Tersana vs Proxy: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates a close competition with a leaning towards a draw. Tersana presents stable home form with a goal difference of +2 and 42% clean sheets, yet only 33% wins at home. Proxy stands out with an excellent recent streak – unbeaten in the last 5 matches (2 wins, 3 draws) and only 1 goal conceded, confirming their defensive solidity. The visitors have better scoring efficiency (16% conversion vs 9% for the hosts) and higher PPG (1.8 vs 1.2), but their average away result involves 45% draws. Considering the defensive stability of both teams (xGA hosts 1.05, visitors 1.47) and Proxy's tendency to draw on the road, the most probable scenario is a sharing of points.
Tersana vs Proxy: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Tersana played against Proxy in Second Division (Egypt). The game was played on February 26, 2026. Final score: 3:3.
Recent form
Tersana has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Proxy has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Tersana scores 0.74 goals per game and allows 0.78. Proxy scores 1.00 and allows 0.91. Games in this league average 1.85 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 30% of Tersana's games and 57% of Proxy's. The Over 2.5 rates are 17% and 35%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 29% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Proxy has the higher season xG average, 1.34 to 1.30 per game. Tersana takes 8.3 shots per game, while Proxy takes 7.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Tersana leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.35 goals per game after halftime. Proxy leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.52 after halftime.
When the teams score
Tersana's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). For Proxy, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 1.85 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 29% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates a close competition with a leaning towards a draw. Tersana presents stable home form with a goal difference of +2 and 42% clean sheets, yet only 33% wins at home. Proxy stands out with an excellent recent streak – unbeaten in the last 5 matches (2 wins, 3 draws) and only 1 goal conceded, confirming their defensive solidity. The visitors have better scoring efficiency (16% conversion vs 9% for the hosts) and higher PPG (1.8 vs 1.2), but their average away result involves 45% draws. Considering the defensive stability of both teams (xGA hosts 1.05, visitors 1.47) and Proxy's tendency to draw on the road, the most probable scenario is a sharing of points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Tersana | Proxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.19 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Proxy is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Tersana · 1.8 pts / game - Proxy
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Proxy is 35% better for: goals scored per game.
0.74 goals / game - Tersana · 1 goals / game - Proxy
Tersana is 17% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.78 goals / game - Tersana · 0.91 goals / game - Proxy
Tersana scores in 48% of games (11 of 23 games), while Proxy keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 games).
Proxy scores in 74% of games (17 of 23 games), while Tersana keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tersana
Over / Under - Proxy
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tersana - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Proxy - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Tersana
Proxy
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Tersana | Liga | Proxy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.52 | 1.85 | • 1.91 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 30% | 40% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 17% | 29% | ▲ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 39% | • 39% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 39% | 51% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 61% | 66% | • 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- ProxyGoalMohamed Gamal Fahim
- ProxyGoalAmr Marei
Head-to-head
Record from Tersana's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Proxy. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Tersana vs Proxy?
The Second Division match finished Tersana 3:3 Proxy. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tersana vs Proxy?
Tersana score 0.74 goals per game on average and Proxy 1.00. The Second Division average is 1.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Tersana's matches and 57% of Proxy's.
What form are Tersana and Proxy in?
Over the last 5 games Tersana have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Proxy 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tersana vs Proxy?
The statistical background for Tersana vs Proxy — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.