Italy - Serie C Group CData current as of September 12, 2026

Team Altamura vs Virtus Casarano: match statistics

Team Altamura vs Virtus Casarano: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Team Altamura played against Virtus Casarano in Serie C Group C (Italy). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 0:4.

Recent form

Team Altamura has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Virtus Casarano has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Team Altamura scores 0.86 goals per game and allows 1.22. Virtus Casarano scores 1.41 and allows 1.54. Games in this league average 2.46 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 49% of Team Altamura's games and 59% of Virtus Casarano's. The Over 2.5 rates are 35% and 62%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Virtus Casarano has the higher season xG average, 1.21 to 0.94 per game. Team Altamura takes 7.5 shots per game, while Virtus Casarano takes 9.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Team Altamura leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.43 goals per game after halftime. Virtus Casarano leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.86 after halftime.

When the teams score

Team Altamura's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For Virtus Casarano, it is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Serie C Group C games average 2.46 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I expect a draw. Altamura’s home defense is clearly stronger than Virtus’s away defense: they concede 1.28 goals at home on average and keep 22% clean sheets, whereas the visitors concede 2.17 goals away and have only 6% clean sheets. Virtus Casarano, however, possesses a superior offensive record this season (52 goals scored vs 32 for Altamura) and averages more shots on target per away match (3.33 vs 2.5) with a higher conversion rate (16% vs 14%). In their last 5 matches the visitors scored 8 goals and won 3 of 5 (3-1-1), while the hosts scored only 4 goals and won 1 of 5 (1-2-2), giving Virtus the form edge. Chance quality is similar — xG for Virtus 1.11 vs 1.02 for Altamura, but xG against 1.77 (visitors) vs 1.36 (hosts) indicates visitors’ matches tend to be more open (an average of 3.5 goals in their away games vs 2.44 at Altamura’s home). Considering the hosts’ better defense and the visitors’ current form, I expect an even contest finishing in a draw, with a slightly higher probability of a home win than an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal is the high BTTS rate for the away team: 72% seasonally and 80% in the last 5 matches, while the home team has 47% seasonally and 60% in the last 5, which together favors Goal/Goal. The hosts score 1.47 and concede 0.95 per match, whereas the visitors score 1.33 and concede as much as 2.17 this season, so the away defense is vulnerable and increases the likelihood that the hosts will score. xG values confirm this trend: hosts have xG 1.30 versus away xG against 1.77, and in the last 5 matches the away team has xG 1.32 and averages 1.6 goals scored. Additionally, the visitors have only 6% clean sheets compared to 42% for the hosts, and the league records an average of 2.46 goals and 51% BTTS, indicating this match fits the league tendency for both teams to score. Based on this, I recommend BTTS = Yes with probability 75% vs 25%, because the away team’s 72% seasonal BTTS and 80% in the last 5 is the strongest signal combined with the away defense weakness and the hosts’ middling profile.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Expected goals estimate based on xG: Altamura has xG_for 1.30, while Casarano’s defense concedes xG 1.77, yielding 1.54 expected goals for the home side; Casarano has xG_for 1.11 and Altamura’s defense concedes 1.32, giving 1.21 for the visitors and a combined 2.75 expected goals. Seasonal stats show 74% of Altamura’s matches and 94% of Casarano’s matches finished with over 1.5 goals (average 84%), and the high percentage of both teams scoring—72% for Casarano versus 47% for Altamura—along with shot and shots-on-target numbers (10.42 vs 8.39 and 4.05 vs 3.33) reinforce the signal for an open game; therefore I assign Over 1.5 a probability of 86%. For the 2.5 line, seasonal overs are 47% and 78% (average 62.5%), and in the last 5 matches Casarano has 60% Over 2.5, so given the 2.75 expected goals I rate Over 2.5 at 65%. The 3.5 line has weaker support: seasonal figures 21% and 33% (average 27%), and although Casarano concedes 2.17 goals per match on average, shot conversion 14%/16% and the raw shot counts do not indicate a high probability of >3.5, so I assess Over 3.5 at 31%. In summary, the best pick is Over 1.5 (line 1.5, over) due to an average 84% of season matches with >1.5 goals, the 2.75 expected goals, and the high rate of both teams scoring for the away side.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is Team Altamura leading at half-time and winning by full-time (1/1): Altamura led at the break in 8 of 19 home matches (42%) and has a higher home win rate of 53% versus Virtus Casarano’s 28%. At half-time Altamura averages 0.58 goals scored and 0.32 conceded, while Casarano averages 0.50 scored and 0.83 conceded, giving the home side an approximate 0.26-goal advantage in the first half. In the second half the hosts have a positive balance (second-half goal difference +5 and average points in second halves 1.47), whereas the visitors have a negative balance (-9 and 1.06), so Altamura more often maintains or extends a lead after the break. Hence the probability distribution: highest at 33% for 1/1, followed by X/1 at 19% and X/X at 13% for a half-time draw; comeback scenarios for Casarano are unlikely (for example 1/2 only 3%), which aligns with their 28% away win rate and an average of 2.17 goals conceded per match.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

