Tacoma Defiance vs Whitecaps II: match statistics
Tacoma Defiance vs Whitecaps II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tacoma Defiance played Whitecaps II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 2 August 2026. Final score: 4:2.
Current form
Tacoma Defiance: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Whitecaps II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tacoma Defiance scores 1.25 and concedes 1.35 goals per match. Whitecaps II scores 1.29 and concedes 2.10. League average: 3.25 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tacoma Defiance 45%, Whitecaps II 71%. Over 2.5: Tacoma Defiance 55%, Whitecaps II 67%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Whitecaps II has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.36. Tacoma Defiance: 11.6 shots per match, Whitecaps II: 12.5.
Match halves
Tacoma Defiance: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80. Whitecaps II: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.76.
Goals by minute
Tacoma Defiance: 46-60 (10 goals). Whitecaps II: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.25 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-3. Average goals 4.40, BTTS 60%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I forecast a home win (1). Tacoma Defiance carry superior form and defensive edge: over the last 5 matches they averaged 2.0 points per game versus 0.8 for Whitecaps II. At home Tacoma concedes 1.0 goal on average with xG against 1.49, while Whitecaps II concede 2.4 goals away with xG against 1.92, yielding a clear defensive advantage for the hosts. Offensively Tacoma scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches and averages 1.18 goals per home game, whereas the visitors have only 5 goals in their last 5 and 1.1 goals per away game; the hosts also register 4.45 shots on target versus 4.0 for the visitors. Additionally Whitecaps II have no away wins (0% win rate) and lose 80% of away matches, while Tacoma win 45% of home games and keep 27% clean sheets; for these reasons I assess probabilities as 70% home, 18% draw and 12% away.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams display high BTTS rates: Tacoma 64% and Whitecaps II 80%, compared to the league average of 61%, which strongly indicates a Goal/Goal outcome. Chances of a No Goal from one side are low, with clean sheets only 9% for Tacoma and 10% for Whitecaps II, and average goals conceded this season at 1.82 and 2.40 respectively. Offensively Tacoma generates xG 1.80 with 13.18 shots and 4.73 shots on target per match; Whitecaps II record xG 1.43 with 11.8 shots and 4.0 on target. In the last 5 matches Tacoma averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, while Whitecaps averaged 1.0 scored and 2.0 conceded. Additionally, 64% of Tacoma’s matches and 70% of Whitecaps’ matches finish over 2.5 goals, and the combination of over 2.5 and BTTS occurs in 55% and 70% of fixtures respectively, reinforcing the both-sides-scoring forecast. Considering these figures (64% vs 80% BTTS, low 9%/10% clean sheets, high 1.82 and 2.40 goals conceded), I assess the probability of BTTS at around 78% and recommend a 'BTTS - Yes' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams produce a lot of goals — Tacoma have 91% of matches with over 1.5 goals, and Whitecaps II 80%, which strongly favors Over 1.5. Comparing xG: the home side have 1.8 xG in attack, the visitors concede on average 1.92 xG per match, yielding about 1.86 expected goals for Tacoma; Whitecaps II have 1.43 xG in attack versus 1.76 xG against, i.e. about 1.60 xG. The combined expected total is 3.46 goals and the high share of games over 2.5 (Tacoma 64%, Whitecaps II 70%, league 66%) and the frequency of BTTS (64% vs 80%) strengthen the signal for Over. Considering form over the last 5 matches (Tacoma score on average 1.8 goals, Whitecaps II 1.0; Tacoma concede 1.4, Whitecaps II concede 2.0), the strongest and most confident pick is Over 1.5 (approx. 92%). Over 2.5 also has value (approx. 74%), while Over 3.5 is less certain (~43%) due to seasonal rates of 45%/40% for results above 3.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I assess a half-time draw as the most likely outcome (approx. 47%), because the home side were level at the break in 45% of matches and the visitors in 50% — the weighted average yields about 47%. Tacoma led at the break in 27% of games and has a clear offensive edge: home xG is 1.80 versus the visitors’ 1.43, 4.73 shots on target versus 4.0 and a conversion rate of 11% versus 9%, which increases the chance of a goal after the break. Whitecaps II are defensively vulnerable — they concede 2.4 goals per game on the season and already average 1.3 goals conceded by half-time (concededAVGHT_away=1.3 vs concededAVGHT_home=0.64), so the risk of conceding after the break is significant. Additionally, Tacoma perform better in second halves: over the last 5 matches they averaged 1.6 points after the break and 1.0 goals, while Whitecaps II recorded 0.8 points and 0.6 goals, which favors the hosts in the closing stages. Therefore I select HT/FT X/1 (draw at half-time, Tacoma to win) as the strongest signal; I assign this scenario a 26% probability versus 24% for 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tacoma Defiance | Whitecaps II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tacoma Defiance is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Tacoma Defiance · 0.8 pts / match - Whitecaps II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tacoma Defiance is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.35 goals / match - Tacoma Defiance · 2.1 goals / match - Whitecaps II
Tacoma Defiance scores in 65% of matches (13 of 20 matches), while Whitecaps II keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 21 matches).
Whitecaps II scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Tacoma Defiance keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Tacoma Defiance
Over / Under — Whitecaps II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tacoma Defiance is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.15 pts / match - Tacoma Defiance · 0.9 pts / match - Whitecaps II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tacoma Defiance - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Whitecaps II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tacoma Defiance
Whitecaps II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Tacoma Defiance | Liga | Whitecaps II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.60 | 3.25 | ▲ 3.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 61% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 55% | 66% | • 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 21% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 75% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | • 85% | 84% | ▼ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Tacoma Defiance 2 - 0 - 3 Whitecaps II. Average goals 4.40, both teams scored in 60% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tacoma Defiance vs Whitecaps II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Tacoma Defiance 4:2 Whitecaps II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tacoma Defiance and Whitecaps II?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Tacoma Defiance won 2, Whitecaps II won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tacoma Defiance vs Whitecaps II?
Tacoma Defiance score 1.25 goals per game on average and Whitecaps II 1.29. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Tacoma Defiance's matches and 71% of Whitecaps II's.
What form are Tacoma Defiance and Whitecaps II in?
Over the last 5 games Tacoma Defiance have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Whitecaps II 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tacoma Defiance vs Whitecaps II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


