Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad: match statistics
Abu Qair Semad occupies 3rd place in the table and presents significantly better form than Tanta SC (15th position). The guests have an impressive record of 50% wins on away grounds and a positive goal difference (+4), while the hosts have won just 11% of matches at home with a negative balance of -3. Abu Qair Semad averages 4.63 shots on target per away match with a conversion of 16%, which is twice as good as Tanta SC (2.71 shots on target, 8% conversion). The hosts fail to score in 33% of home matches, which, combined with the guests' solid defense (average 1 goal conceded away, 30% clean sheets), puts them in a disadvantageous position. xG statistics also favor Abu Qair Semad (1.37 vs 1.07), confirming their qualitative advantage. Taking all factors into account, the guests are the clear favorite in this meeting.
Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Tanta SC played against Abu Qair Semad in Second Division (Egypt). The game was played on January 22, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Tanta SC has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Abu Qair Semad has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Tanta SC scores 0.63 goals per game and allows 0.95. Abu Qair Semad scores 1.26 and allows 0.79. Games in this league average 1.91 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 47% of Tanta SC's games and 42% of Abu Qair Semad's. The Over 2.5 rates are 16% and 37%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 31% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Abu Qair Semad has the higher season xG average, 1.44 to 1.16 per game. Tanta SC takes 6.7 shots per game, while Abu Qair Semad takes 7.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Tanta SC leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.21 goals per game after halftime. Abu Qair Semad leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.68 after halftime.
When the teams score
Tanta SC's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). For Abu Qair Semad, it is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 1.91 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 31% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Abu Qair Semad occupies 3rd place in the table and presents significantly better form than Tanta SC (15th position). The guests have an impressive record of 50% wins on away grounds and a positive goal difference (+4), while the hosts have won just 11% of matches at home with a negative balance of -3. Abu Qair Semad averages 4.63 shots on target per away match with a conversion of 16%, which is twice as good as Tanta SC (2.71 shots on target, 8% conversion). The hosts fail to score in 33% of home matches, which, combined with the guests' solid defense (average 1 goal conceded away, 30% clean sheets), puts them in a disadvantageous position. xG statistics also favor Abu Qair Semad (1.37 vs 1.07), confirming their qualitative advantage. Taking all factors into account, the guests are the clear favorite in this meeting.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Tanta SC | Abu Qair Semad | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 48% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Abu Qair Semad is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Tanta SC · 1.6 pts / game - Abu Qair Semad
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Abu Qair Semad is 100% better for: goals scored per game.
0.63 goals / game - Tanta SC · 1.26 goals / game - Abu Qair Semad
Abu Qair Semad is 20% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.95 goals / game - Tanta SC · 0.79 goals / game - Abu Qair Semad
Tanta SC scores in 53% of games (10 of 19 meczów), while Abu Qair Semad keeps a clean sheet in 42% (8 of 19 meczów).
Abu Qair Semad scores in 74% of games (14 of 19 meczów), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tanta SC
Over / Under - Abu Qair Semad
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tanta SC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 11%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Abu Qair Semad - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Tanta SC
Abu Qair Semad
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Tanta SC | Liga | Abu Qair Semad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.58 | 1.91 | ▲ 2.05 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 47% | 40% | ▲ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 16% | 31% | ▲ 37% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 26% | 38% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 53% | 51% | ▲ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 58% | 69% | • 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Tanta SC's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Abu Qair Semad. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad?
The Second Division match finished Tanta SC 1:1 Abu Qair Semad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad?
Tanta SC score 0.63 goals per game on average and Abu Qair Semad 1.26. The Second Division average is 1.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Tanta SC's matches and 42% of Abu Qair Semad's.
What form are Tanta SC and Abu Qair Semad in?
Over the last 5 games Tanta SC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Abu Qair Semad 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.