Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of October 16, 2026

Tanta SC vs Olympic El Qanah: match statistics

Tanta SC crest
Tanta SC
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Olympic El Qanah crest
Olympic El Qanah
115%(4.91)
X20%(3.20)
265%(1.71)

Olympic El Qanah is the decisive favorite for this encounter, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 15 wins, 7 draws, and only 1 defeat. The visitors present phenomenal away form with a 75% win rate and just 0.08 goals conceded on average per away match, resulting in 92% clean sheets. Tanta SC sits in the relegation zone in 17th position, with only 9% of home matches won and a negative goal difference (-5) in home games. The form of the last five matches unequivocally favors the visitors (2.6 points per game vs 0.8 for the hosts), and the difference in offensive (1.42 vs 0.73 goals per game) and defensive quality is immense. Olympic El Qanah's advantage in xG statistics, shot conversion, and consistency in gaining points makes an away victory the most probable scenario.

Tanta SC vs Olympic El Qanah: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Tanta SC played against Olympic El Qanah in Second Division (Egypt). The game was played on February 26, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Tanta SC has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Olympic El Qanah has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Tanta SC scores 0.65 goals per game and allows 1.00. Olympic El Qanah scores 1.57 and allows 0.43. Games in this league average 1.85 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 52% of Tanta SC's games and 35% of Olympic El Qanah's. The Over 2.5 rates are 17% and 30%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 29% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Olympic El Qanah has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 1.23 per game. Tanta SC takes 7.1 shots per game, while Olympic El Qanah takes 10.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Tanta SC leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.26 goals per game after halftime. Olympic El Qanah leads at halftime in 43% and scores 0.96 after halftime.

When the teams score

Tanta SC's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Olympic El Qanah, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Second Division games average 1.85 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 29% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Olympic El Qanah is the decisive favorite for this encounter, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 15 wins, 7 draws, and only 1 defeat. The visitors present phenomenal away form with a 75% win rate and just 0.08 goals conceded on average per away match, resulting in 92% clean sheets. Tanta SC sits in the relegation zone in 17th position, with only 9% of home matches won and a negative goal difference (-5) in home games. The form of the last five matches unequivocally favors the visitors (2.6 points per game vs 0.8 for the hosts), and the difference in offensive (1.42 vs 0.73 goals per game) and defensive quality is immense. Olympic El Qanah's advantage in xG statistics, shot conversion, and consistency in gaining points makes an away victory the most probable scenario.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

56Possession (%)44
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
8Shots8
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
5Shots on target3
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
1.26xG0.95
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
12Corners6
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
55Dangerous attacks32
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
16Fouls17
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0Cards0
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0.65Goals scored / game1.57
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
1Goals allowed / game0.43
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
45%Average possession44%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
3.04Shots on target / game4.22
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.13Shots per game10
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
3.04Shots on target4.22
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
9.1%Shot conversion15.7%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
45%Possession44%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
1.23xG for1.5
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
1.32xG against1.23
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

Shooting quality

Tanta SC: BalancedOlympic El Qanah: Counter-attacking
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
Accuracy (shots on target)43%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Olympic El Qanah is 225% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Tanta SC · 2.6 pts / game - Olympic El Qanah

Tanta SC
DDDLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
9% W57% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-13-8
0.83 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-6-4
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DWDDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%
Olympic El Qanah
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
65% W30% D4% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-7-1
2.26 pts / game · goal difference +26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
9-2-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Olympic El Qanah is 142% better for: goals scored per game.

0.65 goals / game - Tanta SC · 1.57 goals / game - Olympic El Qanah

Olympic El Qanah is 133% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - Tanta SC · 0.43 goals / game - Olympic El Qanah

Tanta SC scoring profile: more difficult

Tanta SC scores in 57% of games (13 of 23 games), while Olympic El Qanah keeps a clean sheet in 61% (14 of 23 games).

Olympic El Qanah scoring profile: very strong

Olympic El Qanah scores in 87% of games (20 of 23 games), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 games).

15Goals scored (season)36
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
23Goals conceded (season)10
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
1.65Average goals per game2
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
4Goals scored (last 5)8
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
6Goals conceded (last 5)0
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal87%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
4%2 goals48%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
4%3 goals17%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0%4 goals4%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal39%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
22%2 goals4%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
4%3 goals0%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0%4 goals0%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time9%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
4%Scored in both halves26%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
80%BTTS - last 50%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Olympic El Qanah is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / game - Tanta SC · 1.78 pts / game - Olympic El Qanah

Tanta SC - half-time state
17% leading65% draw17% trailing
Olympic El Qanah - half-time state
43% leading48% draw9% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per game (1st half)1.78
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.61
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.17
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0.74Average goals (1st half)0.78
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
65%Clean sheet before half-time83%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
65%No goal before half-time52%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

After half-time (2nd half)

0.87Points per game (2nd half)1.96
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0.26Goals scored (2nd half)0.96
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)0.26
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0.91Average goals (2nd half)1.22
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
52%Clean sheet after half-time78%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
74%No goal after half-time35%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

Tanta SC - second-half results

13% W48% D39% L
27
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding53%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 9%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Olympic El Qanah - second-half results

57% W26% D17% L
41
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.78
PPG before half-time
Lead holding151%

Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 65%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tanta SC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.00
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Olympic El Qanah - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.202.20
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.00.0
Average goals per game0.61.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Tanta SC
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
5
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
5
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Olympic El Qanah
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
3
0
16-30
7
3
31-45
5
3
46-60
5
0
61-75
12
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Tanta SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Olympic El Qanah

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.87
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.80
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
173%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
46%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Tanta SCLigaOlympic El Qanah
Average goals per game▼ 1.651.85▲ 2.00
Both teams scored▲ 52%40%▼ 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 17%29%• 30%
Clean sheets▼ 26%39%▲ 61%
Goal before half-time• 52%51%▲ 57%
Goal after half-time▼ 61%66%▲ 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.85
Average goals per game
40%
Both teams scored
29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
0.93
Home goals / game
0.91
Away goals / game
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
51%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Olympic El QanahGoalMostafa Hamada Abdel Kader

Head-to-head

Record from Tanta SC's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Olympic El Qanah. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Olympic El Qanah
1 : 1
Tanta SC

FAQ

What was the result of Tanta SC vs Olympic El Qanah?

The Second Division match finished Tanta SC 0:1 Olympic El Qanah. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tanta SC vs Olympic El Qanah?

Tanta SC score 0.65 goals per game on average and Olympic El Qanah 1.57. The Second Division average is 1.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Tanta SC's matches and 35% of Olympic El Qanah's.

What form are Tanta SC and Olympic El Qanah in?

Over the last 5 games Tanta SC have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Olympic El Qanah 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanta SC vs Olympic El Qanah?

The statistical background for Tanta SC vs Olympic El Qanah — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.