Tersana vs Olympic El Qanah: match statistics
Olympic El Qanah is the decided favorite of this meeting, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 12 wins, 6 draws, and only 1 defeat. The visiting team presents exceptional efficiency on away grounds – 80% wins, 90% clean sheets, and merely 0.1 average goals conceded per away match. Tersana, placed in the 10th position, has weaker form with 40% of matches ending without scoring a goal at home and a goal difference of 16:15. Olympic El Qanah also exhibits better form in the last 5 matches (2.4 points per match vs 1.6 for Tersana) and an advantage in goal difference (+14 away vs +4 Tersana at home). Considering all these factors, a victory for the guests is the most probable scenario.
Tersana vs Olympic El Qanah: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Tersana played against Olympic El Qanah in Second Division (Egypt). The game was played on January 22, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Tersana has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Olympic El Qanah has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Tersana scores 0.84 goals per game and allows 0.79. Olympic El Qanah scores 1.58 and allows 0.53. Games in this league average 1.91 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 32% of Tersana's games and 42% of Olympic El Qanah's. The Over 2.5 rates are 21% and 32%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 31% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Olympic El Qanah has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.24 per game. Tersana takes 7.5 shots per game, while Olympic El Qanah takes 9.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Tersana leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.37 goals per game after halftime. Olympic El Qanah leads at halftime in 42% and scores 0.95 after halftime.
When the teams score
Tersana's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). For Olympic El Qanah, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 1.91 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 31% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Olympic El Qanah is the decided favorite of this meeting, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 12 wins, 6 draws, and only 1 defeat. The visiting team presents exceptional efficiency on away grounds – 80% wins, 90% clean sheets, and merely 0.1 average goals conceded per away match. Tersana, placed in the 10th position, has weaker form with 40% of matches ending without scoring a goal at home and a goal difference of 16:15. Olympic El Qanah also exhibits better form in the last 5 matches (2.4 points per match vs 1.6 for Tersana) and an advantage in goal difference (+14 away vs +4 Tersana at home). Considering all these factors, a victory for the guests is the most probable scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Tersana | Olympic El Qanah | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Olympic El Qanah is 88% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Tersana · 3 pts / game - Olympic El Qanah
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Olympic El Qanah is 88% better for: goals scored per game.
0.84 goals / game - Tersana · 1.58 goals / game - Olympic El Qanah
Olympic El Qanah is 49% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.79 goals / game - Tersana · 0.53 goals / game - Olympic El Qanah
Tersana scores in 53% of games (10 of 19 meczów), while Olympic El Qanah keeps a clean sheet in 53% (10 of 19 meczów).
Olympic El Qanah scores in 89% of games (17 of 19 meczów), while Tersana keeps a clean sheet in 42% (8 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tersana
Over / Under - Olympic El Qanah
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Olympic El Qanah is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.37 pts / game - Tersana · 1.74 pts / game - Olympic El Qanah
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tersana - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Olympic El Qanah - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Tersana
Olympic El Qanah
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Tersana | Liga | Olympic El Qanah | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.63 | 1.91 | ▲ 2.11 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 32% | 40% | ▲ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 21% | 31% | • 32% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 42% | 38% | ▲ 53% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 42% | 51% | ▲ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 63% | 69% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Tersana's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Olympic El Qanah. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Tersana vs Olympic El Qanah?
The Second Division match finished Tersana 0:2 Olympic El Qanah. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tersana vs Olympic El Qanah?
Tersana score 0.84 goals per game on average and Olympic El Qanah 1.58. The Second Division average is 1.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Tersana's matches and 42% of Olympic El Qanah's.
What form are Tersana and Olympic El Qanah in?
Over the last 5 games Tersana have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Olympic El Qanah 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tersana vs Olympic El Qanah?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.