Italy - Serie C Group BData current as of 22 July 2026

Ternana vs Ravenna: match statistics

Ternana crest
Ternana
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Ravenna crest
Ravenna
135%(2.40)
X30%(2.87)
235%(2.80)

The match promises to be extremely even, which argues for a draw. Ternana presents solid form at home with 55% wins in domestic matches and a positive goal difference (+3), though their recent form is unstable (1.4 PPG). Ravenna possesses a better overall record (15 wins) and higher efficiency (13% shot conversion vs 9% for the hosts), but they only win in 50% of cases on the road and have shown fluctuating form in recent away games. A key factor is the matched level of possession (53% for both teams) and similar averages for goals scored and conceded. xG statistics indicate a slight offensive advantage for Ternana (1.94 vs 1.35), but Ravenna has a better defense in absolute numbers. Taking all factors into account, I expect a tight match with a slight edge for the hosts, yet a draw is the most probable scenario.

Ternana vs Ravenna: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ternana play Ravenna in Serie C Group B (Italy). The match date is 12 February 2026 at 20:30. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Ternana: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Ravenna: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ternana scores 1.22 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Ravenna scores 1.39 and concedes 0.83. League average: 2.26 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ternana 56%, Ravenna 42%. Over 2.5: Ternana 42%, Ravenna 39%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Ternana has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.42. Ternana: 12.1 shots per match, Ravenna: 11.5.

Match halves

Ternana: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.69. Ravenna: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.81.

Goals by minute

Ternana: 61-75 (10 goals). Ravenna: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group B: 2.26 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

The match promises to be extremely even, which argues for a draw. Ternana presents solid form at home with 55% wins in domestic matches and a positive goal difference (+3), though their recent form is unstable (1.4 PPG). Ravenna possesses a better overall record (15 wins) and higher efficiency (13% shot conversion vs 9% for the hosts), but they only win in 50% of cases on the road and have shown fluctuating form in recent away games. A key factor is the matched level of possession (53% for both teams) and similar averages for goals scored and conceded. xG statistics indicate a slight offensive advantage for Ternana (1.94 vs 1.35), but Ravenna has a better defense in absolute numbers. Taking all factors into account, I expect a tight match with a slight edge for the hosts, yet a draw is the most probable scenario.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
TernanaRavenna
12Shots5
TernanaRavenna
3Shots on target0
TernanaRavenna
1.64xG0.77
TernanaRavenna
8Corners3
TernanaRavenna
93Dangerous attacks62
TernanaRavenna
9Fouls17
TernanaRavenna
2Cards0
TernanaRavenna

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.22Goals scored / match1.39
TernanaRavenna
1.11Goals conceded / match0.83
TernanaRavenna
52%Average possession52%
TernanaRavenna
3.97Shots on target / match3.83
TernanaRavenna

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.14Shots per match11.47
TernanaRavenna
3.97Shots on target3.83
TernanaRavenna
10.1%Shot conversion12.1%
TernanaRavenna
52%Possession52%
TernanaRavenna
1.62xG for1.42
TernanaRavenna
1.22xG against1.39
TernanaRavenna

Shooting quality

Ternana: BalancedRavenna: Balanced
TernanaRavenna
Accuracy (shots on target)33%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ravenna is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Ternana · 3 pts / match - Ravenna

Ternana
DLDWL
Season result split
39% W31% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-11-11
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-4-6
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Ravenna
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
61% W19% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
22-7-7
2.03 pts / match · goal difference +20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-4-6
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ravenna is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.22 goals / match - Ternana · 1.39 goals / match - Ravenna

Ravenna is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.11 goals / match - Ternana · 0.83 goals / match - Ravenna

Ternana scoring profile: strong

Ternana scores in 75% of matches (27 of 36 matches), while Ravenna keeps a clean sheet in 44% (16 of 36 matches).

Ravenna scoring profile: very strong

Ravenna scores in 81% of matches (29 of 36 matches), while Ternana keeps a clean sheet in 25% (9 of 36 matches).

44Goals scored (season)50
TernanaRavenna
40Goals conceded (season)30
TernanaRavenna
2.33Average goals in match2.22
TernanaRavenna
7Goals scored (last 5)7
TernanaRavenna
9Goals conceded (last 5)0
TernanaRavenna

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal81%
TernanaRavenna
42%2 goals39%
TernanaRavenna
6%3 goals17%
TernanaRavenna
0%4 goals3%
TernanaRavenna

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal56%
TernanaRavenna
25%2 goals25%
TernanaRavenna
8%3 goals3%
TernanaRavenna
3%4 goals0%
TernanaRavenna

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time11%
TernanaRavenna
6%BTTS in both halves0%
TernanaRavenna
36%Scored in both halves22%
TernanaRavenna

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
TernanaRavenna
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
TernanaRavenna
100%BTTS - last 50%
TernanaRavenna

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
TernanaRavenna
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
TernanaRavenna
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
TernanaRavenna

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
TernanaRavenna
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
TernanaRavenna
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
TernanaRavenna

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ravenna is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.28 pts / match - Ternana · 1.61 pts / match - Ravenna

Ternana - half-time state
25% leading53% draw22% trailing
Ravenna - half-time state
39% leading44% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.28Points per match (1st half)1.61
TernanaRavenna
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.58
TernanaRavenna
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.28
TernanaRavenna
1Average goals (1st half)0.86
TernanaRavenna
61%Clean sheet before half-time75%
TernanaRavenna
53%No goal before half-time53%
TernanaRavenna

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.61
TernanaRavenna
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.81
TernanaRavenna
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
TernanaRavenna
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.36
TernanaRavenna
53%Clean sheet after half-time64%
TernanaRavenna
36%No goal after half-time44%
TernanaRavenna

Ternana - second-half results

39% W33% R28% P
46
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ravenna - second-half results

42% W36% R22% P
58
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
58
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ternana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Ravenna - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.60
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.41.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+2+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ternana
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
6
3
16-30
8
8
31-45
7
8
46-60
10
6
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Ravenna
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
10
5
31-45
5
7
46-60
10
2
61-75
14
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.27
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-56%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ternana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Ravenna

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.97
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).

Teams vs league

TernanaLigaRavenna
Average goals in match 2.332.26 2.22
Both teams scored 56%49% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%39% 39%
Clean sheets 25%31% 44%
Goal before half-time 64%63% 61%
Goal after half-time 83%72% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.26
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.18
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+9%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Ternana 0 - 0 - 1 Ravenna. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Ravenna
1 : 0
Ternana

FAQ

What was the result of Ternana vs Ravenna?

The Serie C Group B match finished Ternana 2:0 Ravenna. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ternana vs Ravenna?

Ternana score 1.22 goals per game on average and Ravenna 1.39. The Serie C Group B average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Ternana's matches and 42% of Ravenna's.

What form are Ternana and Ravenna in?

Over the last 5 games Ternana have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Ravenna 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ternana vs Ravenna?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.