55Possession (%)45
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
13Shots10
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
2Shots on target7
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
1.33xG1.36
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
1Corners2
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
50Dangerous attacks32
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
11Fouls10
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
1Cards1
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
0.86Goals scored / game1.41
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
1.22Goals allowed / game1.54
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
46%Average possession51%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
2.16Shots on target / game3.7
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.46Shots per game9.43
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
2.16Shots on target3.7
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
11.6%Shot conversion14.9%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
46%Possession51%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
0.94xG for1.21
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
1.44xG against1.54
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano

Shooting quality

Team Altamura: BalancedVirtus Casarano: Efficient finishing
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
Accuracy (shots on target)29%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Virtus Casarano is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Team Altamura · 2 pts / game - Virtus Casarano

Team Altamura
LWLDD
Season result split
30% W32% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-12-14
1.22 pts / game · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-6-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.71Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Virtus Casarano
DWWWL
Season result split
41% W22% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-8-14
1.43 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-10
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Virtus Casarano is 64% better for: goals scored per game.

0.86 goals / game - Team Altamura · 1.41 goals / game - Virtus Casarano

Team Altamura is 26% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.22 goals / game - Team Altamura · 1.54 goals / game - Virtus Casarano

Team Altamura scoring profile: very strong

Team Altamura scores in 70% of games (26 of 37 meczów), while Virtus Casarano keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 37 meczów).

Virtus Casarano scoring profile: very strong

Virtus Casarano scores in 81% of games (30 of 37 meczów), while Team Altamura keeps a clean sheet in 30% (11 of 37 meczów).

32Goals scored (season)52
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
45Goals conceded (season)57
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
2.08Average goals per game2.95
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
4Goals scored (last 5)8
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal81%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
14%2 goals43%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
3%3 goals16%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
0%4 goals0%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal76%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
35%2 goals43%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
11%3 goals22%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
5%4 goals8%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time19%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
0%BTTS in both halves8%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
5%Scored in both halves22%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS49%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
60%BTTS - last 580%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time59%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time30%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Virtus Casarano is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.16 pts / game - Team Altamura · 1.35 pts / game - Virtus Casarano

Team Altamura - half-time state
27% leading35% draw38% trailing
Virtus Casarano - half-time state
30% leading46% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.16Points per game (1st half)1.35
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.54
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
1.08Average goals (1st half)1.11
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
57%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
65%No goal before half-time54%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano

After half-time (2nd half)

1.22Points per game (2nd half)1.27
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.97
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
1Average goals (2nd half)1.84
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
54%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano
59%No goal after half-time43%
Team AltamuraVirtus Casarano

Team Altamura - second-half results

27% W41% D32% L
43
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Virtus Casarano - second-half results

32% W30% D38% L
50
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding137%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Team Altamura - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.80
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.20.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Virtus Casarano - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.60
Goals scored / game0.41.2
Goals allowed / game0.01.0
Average goals per game0.42.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Team Altamura
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
3
8
16-30
8
12
31-45
7
6
46-60
3
5
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Virtus Casarano
ScoredConceded
8
7
0-15
4
10
16-30
8
4
31-45
7
10
46-60
11
9
61-75
14
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.51
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-60%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Team Altamura

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Virtus Casarano

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).

Teams vs league

Team AltamuraLigaVirtus Casarano
Average goals per game 2.082.46 2.95
Both teams scored 49%51% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%46% 62%
Clean sheets 30%29% 24%
Goal before half-time 70%66% 68%
Goal after half-time 73%79% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.46
Average goals per game
51%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / game
1.00
Away goals / game
+46%
Home attack advantage
+32%
Home defensive advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Virtus CasaranoGoalFrancesco Grandolfo
  2. Virtus CasaranoGoalLeandro Versienti
  3. Virtus CasaranoYellow cardVito Leonetti
  4. Team AltamuraSubstitutionOn: Antonino ViolaOff: Fabrizio Alastra
  5. Virtus CasaranoGoalKarlo Lulić
  6. Team AltamuraSubstitutionOn: Marco CrimiOff: Nicholas Fantoni
  7. Team AltamuraYellow cardMatteo Zazza
  8. Virtus CasaranoGoalCosimo Chiricò
  9. Team AltamuraSubstitutionOn: Roberto DimolaOff: Marco Rosafio
  10. Virtus CasaranoSubstitutionOn: Giulio PatrignaniOff: Cosimo Chiricò

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Enrico GemelliMatches officiated: 10
3.2Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 210%Home wins60%Draws30%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Team Altamura's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Virtus Casarano. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Team Altamura vs Virtus Casarano?

The Serie C Group C match finished Team Altamura 0:4 Virtus Casarano. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Team Altamura vs Virtus Casarano?

Team Altamura score 0.86 goals per game on average and Virtus Casarano 1.41. The Serie C Group C average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 49% of Team Altamura's matches and 59% of Virtus Casarano's.

What form are Team Altamura and Virtus Casarano in?

Over the last 5 games Team Altamura have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Virtus Casarano 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Team Altamura vs Virtus Casarano?

The statistical background for Team Altamura vs Virtus Casarano — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.