Hungary - NB IIData current as of September 12, 2026

Szeged 2011 vs Videoton: match statistics

Szeged 2011 crest
Szeged 2011
0 : 3half-time 0:2
Videoton crest
Videoton

Szeged 2011 vs Videoton: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Szeged 2011 played against Videoton in NB II (Hungary). The game was played on April 19, 2026. Final score: 0:3.

Recent form

Szeged 2011 has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Videoton has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Szeged 2011 scores 1.04 goals per game and allows 1.12. Videoton scores 1.28 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.54 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 40% of Szeged 2011's games and 48% of Videoton's. The Over 2.5 rates are 36% and 32%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Szeged 2011 has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.37 per game. Szeged 2011 takes 11.5 shots per game, while Videoton takes 9.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Szeged 2011 leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.64 goals per game after halftime. Videoton leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.64 after halftime.

When the teams score

Szeged 2011's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). For Videoton, it is minutes 46-60 (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

NB II games average 2.54 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict an away win (Videoton). Videoton this season has 9 wins, 9 draws and 7 losses with 32 goals scored, while Szeged 2011 has 8 wins, 8 draws, 9 losses and 26 goals; Videoton sits 6th in the table, Szeged 10th. In their last five matches Videoton have scored 7, conceded 3 and remain unbeaten (2 wins, 3 draws) averaging 1.8 points per game, whereas Szeged in the same period scored 5, conceded 7 and have a 2-1-2 record averaging 1.4 points per game. Statistically Szeged at home generates higher expected goals (xG 1.68) and more possession (53%), but actually scores only 1.25 goals per home match and has 25% of home games without scoring; Videoton away have xG 1.44, score 1.33 goals, average 3.8 shots on target and have a lower share of goalless matches (17%). Considering the visitors’ better form and efficiency over the last five matches (7–3 in goals, 1.8 pts per game) and the small seasonal offensive differentials, I favor Videoton with approximate probabilities: 42% win, 30% draw and 28% home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal stats paint a mixed picture: Szeged has only 31% of matches with both teams scoring and keeps a clean sheet in 54% of games with an average of 0.62 goals conceded per match, while Videoton records 67% BTTS matches and averages 1.33 goals scored and 1.42 conceded per game. In the last 5 fixtures Szeged averaged 1.0 goals scored and 1.4 conceded per match, whereas Videoton averaged 1.4 scored and 0.6 conceded, which increases the likelihood of both teams getting on the scoresheet. Additionally, xG favors the visitors — Videoton has xG for 1.44 versus Szeged xG against 1.08 — and the visitors average 12.2 shots per match with 11% conversion compared to the hosts’ 10.83 shots and 8% conversion. Szeged’s seasonal defensive edge (0.62 conceded and 54% clean sheets) is notable, but Videoton’s high season BTTS rate (67% vs Szeged 31%) and the visitors’ recent offensive form are the stronger signal. Therefore I assign 62% to BTTS - Yes and 38% to No, recommending the 'Yes' selection.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I expect Szeged to generate about 1.43 expected goals (xG) and Videoton about 1.12, totaling 2.55 expected goals. Both teams have a high share of matches over 1.5 goals: Szeged 62% at home and Videoton 83% away, averaging 72%, which increases the probability of at least two goals. Looking at xG: Szeged’s attacking xG is 1.33 and Videoton’s xG against is 1.73, translating to an estimated ~1.53 for the home side; similarly Videoton has attacking xG 1.44 and xG against versus Szeged 1.08 giving ~1.26; averaging seasonal values and xG leads to 1.43/1.12. A Poisson model with lambda=2.55 estimates ~47% chance for Over 2.5 goals and ~25% for Over 3.5, so the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (approx ~73% after accounting for seasonal shares and xG). Although Szeged has 54% clean sheets this season, Videoton’s greater tendency to exceed 1.5 goals away and the calculated xG support backing Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Szeged led at the break in 54% of their home matches and averages 0.77 goals by half-time, while Videoton has an HT average of 0.5, which strongly favors the home side after 45 minutes. The hosts have won the full match in 46% of home fixtures, whereas the visitors win only 25% of away games and concede an average of 1.42 goals per match compared to 0.62 conceded by Szeged, so the final advantage lies with Szeged. xG analysis shows Szeged generates 1.33 xG while Videoton allows 1.73 xG per match, indicating realistic opportunities for the hosts despite the visitors’ higher conversion rate (11% vs 8%). At the same time, the risk of a turnaround after the break is real: Videoton has an AVG_2hg_away of 1.75 and scores on average 0.83 goals in the second half, with their second halves ending with >0.5 goals in 100% of cases. Therefore the most likely scenario based on the data is Szeged leading at half-time and the hosts winning after 90 minutes (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

57Possession (%)43
Szeged 2011Videoton
11Shots9
Szeged 2011Videoton
1Shots on target5
Szeged 2011Videoton
1.42xG1.38
Szeged 2011Videoton
3Corners2
Szeged 2011Videoton
85Dangerous attacks60
Szeged 2011Videoton
13Fouls16
Szeged 2011Videoton
2Cards1
Szeged 2011Videoton

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Szeged 2011Videoton
1.04Goals scored / game1.28
Szeged 2011Videoton
1.12Goals allowed / game1
Szeged 2011Videoton
51%Average possession44%
Szeged 2011Videoton
3.44Shots on target / game3.24
Szeged 2011Videoton

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.48Shots per game9.92
Szeged 2011Videoton
3.44Shots on target3.24
Szeged 2011Videoton
9.1%Shot conversion12.9%
Szeged 2011Videoton
51%Possession44%
Szeged 2011Videoton
1.48xG for1.37
Szeged 2011Videoton
1.37xG against1.38
Szeged 2011Videoton

Shooting quality

Szeged 2011: BalancedVideoton: Counter-attacking
Szeged 2011Videoton
Accuracy (shots on target)30%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Videoton is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Szeged 2011 · 1.8 pts / game - Videoton

Szeged 2011
LWWLD
Season result split
32% W32% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-8-9
1.28 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-4
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LDDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Videoton
WDDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
36% W36% D28% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-7
1.44 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-5
Last 5 away
3-1-1
LWWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Videoton is 23% better for: goals scored per game.

