Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 17 July 2026

Tanzania Prisons vs Azam: match statistics

Tanzania Prisons crest
Tanzania Prisons
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Azam crest
Azam
125%(6.66)
X30%(4.97)
245%(1.32)

Azam presents significantly better form and statistics in away matches. The visiting team remains unbeaten away this season (0 losses), with a record of 5 victories and 5 draws, along with an impressive goal difference of +12 throughout the season. Tanzania Prisons occupies a weak 14th position in the table, with only 29% of matches won at home and a worrying indicator of 57% of matches without scoring a goal at their own stadium. Azam dominates possession (54% vs 47%) and has better scoring statistics (1.5 goals per away match vs 0.71 for the hosts). The form of the last 5 matches also favors the visitors (2.0 points per match vs 0.8 for the hosts). Considering all these factors, an Azam victory is the most probable result, although the visitors' solid percentage of draws away (75%) suggests that a draw is also a realistic option.

Tanzania Prisons vs Azam: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tanzania Prisons play Azam in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 5 March 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Tanzania Prisons: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Azam: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tanzania Prisons scores 0.72 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Azam scores 1.52 and concedes 0.41. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tanzania Prisons 31%, Azam 17%. Over 2.5: Tanzania Prisons 38%, Azam 34%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Azam has higher xG: 1.56 vs 0.95. Tanzania Prisons: 3.6 shots per match, Azam: 10.2.

Match halves

Tanzania Prisons: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.38. Azam: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Tanzania Prisons: 0-15 (6 goals). Azam: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Azam presents significantly better form and statistics in away matches. The visiting team remains unbeaten away this season (0 losses), with a record of 5 victories and 5 draws, along with an impressive goal difference of +12 throughout the season. Tanzania Prisons occupies a weak 14th position in the table, with only 29% of matches won at home and a worrying indicator of 57% of matches without scoring a goal at their own stadium. Azam dominates possession (54% vs 47%) and has better scoring statistics (1.5 goals per away match vs 0.71 for the hosts). The form of the last 5 matches also favors the visitors (2.0 points per match vs 0.8 for the hosts). Considering all these factors, an Azam victory is the most probable result, although the visitors' solid percentage of draws away (75%) suggests that a draw is also a realistic option.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
2Shots3
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
1Shots on target0
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0.67xG0.86
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0Corners7
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
65Dangerous attacks93
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
-1Fouls-1
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
-1Cards-1
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0.72Goals scored / match1.52
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
1.31Goals conceded / match0.41
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
35%Average possession52%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
1.13Shots on target / match3.38
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.63Shots per match10.17
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
1.13Shots on target3.38
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
19.8%Shot conversion14.9%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
35%Possession52%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0.95xG for1.56
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
1.29xG against1.02
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

Shooting quality

Tanzania Prisons: Counter-attackingAzam: Efficient finishing
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
Accuracy (shots on target)31%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.260.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.640.45

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Azam is 71% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons · 2.4 pts / match - Azam

Tanzania Prisons
LWWLD
Season result split
28% W19% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-17
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-6
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.87Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Azam
WWLWW
Season result split
59% W34% R7% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-10-2
2.10 pts / match · goal difference +32
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-6-2
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Azam is 111% better for: goals scored per match.

0.72 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons · 1.52 goals / match - Azam

Azam is 220% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.31 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons · 0.41 goals / match - Azam

Tanzania Prisons scoring profile: more difficult

Tanzania Prisons scores in 47% of matches (15 of 32 matches), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 79% (23 of 29 matches).

Azam scoring profile: strong

Azam scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Tanzania Prisons keeps a clean sheet in 31% (10 of 32 matches).

23Goals scored (season)44
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
42Goals conceded (season)12
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
2.03Average goals in match1.93
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
4Goals scored (last 5)8
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
6Goals conceded (last 5)3
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

How often they score at least...

47%1 goal72%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
16%2 goals59%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
9%3 goals21%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0%4 goals0%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal21%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
41%2 goals10%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
16%3 goals7%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
6%4 goals3%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

31%
Tanzania Prisons - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 32 matches
35%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time3%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
6%Scored in both halves24%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS10%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS24%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
40%BTTS - last 50%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time59%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Azam is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.03 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons · 1.86 pts / match - Azam

Tanzania Prisons - half-time state
16% leading56% draw28% trailing
Azam - half-time state
48% leading41% draw10% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.03Points per match (1st half)1.86
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0.34Goals scored (1st half)0.83
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.17
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0.97Average goals (1st half)1
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
56%Clean sheet before half-time90%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
69%No goal before half-time48%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

After half-time (2nd half)

0.97Points per match (2nd half)1.76
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.24
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0.97Average goals (2nd half)0.93
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
56%Clean sheet after half-time79%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
78%No goal after half-time55%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

Tanzania Prisons - second-half results

16% W50% R34% P
33
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding175%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Azam - second-half results

45% W41% R14% P
54
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
51
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tanzania Prisons - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.80
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.41.2
1 goal20%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Azam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+4+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tanzania Prisons
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
1
5
16-30
4
10
31-45
2
5
46-60
5
7
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Azam
ScoredConceded
7
0
0-15
6
1
16-30
11
4
31-45
8
2
46-60
6
3
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
24%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tanzania Prisons

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
55%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
151%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Azam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-20.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.61
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
175%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
32%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Tanzania PrisonsLigaAzam
Average goals in match 2.032.17 1.93
Both teams scored 31%35% 17%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%39% 34%
Clean sheets 31%39% 79%
Goal before half-time 56%60% 59%
Goal after half-time 56%63% 59%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tanzania Prisons 0 - 0 - 1 Azam. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Tanzania Prisons vs Azam?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Tanzania Prisons 0:0 Azam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tanzania Prisons vs Azam?

Tanzania Prisons score 0.72 goals per game on average and Azam 1.52. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 31% of Tanzania Prisons's matches and 17% of Azam's.

What form are Tanzania Prisons and Azam in?

Over the last 5 games Tanzania Prisons have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Azam 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanzania Prisons vs Azam?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.