Tersana vs Raya Ghazl: match statistics
Tersana vs Raya Ghazl: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Tersana played against Raya Ghazl in Second Division (Egypt). The game was played on April 10, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Tersana has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Raya Ghazl has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Tersana scores 0.82 goals per game and allows 0.96. Raya Ghazl scores 0.64 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 1.90 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 36% of Tersana's games and 43% of Raya Ghazl's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 39%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 31% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Tersana has the higher season xG average, 1.29 to 1.17 per game. Tersana takes 8.5 shots per game, while Raya Ghazl takes 7.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Tersana leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.39 goals per game after halftime. Raya Ghazl leads at halftime in 11% and scores 0.43 after halftime.
When the teams score
Tersana's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). For Raya Ghazl, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 1.90 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 31% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1). Tersana averages 1.14 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.41, while Raya Ghazl averages only 0.23 goals on the road with xG 1.18. The hosts register 10.46 shots per game with 4.77 on target at home, versus Raya Ghazl’s 8.73 shots and 3.0 on target away; with shot conversion rates of 11% vs 2% Tersana both creates and converts chances markedly better. Defensively the teams are comparable (Tersana concedes 1.00 goals at home, Raya Ghazl 1.08 away), but the visitors have 77% of away games without scoring versus 43% for the hosts, which undermines their offensive potential. Recent form over the last five matches is poor for both (0.4 pts/match for Tersana vs 0.8 pts/match for Raya Ghazl), however the lack of away wins (away win rate = 0%) and Raya Ghazl’s negative away goal difference (-11) favor the home side. Therefore I assign Tersana a 65% chance to win, 20% for a draw and 15% for an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I forecast BTTS - No. Raya Ghazl have very low away offense: only 0.23 goals per game and away BTTS 23% on the season (last 5: 20%). Tersana score 1.0 at home and have season BTTS 60% (last 5: 60%), but they concede 1.4 at home and have conceded 9 goals in the last 5 (1.8 per game), showing home defensive vulnerability. xG is similar (1.17 for Tersana vs 1.18 for Raya), however Raya’s shot conversion is only 2% versus Tersana’s 12%, so the visitors create chances but fail to convert. Additionally Raya have 38% clean sheets on the season (Tersana 20%), and league BTTS frequency is 39%, which all together favors a single scorer rather than Goal/Goal. Therefore I rate ~70% No and ~30% Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I calculated expected goals as the average of offensive xG and opponents’ xG: Tersana 1.28 (offensive xG 1.17 and xG against 1.39), Raya Ghazl 1.39 (offensive xG 1.18 and xG against 1.59), total 2.67 goals. A Poisson model with λ=2.67 yields probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) ≈75%, at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) ≈50% and at least 4 goals (Over 3.5) ≈28%. Team data support this view: Tersana have 80% of home matches with ≥2 goals and have scored 6 goals in the last 5 matches (1.2 avg), while Raya have a very low scoring rate 0.23 goals this season with xG 1.18 and a conversion rate of 2%. Additionally, Tersana concede 1.4 goals per match and season BTTS is 60% for hosts vs 23% for guests, so the expected total ~2.67 goals gives a clear edge on the Over 1.5 line; therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Both teams frequently draw at half-time: the home side drew in 60% of matches and the visitors in 69%, yielding approximately a 64% chance of a HT draw; additionally, the home team averages 0.33 goals by the break and the visitors 0.08, so the first half is likely to be low-scoring. In the second half the home team is clearly more dangerous — home second-half goals average 0.67 versus 0.15 for the away team, and average goals in second halves are 1.6 for homes versus 1.0 for guests. The home team collected 21 points in matches with goals after the break, while the visitors only 6 points, and the visitors have yet to record a win this season (0% wins), which reduces their chances of a full-time victory. Both teams’ xG is similar (1.17 vs 1.18), but the home conversion rate of 12% versus the visitors’ 2% and the fact that the hosts scored six goals between the 76th and 90th minutes support a scenario of a draw at half-time and a home turnaround by full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Tersana | Raya Ghazl | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Raya Ghazl is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Tersana · 0.8 pts / game - Raya Ghazl
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tersana is 28% better for: goals scored per game.
0.82 goals / game - Tersana · 0.64 goals / game - Raya Ghazl
Tersana is 30% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.96 goals / game - Tersana · 1.25 goals / game - Raya Ghazl
Tersana scores in 50% of games (14 of 28 meczów), while Raya Ghazl keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 meczów).
Raya Ghazl scores in 50% of games (14 of 28 meczów), while Tersana keeps a clean sheet in 36% (10 of 28 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tersana
Over / Under - Raya Ghazl
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tersana is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / game - Tersana · 0.96 pts / game - Raya Ghazl
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tersana - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Raya Ghazl - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 14%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Tersana
Raya Ghazl
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Tersana | Liga | Raya Ghazl | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.79 | 1.90 | • 1.89 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 40% | ▲ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 25% | 31% | ▲ 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 36% | 39% | ▼ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | • 50% | 51% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 61% | 67% | ▲ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- TersanaGoalMohammed Shiraz
Head-to-head
Record from Tersana's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Raya Ghazl. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Tersana vs Raya Ghazl?
The Second Division match finished Tersana 1:0 Raya Ghazl. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tersana vs Raya Ghazl?
Tersana score 0.82 goals per game on average and Raya Ghazl 0.64. The Second Division average is 1.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Tersana's matches and 43% of Raya Ghazl's.
What form are Tersana and Raya Ghazl in?
Over the last 5 games Tersana have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Raya Ghazl 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tersana vs Raya Ghazl?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