1.04 goals / game - Szeged 2011 · 1.28 goals / game - Videoton

Videoton is 12% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.12 goals / game - Szeged 2011 · 1 goals / game - Videoton

Szeged 2011 scoring profile: strong

Szeged 2011 scores in 64% of games (16 of 25 meczów), while Videoton keeps a clean sheet in 36% (9 of 25 meczów).

Videoton scoring profile: strong

Videoton scores in 76% of games (19 of 25 meczów), while Szeged 2011 keeps a clean sheet in 32% (8 of 25 meczów).

26Goals scored (season)32
Szeged 2011Videoton
28Goals conceded (season)25
Szeged 2011Videoton
2.16Average goals per game2.28
Szeged 2011Videoton
5Goals scored (last 5)7
Szeged 2011Videoton
7Goals conceded (last 5)3
Szeged 2011Videoton

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal76%
Szeged 2011Videoton
24%2 goals28%
Szeged 2011Videoton
8%3 goals8%
Szeged 2011Videoton
8%4 goals8%
Szeged 2011Videoton

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal64%
Szeged 2011Videoton
24%2 goals24%
Szeged 2011Videoton
12%3 goals12%
Szeged 2011Videoton
8%4 goals0%
Szeged 2011Videoton

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time16%
Szeged 2011Videoton
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Szeged 2011Videoton
8%Scored in both halves24%
Szeged 2011Videoton

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
Szeged 2011Videoton
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Szeged 2011Videoton
40%BTTS - last 560%
Szeged 2011Videoton

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
Szeged 2011Videoton
12%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
Szeged 2011Videoton
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Szeged 2011Videoton

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Szeged 2011Videoton
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time28%
Szeged 2011Videoton
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
Szeged 2011Videoton

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Videoton is 74% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.92 pts / game - Szeged 2011 · 1.6 pts / game - Videoton

Szeged 2011 - half-time state
20% leading32% draw48% trailing
Videoton - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.92Points per game (1st half)1.6
Szeged 2011Videoton
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.64
Szeged 2011Videoton
0.52Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
Szeged 2011Videoton
0.92Average goals (1st half)1.08
Szeged 2011Videoton
48%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Szeged 2011Videoton
76%No goal before half-time48%
Szeged 2011Videoton

After half-time (2nd half)

1.52Points per game (2nd half)1.28
Szeged 2011Videoton
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
Szeged 2011Videoton
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
Szeged 2011Videoton
1.24Average goals (2nd half)1.2
Szeged 2011Videoton
64%Clean sheet after half-time56%
Szeged 2011Videoton
52%No goal after half-time52%
Szeged 2011Videoton

Szeged 2011 - second-half results

36% W44% D20% L
23
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding160%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Videoton - second-half results

32% W32% D36% L
40
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding90%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 36%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Szeged 2011 - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.60
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game0.81.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Videoton - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.40
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Szeged 2011
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
5
6
31-45
9
3
46-60
3
4
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Videoton
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
5
5
16-30
8
2
31-45
12
5
46-60
4
2
61-75
0
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.22
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-55%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Szeged 2011

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Videoton

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).

Teams vs league

Szeged 2011LigaVideoton
Average goals per game 2.162.54 2.28
Both teams scored 40%48% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%44% 32%
Clean sheets 32%29% 36%
Goal before half-time 72%70% 72%
Goal after half-time 68%81% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per game
48%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / game
1.19
Away goals / game
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defensive advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. VideotonGoalRoland Varga
  2. VideotonGoalDániel Németh
  3. VideotonYellow cardBenedek Murka
  4. VideotonSubstitutionOn: Márk DékeiOff: Roland Varga
  5. Szeged 2011SubstitutionOn: Dávid HolmanOff: Richárd Rabatin
  6. VideotonSubstitutionOn: Mario Lucas SimuțOff: Benedek Murka
  7. Szeged 2011SubstitutionOn: Áron BorvetőOff: Kristóf Tóth-Gábor
  8. Szeged 2011Yellow cardÁron Borvető
  9. VideotonGoalÁdám Somogyi
  10. Szeged 2011Yellow cardDávid Márkvárt
  11. Szeged 2011SubstitutionOn: Balázs BodnárOff: Domonkos Miskolczi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Tamás ÚjhelyiMatches officiated: 11
3.55Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 245%Home wins18%Draws36%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Szeged 2011's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Videoton. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Videoton FC Fehérvár
1 : 0
Szeged 2011 FC

FAQ

What was the result of Szeged 2011 vs Videoton?

The NB II match finished Szeged 2011 0:3 Videoton. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Szeged 2011 vs Videoton?

Szeged 2011 score 1.04 goals per game on average and Videoton 1.28. The NB II average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Szeged 2011's matches and 48% of Videoton's.

What form are Szeged 2011 and Videoton in?

Over the last 5 games Szeged 2011 have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Videoton 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Szeged 2011 vs Videoton?

The statistical background for Szeged 2011 vs Videoton — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.