Tanta SC vs Telecom Egypt SC: match statistics
Tanta SC vs Telecom Egypt SC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Tanta SC played against Telecom Egypt SC in Second Division (Egypt). The game was played on April 16, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Tanta SC has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Telecom Egypt SC has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Tanta SC scores 0.66 goals per game and allows 0.93. Telecom Egypt SC scores 0.97 and allows 0.90. Games in this league average 1.89 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Tanta SC's games and 38% of Telecom Egypt SC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 17% and 41%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 31% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Tanta SC has the higher season xG average, 1.23 to 1.11 per game. Tanta SC takes 7.0 shots per game, while Telecom Egypt SC takes 6.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Tanta SC leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.24 goals per game after halftime. Telecom Egypt SC leads at halftime in 28% and scores 0.66 after halftime.
When the teams score
Tanta SC's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). For Telecom Egypt SC, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 1.89 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 31% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back a draw: Tanta sits 15th and struggles offensively — only 19 goals this season, averaging 0.64 goals per home game and a shot conversion rate of 7%, translating into just 14% home wins. Telecom are higher (6th), have scored more (28 this season) with better conversion (16%) and average 1.29 goals away, but they frequently share points (50% away draws). Both teams concede on average 1.07 goals per match, and xG is similar (Tanta at home 1.22 vs Telecom away 1.17), indicating minimal differences in chance creation quality. Tanta fails to score in 36% of home matches and has a lower clean sheet rate (21% vs Telecom’s 29%), so the hosts have limited capacity to tilt the result in their favor. Consequently I give the highest probability to a draw, with chances of 15% for a home win, 45% for a draw and 40% for a Telecom win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I favor No Goal (no BTTS) at 60% vs 40% for BTTS - Yes. Home side Tanta have a seasonal BTTS rate of just 20% and keep a clean sheet in 47% of matches, averaging 0.67 scored and 0.73 conceded per game, indicating frequent matches without their scoring. Visitors Telecom have a seasonal BTTS of 57%, average 1.29 goals per game and a shot conversion of 16%; in the last 5 matches they scored 8 and conceded 8 (avg 1.6/1.6), so they are the more likely scorers. xG shows similar chance creation (home xG 1.07 vs away xG 1.17), but the home side’s lower actual efficiency (0.67 goals vs xG 1.07) and the league’s low average of 1.89 goals support the scenario that only the visitors will find the net.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined xG of both teams indicates a moderate number of scoring opportunities: Tanta’s attacking xG is 1.07, Telecom 1.17, against xG conceded of 1.09 (Tanta) and 1.13 (Telecom), yielding a combined potential around 2.2 and estimated 0.94 goals for Tanta and 1.22 for Telecom (sum 2.16). Telecom averages 8.27 shots and 3.36 on target per match versus 7.5 and 2.86 for Tanta, and shot conversion is 16% for Telecom versus 9% for Tanta, which increases the away side’s likelihood of scoring. Seasonal figures confirm the gap: Tanta scores 0.67 goals on average and only 27% of their matches see more than 1.5 goals, while Telecom averages 1.29 goals and 57% of their matches are over 1.5; in the last 5 matches Telecom averaged 1.6 goals, Tanta 0.8. A Poisson model for the expected total of 2.16 gives roughly a 64% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), about 37% for Over 2.5 and about 17% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. On that basis I recommend backing the Over line at 1.5 as the best value, given the combined xG ~2.2 and Telecom’s higher conversion rate.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario appears to be a draw at half-time with the away team winning by full-time (X/2). Both teams frequently share the lead at the break: the home side had HT draws in 47% of matches, the visitors in 43%, with low average first-half goals: 0.27 for Tant and 0.36 for Telecom. Over the full match Telecom also scores more — the season-long average goals for the away team is 1.29 versus 0.67 for the home side, and in second halves Telecom averages 1.64 goals compared to Tant’s 0.87. In the last five fixtures the visitors have recorded more than 0.5 second-half goals in 100% of matches and more than 1.5 second-half goals in 80% of cases; additionally they average 3.36 shots on target with a 16% conversion rate versus the home team’s 2.86 and 9%, which increases the likelihood of a turnaround after the break in Telecom’s favor.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Tanta SC | Telecom Egypt SC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Telecom Egypt SC is 47% better for: goals scored per game.
0.66 goals / game - Tanta SC · 0.97 goals / game - Telecom Egypt SC
Tanta SC scores in 55% of games (16 of 29 meczów), while Telecom Egypt SC keeps a clean sheet in 38% (11 of 29 meczów).
Telecom Egypt SC scores in 59% of games (17 of 29 meczów), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tanta SC
Over / Under - Telecom Egypt SC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tanta SC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 14%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Telecom Egypt SC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Tanta SC
Telecom Egypt SC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Tanta SC | Liga | Telecom Egypt SC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.59 | 1.89 | • 1.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 48% | 40% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 17% | 31% | ▲ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 28% | 39% | • 38% |
| Goal before half-time | • 52% | 51% | ▲ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 62% | 67% | ▼ 59% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Tanta SC's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Telecom Egypt SC. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Tanta SC vs Telecom Egypt SC?
The Second Division match finished Tanta SC 1:1 Telecom Egypt SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tanta SC vs Telecom Egypt SC?
Tanta SC score 0.66 goals per game on average and Telecom Egypt SC 0.97. The Second Division average is 1.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Tanta SC's matches and 38% of Telecom Egypt SC's.
What form are Tanta SC and Telecom Egypt SC in?
Over the last 5 games Tanta SC have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Telecom Egypt SC 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanta SC vs Telecom Egypt SC?
The statistical background for Tanta SC vs Telecom Egypt SC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.