Ternana vs Ravenna: match statistics
The match promises to be extremely even, which argues for a draw. Ternana presents solid form at home with 55% wins in domestic matches and a positive goal difference (+3), though their recent form is unstable (1.4 PPG). Ravenna possesses a better overall record (15 wins) and higher efficiency (13% shot conversion vs 9% for the hosts), but they only win in 50% of cases on the road and have shown fluctuating form in recent away games. A key factor is the matched level of possession (53% for both teams) and similar averages for goals scored and conceded. xG statistics indicate a slight offensive advantage for Ternana (1.94 vs 1.35), but Ravenna has a better defense in absolute numbers. Taking all factors into account, I expect a tight match with a slight edge for the hosts, yet a draw is the most probable scenario.
Ternana vs Ravenna: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ternana played against Ravenna in Serie C Group B (Italy). The game was played on February 12, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Ternana has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Ravenna has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Ternana scores 1.09 goals per game and allows 0.96. Ravenna scores 1.54 and allows 0.96. Games in this league average 2.26 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Ternana's games and 54% of Ravenna's. The Over 2.5 rates are 30% and 54%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 37% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Ternana has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.53 per game. Ternana takes 11.4 shots per game, while Ravenna takes 12.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Ternana leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.65 goals per game after halftime. Ravenna leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.96 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ternana's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For Ravenna, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group B games average 2.26 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 37% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The match promises to be extremely even, which argues for a draw. Ternana presents solid form at home with 55% wins in domestic matches and a positive goal difference (+3), though their recent form is unstable (1.4 PPG). Ravenna possesses a better overall record (15 wins) and higher efficiency (13% shot conversion vs 9% for the hosts), but they only win in 50% of cases on the road and have shown fluctuating form in recent away games. A key factor is the matched level of possession (53% for both teams) and similar averages for goals scored and conceded. xG statistics indicate a slight offensive advantage for Ternana (1.94 vs 1.35), but Ravenna has a better defense in absolute numbers. Taking all factors into account, I expect a tight match with a slight edge for the hosts, yet a draw is the most probable scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ternana | Ravenna | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Ravenna is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Ternana · 1.6 pts / game - Ravenna
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ravenna is 41% better for: goals scored per game.
1.09 goals / game - Ternana · 1.54 goals / game - Ravenna
Ternana scores in 70% of games (16 of 23 meczów), while Ravenna keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 meczów).
Ravenna scores in 83% of games (20 of 24 meczów), while Ternana keeps a clean sheet in 30% (7 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ternana
Over / Under - Ravenna
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ravenna is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.22 pts / game - Ternana · 1.42 pts / game - Ravenna
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ternana - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Ravenna - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ternana
Ravenna
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).
Teams vs league
| Ternana | Liga | Ravenna | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.04 | 2.26 | ▲ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | • 48% | 48% | ▲ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 30% | 37% | ▲ 54% |
| Clean sheets | • 30% | 31% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 62% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 71% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Ternana's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Ravenna. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Ternana vs Ravenna?
The Serie C Group B match finished Ternana 2:0 Ravenna. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ternana vs Ravenna?
Ternana score 1.09 goals per game on average and Ravenna 1.54. The Serie C Group B average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Ternana's matches and 54% of Ravenna's.
What form are Ternana and Ravenna in?
Over the last 5 games Ternana have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Ravenna 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ternana vs Ravenna?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.