Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of 16 July 2026

Tersana vs Olympic El Qanah: match statistics

Tersana crest
Tersana
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Olympic El Qanah crest
Olympic El Qanah
125%(3.95)
X20%(2.80)
255%(2.05)

Olympic El Qanah is the decided favorite of this meeting, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 12 wins, 6 draws, and only 1 defeat. The visiting team presents exceptional efficiency on away grounds – 80% wins, 90% clean sheets, and merely 0.1 average goals conceded per away match. Tersana, placed in the 10th position, has weaker form with 40% of matches ending without scoring a goal at home and a goal difference of 16:15. Olympic El Qanah also exhibits better form in the last 5 matches (2.4 points per match vs 1.6 for Tersana) and an advantage in goal difference (+14 away vs +4 Tersana at home). Considering all these factors, a victory for the guests is the most probable scenario.

Tersana vs Olympic El Qanah: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tersana play Olympic El Qanah in Second Division (Egypt). The match date is 22 January 2026 at 13:30. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Tersana: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Olympic El Qanah: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tersana scores 0.91 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. Olympic El Qanah scores 1.65 and concedes 0.56. League average: 1.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tersana 41%, Olympic El Qanah 44%. Over 2.5: Tersana 26%, Olympic El Qanah 38%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Olympic El Qanah has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.28. Tersana: 8.4 shots per match, Olympic El Qanah: 9.8.

Match halves

Tersana: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.38. Olympic El Qanah: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Tersana: 0-15 (8 goals). Olympic El Qanah: 76-90+ (19 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Olympic El Qanah is the decided favorite of this meeting, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 12 wins, 6 draws, and only 1 defeat. The visiting team presents exceptional efficiency on away grounds – 80% wins, 90% clean sheets, and merely 0.1 average goals conceded per away match. Tersana, placed in the 10th position, has weaker form with 40% of matches ending without scoring a goal at home and a goal difference of 16:15. Olympic El Qanah also exhibits better form in the last 5 matches (2.4 points per match vs 1.6 for Tersana) and an advantage in goal difference (+14 away vs +4 Tersana at home). Considering all these factors, a victory for the guests is the most probable scenario.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
20Shots14
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
8Shots on target8
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
2.27xG1.78
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
4Corners6
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
64Dangerous attacks47
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
12Fouls19
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
0Cards0
TersanaOlympic El Qanah

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

TersanaOlympic El Qanah
0.91Goals scored / match1.65
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
0.94Goals conceded / match0.56
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
44%Average possession44%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
3.35Shots on target / match4.06
TersanaOlympic El Qanah

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.38Shots per match9.82
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
3.35Shots on target4.06
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
10.9%Shot conversion16.8%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
44%Possession44%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
1.28xG for1.46
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
1.14xG against1.27
TersanaOlympic El Qanah

Shooting quality

Tersana: BalancedOlympic El Qanah: Counter-attacking
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
Accuracy (shots on target)40%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tersana
DWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W47% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-16-10
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-7-4
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Olympic El Qanah
LDWLW
Season result split
65% W26% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
22-9-3
2.21 pts / match · goal difference +37
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
11-4-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Olympic El Qanah is 81% better for: goals scored per match.

0.91 goals / match - Tersana · 1.65 goals / match - Olympic El Qanah

Olympic El Qanah is 68% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.94 goals / match - Tersana · 0.56 goals / match - Olympic El Qanah

Tersana scoring profile: mixed

Tersana scores in 56% of matches (19 of 34 matches), while Olympic El Qanah keeps a clean sheet in 53% (18 of 34 matches).

Olympic El Qanah scoring profile: very strong

Olympic El Qanah scores in 91% of matches (31 of 34 matches), while Tersana keeps a clean sheet in 35% (12 of 34 matches).

31Goals scored (season)56
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
32Goals conceded (season)19
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
1.85Average goals in match2.21
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
7Goals scored (last 5)7
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
TersanaOlympic El Qanah

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal91%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
21%2 goals47%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
12%3 goals21%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
3%4 goals6%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal47%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
21%2 goals9%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
6%3 goals0%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
3%4 goals0%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

44%
Olympic El Qanah - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 34 matches
41%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time9%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
6%BTTS in both halves0%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
18%Scored in both halves24%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
80%BTTS - last 580%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah

2nd half

59%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
21%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Olympic El Qanah is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - Tersana · 1.62 pts / match - Olympic El Qanah

Tersana - half-time state
18% leading71% draw12% trailing
Olympic El Qanah - half-time state
38% leading47% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.62
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.56
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.24
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
0.94Average goals (1st half)0.79
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
65%Clean sheet before half-time76%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
59%No goal before half-time56%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)2
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)1
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.29
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
0.91Average goals (2nd half)1.29
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
56%Clean sheet after half-time74%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah
68%No goal after half-time32%
TersanaOlympic El Qanah

Tersana - second-half results

18% W53% R29% P
42
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Olympic El Qanah - second-half results

59% W24% R18% P
55
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
68
Second-half points
+24
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding171%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tersana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match1.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.80.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6
Olympic El Qanah - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tersana
ScoredConceded
8
2
0-15
3
6
16-30
7
6
31-45
3
3
46-60
2
4
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Olympic El Qanah
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
5
2
16-30
10
4
31-45
8
3
46-60
7
0
61-75
19
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.03
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tersana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Olympic El Qanah

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.90
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-16.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.71
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
179%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.81
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
34% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
34%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

TersanaLigaOlympic El Qanah
Average goals in match 1.851.95 2.21
Both teams scored 41%41% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 26%32% 38%
Clean sheets 35%38% 53%
Goal before half-time 53%53% 59%
Goal after half-time 59%67% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.95
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.92
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tersana 0 - 1 - 0 Olympic El Qanah. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Olympic El Qanah
1 : 1
Tersana

FAQ

What was the result of Tersana vs Olympic El Qanah?

The Second Division match finished Tersana 0:2 Olympic El Qanah. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tersana vs Olympic El Qanah?

Tersana score 0.91 goals per game on average and Olympic El Qanah 1.65. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Tersana's matches and 44% of Olympic El Qanah's.

What form are Tersana and Olympic El Qanah in?

Over the last 5 games Tersana have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Olympic El Qanah 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tersana vs Olympic El Qanah?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.