Tabor Sežana vs Triglav: match statistics
Tabor Sežana vs Triglav: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tabor Sežana play Triglav in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 10 May 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Tabor Sežana: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Triglav: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tabor Sežana scores 1.23 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. Triglav scores 2.40 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tabor Sežana 40%, Triglav 37%. Over 2.5: Tabor Sežana 40%, Triglav 57%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Triglav has higher xG: 1.85 vs 1.58. Tabor Sežana: 12.0 shots per match, Triglav: 14.0.
Match halves
Tabor Sežana: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.73. Triglav: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.33.
Goals by minute
Tabor Sežana: 76-90+ (11 goals). Triglav: 76-90+ (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Triglav is the clear favorite: the visitors have 19 wins this season versus Tabor’s 14 and sit 3rd while the hosts are 5th. In their last 5 matches Triglav are 5/5, scoring 12 and conceding just 1, whereas Tabor have lost all 5, scoring 3 and conceding 10. The visitors are markedly more efficient — averaging 2.23 goals per away game with xG 1.75 and a conversion rate of 16%, versus the hosts’ 0.92 goals per game with xG 1.60 and 8% conversion. Tabor at home concedes only 0.62 on average and have 54% clean sheets, but the last 5 matches (10 goals conceded) and the lower average of shots on target (3.85 vs 5.23) indicate a temporary defensive weakness. Considering form (3 pts average in the last 5 for Triglav vs 0 for Tabor) and the +70–34 goal difference in favor of the visitors, I expect a Triglav victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tabor Sežana | Triglav | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Triglav is 233% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Tabor Sežana · 2 pts / match - Triglav
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Triglav is 95% better for: goals scored per match.
1.23 goals / match - Tabor Sežana · 2.4 goals / match - Triglav
Triglav is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.1 goals / match - Tabor Sežana · 0.93 goals / match - Triglav
Tabor Sežana scores in 80% of matches (24 of 30 matches), while Triglav keeps a clean sheet in 50% (15 of 30 matches).
Triglav scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Tabor Sežana keeps a clean sheet in 47% (14 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Tabor Sežana
Over / Under — Triglav
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Triglav is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Tabor Sežana · 1.8 pts / match - Triglav
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tabor Sežana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Triglav - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tabor Sežana
Triglav
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Tabor Sežana | Liga | Triglav | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.33 | 2.82 | ▲ 3.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 50% | ▼ 37% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 54% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 28% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 74% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 81% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Tabor Sežana 1 - 0 - 0 Triglav. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tabor Sežana vs Triglav?
The 2. SNL match finished Tabor Sežana 0:1 Triglav. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tabor Sežana vs Triglav?
Tabor Sežana score 1.23 goals per game on average and Triglav 2.40. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Tabor Sežana's matches and 37% of Triglav's.
What form are Tabor Sežana and Triglav in?
Over the last 5 games Tabor Sežana have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Triglav 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tabor Sežana vs Triglav?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.