Egypt - Second DivisionMit Okba StadiumData current as of October 05, 2026

Tersana vs Kahraba Ismailia: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Tersana vs Kahraba Ismailia: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Tersana plays Kahraba Ismailia in Second Division (Egypt). The game is scheduled for October 8, 2026. Venue: Mit Okba Stadium.

Recent form

Tersana has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Kahraba Ismailia has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Tersana scores 0.86 goals per game and allows 0.71. Kahraba Ismailia scores 1.86 and allows 0.57. Games in this league average 2.21 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 43% of Tersana's games and 29% of Kahraba Ismailia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 14% and 43%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Kahraba Ismailia has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.10 per game. Tersana takes 12.1 shots per game, while Kahraba Ismailia takes 10.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Tersana leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 0.43 goals per game after halftime. Kahraba Ismailia leads at halftime in 57% and scores 0.86 after halftime.

When the teams score

Tersana's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For Kahraba Ismailia, it is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Second Division games average 2.21 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

TersanaKahraba Ismailia
0.86Goals scored / game1.86
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
0.71Goals allowed / game0.57
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
54%Average possession48%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
3.14Shots on target / game4.43
TersanaKahraba Ismailia

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.14Shots per game10.14
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
3.14Shots on target4.43
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
7.1%Shot conversion18.3%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
54%Possession48%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
1.1xG for1.59
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
0.92xG against1.13
TersanaKahraba Ismailia

Shooting quality

Tersana: BalancedKahraba Ismailia: Efficient finishing
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
Accuracy (shots on target)26%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.090.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Kahraba Ismailia is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Tersana · 2.4 pts / game - Kahraba Ismailia

Tersana
LDWDW
Season result split
43% W43% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-1
1.71 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-3-0
Last 5 at home
0-3-0
DDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.76Opponent xG: 0.76BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Kahraba Ismailia
LWWWW
Season result split
71% W14% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-1
2.29 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
DLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.84Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kahraba Ismailia is 116% better for: goals scored per game.

0.86 goals / game - Tersana · 1.86 goals / game - Kahraba Ismailia

Kahraba Ismailia is 25% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.71 goals / game - Tersana · 0.57 goals / game - Kahraba Ismailia

Tersana scoring profile: mixed

Tersana scores in 71% of games (5 of 7 games), while Kahraba Ismailia keeps a clean sheet in 57% (4 of 7 games).

Kahraba Ismailia scoring profile: strong

Kahraba Ismailia scores in 86% of games (6 of 7 games), while Tersana keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 games).

6Goals scored (season)13
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
5Goals conceded (season)4
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
1.57Average goals per game2.43
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
5Goals scored (last 5)9
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
TersanaKahraba Ismailia

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal86%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
14%2 goals57%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
0%3 goals43%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
0%4 goals0%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal43%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
14%2 goals14%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
0%3 goals0%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
0%4 goals0%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

46%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time14%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
0%BTTS in both halves0%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
14%Scored in both halves43%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS14%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
60%BTTS - last 520%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kahraba Ismailia is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.71 pts / game - Tersana · 2.14 pts / game - Kahraba Ismailia

Tersana - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing
Kahraba Ismailia - half-time state
57% leading43% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.71Points per game (1st half)2.14
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
0.43Goals scored (1st half)1
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
0.14Goals conceded (1st half)0.14
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
0.57Average goals (1st half)1.14
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
86%Clean sheet before half-time86%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
57%No goal before half-time29%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.71
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.43
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
1Average goals (2nd half)1.29
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
43%Clean sheet after half-time71%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia
57%No goal after half-time43%
TersanaKahraba Ismailia

Tersana - second-half results

14% W57% D29% L
12
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kahraba Ismailia - second-half results

43% W43% D14% L
15
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at halftime in 57% of games and wins 71%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Tersana - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.00
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.8
Average goals per game0.61.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Kahraba Ismailia - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.60
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game1.21.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+4+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Tersana
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Kahraba Ismailia
ScoredConceded
5
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Tersana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Kahraba Ismailia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.83
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
194%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
45%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 38% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

TersanaLigaKahraba Ismailia
Average goals per game▼ 1.572.21▲ 2.43
Both teams scored▼ 43%46%▼ 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 14%39%▲ 43%
Clean sheets▲ 43%33%▲ 57%
Goal before half-time▼ 57%59%▲ 71%
Goal after half-time▼ 71%76%▼ 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.21
Average goals per game
46%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / game
0.96
Away goals / game
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

FAQ

When do Tersana and Kahraba Ismailia play?

Tersana face Kahraba Ismailia on October 8, 2026 in Second Division at Mit Okba Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tersana vs Kahraba Ismailia?

Tersana score 0.86 goals per game on average and Kahraba Ismailia 1.86. The Second Division average is 2.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Tersana's matches and 29% of Kahraba Ismailia's.

What form are Tersana and Kahraba Ismailia in?

Over the last 5 games Tersana have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Kahraba Ismailia 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tersana vs Kahraba Ismailia?

The statistical background for Tersana vs Kahraba Ismailia — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.