Tanta SC vs Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates a high probability of a draw in this fixture. Tanta SC present very poor home form with just an 8% win rate at home and only 0.67 goals per game on average, making them one of the weakest teams in the league (18th place). Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat are on an impressive streak of five consecutive draws, confirming their defensive stability (42% clean sheets away). Both teams have a negative goal difference in their respective matches, and recent results show a tendency for low-scoring affairs - the hosts scored only 3 goals in their last 5 games, and the visitors just 2. The xG stats are very close for both sides (Tanta 1.23 vs Maleyet 1.22), further validating their evenly matched offensive power. Considering the hosts' poor form, the visitors' defensive mindset, and their mutual goalscoring issues, a draw appears to be the most likely outcome of this encounter.
Tanta SC vs Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Tanta SC played against Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat in Second Division (Egypt). The game was played on March 12, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Tanta SC has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat has 0 wins, 5 draws and 0 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Tanta SC scores 0.64 goals per game and allows 1.00. Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat scores 0.92 and allows 0.84. Games in this league average 1.84 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 52% of Tanta SC's games and 32% of Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat's. The Over 2.5 rates are 16% and 20%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 28% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat has the higher season xG average, 1.27 to 1.23 per game. Tanta SC takes 6.9 shots per game, while Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat takes 6.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Tanta SC leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.24 goals per game after halftime. Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.44 after halftime.
When the teams score
Tanta SC's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). For Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 1.84 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 28% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates a high probability of a draw in this fixture. Tanta SC present very poor home form with just an 8% win rate at home and only 0.67 goals per game on average, making them one of the weakest teams in the league (18th place). Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat are on an impressive streak of five consecutive draws, confirming their defensive stability (42% clean sheets away). Both teams have a negative goal difference in their respective matches, and recent results show a tendency for low-scoring affairs - the hosts scored only 3 goals in their last 5 games, and the visitors just 2. The xG stats are very close for both sides (Tanta 1.23 vs Maleyet 1.22), further validating their evenly matched offensive power. Considering the hosts' poor form, the visitors' defensive mindset, and their mutual goalscoring issues, a draw appears to be the most likely outcome of this encounter.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Tanta SC | Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat is 67% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Tanta SC · 1 pts / game - Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat is 44% better for: goals scored per game.
0.64 goals / game - Tanta SC · 0.92 goals / game - Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat
Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat is 19% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Tanta SC · 0.84 goals / game - Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat
Tanta SC scores in 56% of games (14 of 25 games), while Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat keeps a clean sheet in 44% (11 of 25 games).
Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat scores in 60% of games (15 of 25 games), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tanta SC
Over / Under - Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tanta SC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 8%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Tanta SC
Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Tanta SC | Liga | Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.64 | 1.84 | • 1.76 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 52% | 38% | ▼ 32% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 16% | 28% | ▼ 20% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 40% | ▲ 44% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 52% | 50% | ▲ 52% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 66% | ▼ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Tanta SC's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Tanta SC vs Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat?
The Second Division match finished Tanta SC 1:0 Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tanta SC vs Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat?
Tanta SC score 0.64 goals per game on average and Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat 0.92. The Second Division average is 1.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Tanta SC's matches and 32% of Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat's.
What form are Tanta SC and Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat in?
Over the last 5 games Tanta SC have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat 0-5-0 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanta SC vs Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat?
The statistical background for Tanta SC vs Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


