Telstar vs Sparta Rotterdam: match statistics
Telstar vs Sparta Rotterdam: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Telstar played against Sparta Rotterdam in Eredivisie (Netherlands). The game was played on April 22, 2026. Final score: 4:1.
Recent form
Telstar has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Sparta Rotterdam has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Telstar scores 1.30 goals per game and allows 1.73. Sparta Rotterdam scores 1.17 and allows 1.63. Games in this league average 3.17 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Telstar's games and 40% of Sparta Rotterdam's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 47%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Telstar has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.45 per game. Telstar takes 13.2 shots per game, while Sparta Rotterdam takes 12.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Telstar leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.77 goals per game after halftime. Sparta Rotterdam leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.73 after halftime.
When the teams score
Telstar's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Sparta Rotterdam, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Eredivisie games average 3.17 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back a home win (1) because Telstar generates clearly superior offensive chances: average home xG 1.57 versus Sparta’s away xG 1.44, and average on-target shots 5.4 vs 4.2. Telstar has scored 8 goals in the last 5 matches and averages 1.6 goals per home game, while Sparta has only 3 goals in the last 5 and 1.2 goals per away game. Sparta’s advantages are match-by-match efficiency and away defense — 40% clean sheets on the road versus 7% for Telstar, and 40% away wins compared to Telstar’s 20% home wins. Both teams concede 1.8 goals per match on average, but Telstar has conceded 11 goals in the last 5 games versus Sparta’s 7, indicating defensive instability for the hosts. On this basis I give a moderate edge to Telstar: 50% for a home win, 25% for a draw and 25% for a Sparta win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have season BTTS at 40% (Telstar 40%, Sparta 40%), well below the league average of 63%. Telstar's last 5 matches show BTTS 60% and they concede on average 2.2 goals with xG against 2.11, indicating defensive vulnerability that increases the opponent’s scoring probability. Sparta scores 1.2 goals seasonally with xG 1.44 per match, but their last 5 games show a drop to 0.6 goals per game and only 20% BTTS, which reduces their likelihood to find the net. However, both sides have high season xG against (1.83 for Telstar, 1.79 for Sparta) and average 12.8 and 12.6 shots per game respectively, suggesting chance creation at both ends. Considering Telstar’s recent defensive issues (2.2 conceded in last 5) and Sparta’s seasonal scoring potential (xG 1.44, 1.2 goals), I assign a higher probability to BTTS: Yes 60%, No 40%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match total xG is 2.91 (Telstar 1.47 + Sparta 1.44), indicating significant attacking activity and sitting close to the 2.5 goals threshold. Telstar have had 80% of home games with over 1.5 goals, Sparta 67% away, and both teams show high >0.5 goal rates (100% and 93%), which strongly supports at least two goals in the game. Signals for the 2.5 line are mixed: Sparta have 60% of matches over 2.5 goals, Telstar 33%, however in their last 5 fixtures Telstar recorded 80% of games over 2.5 and the xG sum in those five matches is 3.21 (1.76 + 1.45), which increases the probability of more than 2 goals. Considering the combined xG of 2.91, the league average goals of 3.17 and the high number of goals conceded (Telstar 52, Sparta 49), I recommend backing Over 1.5 goals as the strongest signal. Over 3.5 is less likely (~28%) given seasonal rates of 20–40% for such outcomes.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Telstar has strong first-half statistics: they led at the break in 40% of matches and score an average of 0.6 goals by half-time versus Sparta’s 0.27, so the hosts are more often in the lead after 45 minutes. However, Sparta hold a clear advantage in second halves: they score an average of 0.93 goals after the break versus Telstar’s 0.53 and earn an average of 1.4 points in second halves compared to the hosts’ mere 0.87 points, which increases their chance of a comeback. Additionally, the visitors are frequently behind at the break (47% of matches) but score late — 8 goals in minutes 76–90 versus the hosts’ 4 — which supports a turnaround after half-time. The teams’ xG is similar (1.47 versus 1.44), so the difference is more the dynamics of the second half than higher quality; therefore the strongest signal is 1/2 — Telstar leading at Half-Time with Sparta winning Full-Time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Telstar | Sparta Rotterdam | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Telstar is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Telstar · 1 pts / game - Sparta Rotterdam
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Telstar is 11% better for: goals scored per game.
1.3 goals / game - Telstar · 1.17 goals / game - Sparta Rotterdam
Sparta Rotterdam is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.73 goals / game - Telstar · 1.63 goals / game - Sparta Rotterdam
Telstar scores in 73% of games (22 of 30 meczów), while Sparta Rotterdam keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 meczów).
Sparta Rotterdam scores in 73% of games (22 of 30 meczów), while Telstar keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Telstar
Over / Under - Sparta Rotterdam
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sparta Rotterdam is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / game - Telstar · 1.33 pts / game - Sparta Rotterdam
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Telstar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 20%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Sparta Rotterdam - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Telstar
Sparta Rotterdam
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eredivisie).
Teams vs league
| Telstar | Liga | Sparta Rotterdam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.03 | 3.17 | ▼ 2.80 |
| Both teams scored | • 63% | 63% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 57% | 62% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 20% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 77% | 81% | ▼ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 84% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Telstar's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Sparta Rotterdam. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Telstar vs Sparta Rotterdam?
The Eredivisie match finished Telstar 4:1 Sparta Rotterdam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Telstar vs Sparta Rotterdam?
Telstar score 1.30 goals per game on average and Sparta Rotterdam 1.17. The Eredivisie average is 3.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Telstar's matches and 40% of Sparta Rotterdam's.
What form are Telstar and Sparta Rotterdam in?
Over the last 5 games Telstar have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Sparta Rotterdam 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Telstar vs Sparta Rotterdam?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


