United States - USL ChampionshipAl Lang StadiumData current as of 24 July 2026

Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Charleston Battery: match statistics

Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Charleston Battery: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tampa Bay Rowdies play Charleston Battery in USL Championship (United States). The match date is 11 June 2026 at 01:00. Venue: Al Lang Stadium. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Tampa Bay Rowdies: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Charleston Battery: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tampa Bay Rowdies scores 1.56 and concedes 0.81 goals per match. Charleston Battery scores 1.94 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tampa Bay Rowdies 44%, Charleston Battery 50%. Over 2.5: Tampa Bay Rowdies 38%, Charleston Battery 56%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Tampa Bay Rowdies has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.61. Tampa Bay Rowdies: 16.0 shots per match, Charleston Battery: 13.1.

Match halves

Tampa Bay Rowdies: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 0.75. Charleston Battery: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Tampa Bay Rowdies: 76-90+ (9 goals). Charleston Battery: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 1-1-4. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Tampa Bay Rowdies as hosts display markedly superior metrics: at home they have 8 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, scoring an average of 2.4 goals per game and conceding 0.6, yielding a goal difference of +9 and 60% clean sheets. Charleston Battery away form is poor — they win only 20% of such matches, average 0.4 goals scored and concede 1.8, with 80% of away games without scoring and a goal difference of -7 on the road. The gap in chance creation is significant: Rowdies average 15.4 shots and 6.4 on target per home match with xG 1.76, while Charleston register 9.2 shots and 3.2 on target with xG 1.25 away, but a low conversion rate of 4% means chances do not translate into goals. Additionally Tampa Bay have won 5 of their last 5 matches overall and scored 12 goals while conceding just 1 in their last 5 home games, whereas the visitors have a last-5 away record of 1 win and 4 losses, indicating a trend favoring the hosts. Based on this I predict a home win; I assess probabilities as 80% for a Tampa Bay triumph, 12% for a draw and 8% for a Charleston win, primarily due to the advantage in shots on target (6.4 vs 3.2), conversion rate (16% vs 4%) and superior clean sheet rate (60% vs 20%).

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
12Shots11
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
5Shots on target5
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
1.46xG1.43
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
5Corners3
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
49Dangerous attacks53
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
20Fouls10
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
4Cards1
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
1.56Goals scored / match1.94
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
0.81Goals conceded / match1.38
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
54%Average possession56%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
4.63Shots on target / match5.44
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16Shots per match13.06
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
4.63Shots on target5.44
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
9.8%Shot conversion14.8%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
54%Possession56%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
1.77xG for1.61
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
1.14xG against1.27
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

Shooting quality

Tampa Bay Rowdies: AttackingCharleston Battery: Efficient finishing
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
Accuracy (shots on target)29%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Charleston Battery is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies · 2 pts / match - Charleston Battery

Tampa Bay Rowdies
DLWLD
Season result split
56% W31% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-2
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.08Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Charleston Battery
WWWLD
Season result split
50% W19% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-5
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Charleston Battery is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

1.56 goals / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies · 1.94 goals / match - Charleston Battery

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 70% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.81 goals / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies · 1.38 goals / match - Charleston Battery

Tampa Bay Rowdies scoring profile: very strong

Tampa Bay Rowdies scores in 94% of matches (15 of 16 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).

Charleston Battery scoring profile: mixed

Charleston Battery scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Tampa Bay Rowdies keeps a clean sheet in 50% (8 of 16 matches).

25Goals scored (season)31
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
13Goals conceded (season)22
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
2.38Average goals in match3.31
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
6Goals scored (last 5)15
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

How often they score at least...

94%1 goal69%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
44%2 goals56%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
19%3 goals31%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
0%4 goals25%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal81%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
19%2 goals38%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
6%3 goals13%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
6%4 goals6%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

44%
Tampa Bay Rowdies - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 16 matches
50%
Charleston Battery - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 16 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time13%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
19%Scored in both halves38%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
60%BTTS - last 580%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies · 1.69 pts / match - Charleston Battery

Tampa Bay Rowdies - half-time state
56% leading31% draw13% trailing
Charleston Battery - half-time state
44% leading38% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.69
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
0.81Goals scored (1st half)0.94
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
0.31Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.38
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
81%Clean sheet before half-time69%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
44%No goal before half-time56%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.56
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)1
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
1.25Average goals (2nd half)1.94
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
56%Clean sheet after half-time31%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery
44%No goal after half-time38%
Tampa Bay RowdiesCharleston Battery

Tampa Bay Rowdies - second-half results

38% W38% R25% P
32
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Charleston Battery - second-half results

44% W25% R31% P
27
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tampa Bay Rowdies - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Charleston Battery - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match1.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+6+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tampa Bay Rowdies
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
1
16-30
4
1
31-45
3
3
46-60
0
0
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Charleston Battery
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.84
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+29%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tampa Bay Rowdies

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Charleston Battery

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Tampa Bay RowdiesLigaCharleston Battery
Average goals in match 2.382.79 3.31
Both teams scored 44%58% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%52% 56%
Clean sheets 50%26% 19%
Goal before half-time 69%67% 63%
Goal after half-time 75%80% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Tampa Bay Rowdies 1 - 1 - 4 Charleston Battery. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Charleston Battery
1 : 1
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Tampa Bay Rowdies
1 : 3
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
2 : 1
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Charleston Battery
2 : 1
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Charleston Battery
3 : 1
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Tampa Bay Rowdies
4 : 2
Charleston Battery

FAQ

What was the result of Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Charleston Battery?

The USL Championship match finished Tampa Bay Rowdies 2:2 Charleston Battery. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tampa Bay Rowdies and Charleston Battery?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Tampa Bay Rowdies won 1, Charleston Battery won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Charleston Battery?

Tampa Bay Rowdies score 1.56 goals per game on average and Charleston Battery 1.94. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Tampa Bay Rowdies's matches and 50% of Charleston Battery's.

What form are Tampa Bay Rowdies and Charleston Battery in?

Over the last 5 games Tampa Bay Rowdies have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Charleston Battery 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Charleston Battery?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Charleston Battery: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.