.37Goals scored (1st half)0.67
Szeged 2011Videoton
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
Szeged 2011Videoton
0.87Average goals (1st half)1.1
Szeged 2011Videoton
53%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Szeged 2011Videoton
77%No goal before half-time47%
Szeged 2011Videoton

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.2
Szeged 2011Videoton
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
Szeged 2011Videoton
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Szeged 2011Videoton
1.23Average goals (2nd half)1.23
Szeged 2011Videoton
60%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Szeged 2011Videoton
57%No goal after half-time57%
Szeged 2011Videoton

Szeged 2011 - second-half results

33% W40% R27% P
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Videoton - second-half results

30% W30% R40% P
48
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding83%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Szeged 2011 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Videoton - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Szeged 2011
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
3
5
16-30
6
7
31-45
10
3
46-60
3
6
61-75
5
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Videoton
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
6
5
16-30
10
3
31-45
12
5
46-60
5
4
61-75
0
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.21
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-55%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Szeged 2011

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Videoton

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).

Teams vs league

Szeged 2011LigaVideoton
Average goals in match 2.102.51 2.33
Both teams scored 33%48% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%45% 37%
Clean sheets 33%29% 33%
Goal before half-time 67%70% 73%
Goal after half-time 70%80% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.51
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Szeged 2011 0 - 0 - 1 Videoton. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Videoton FC Fehérvár
1 : 0
Szeged 2011 FC

FAQ

What was the result of Szeged 2011 vs Videoton?

The NB II match finished Szeged 2011 0:3 Videoton. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Szeged 2011 vs Videoton?

Szeged 2011 score 0.97 goals per game on average and Videoton 1.23. The NB II average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Szeged 2011's matches and 47% of Videoton's.

What form are Szeged 2011 and Videoton in?

Over the last 5 games Szeged 2011 have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Videoton 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Szeged 2011 vs Videoton?

The statistical background for Szeged 2011 vs Videoton — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.