Thór vs ÍBV: match statistics
Thór vs ÍBV: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Thór played against ÍBV in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on June 14, 2026. Venue: Þórsvöllur. Final score: 1:4.
Recent form
Thór has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. ÍBV has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Thór scores 0.78 goals per game and allows 2.56. ÍBV scores 1.56 and allows 2.56. Games in this league average 4.02 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of Thór's games and 78% of ÍBV's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 67%, compared with league averages of 71% for BTTS and 73% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
ÍBV has the higher season xG average, 1.29 to 1.25 per game. Thór takes 11.3 shots per game, while ÍBV takes 10.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Thór leads at halftime in 11% of its games and scores 0.56 goals per game after halftime. ÍBV leads at halftime in 22% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Thór's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). For ÍBV, it is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Úrvalsdeild games average 4.02 goals. Both teams score in 71% of games, and 73% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Both teams have weak seasons, but the stronger case is with ÍBV: the visitors in the last 5 matches have a record of 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, scoring 9 and conceding 9 goals, while Thór lost all 5 games, scoring only 2 and conceding 13. Thór at home averages 0.75 goals per game with 12.5 shots and 4 on target, and their xG for is 1.37, however xG against is as high as 2.01 and seasonally they concede on average 1.5 goals at home. ÍBV away averages 11 shots and 2.75 on target, 1.0 goals and xG for 1.28, and shot conversion is 9% versus 6% for the hosts, which gives the visitors an advantage in efficiency and control (52% possession). At the same time it must be noted that ÍBV have not yet won away this season (win% 0) and concede on average 2.75 goals away, with an away goal difference of -7, so the risk of a draw or a home upset exists. Considering the advantage in goals scored in the last 5 (9 vs 2), better conversion and a positive points trend for the visitors, I predict an ÍBV victory; I assess the chances as: home 20%, draw 30%, away 50%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have very high seasonal BTTS rates: Thór 80% and ÍBV 75%, while the league BTTS level is 71%, strongly favoring a both-teams-to-score scenario. Seasonally Thór averages 2.0 goals scored and concedes 2.4 per match, and ÍBV scores 1.0 and concedes 2.75, with both sides having 23 goals conceded this season, suggesting a high probability of goal exchange. In the last 5 matches Thór form is 'lllll', scoring on average 0.4 goals and posting BTTS 40%, whereas ÍBV in their last 5 matches averages 1.8 goals and has BTTS 60%, which weakens the signal only on the home side. xG is similar: xG for 1.30 (Thór) vs 1.28 (ÍBV) and xG against 1.54 vs 1.71, and the absence of clean sheets (0% for both teams) plus higher shot conversion for Thór 19% versus 9% for ÍBV and more shots on target 4.4 vs 2.75 strengthen the both-teams-to-score perspective. Considering seasonal 80%/75%, league 71%, and similar xG and shooting stats, I assess BTTS at 73% vs 27% and recommend a 'BTTS - Yes' bet as the strongest signal from the data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have 100% of matches this season with over 1.5 goals (Thór 100%, ÍBV 100%), and the league goals average is 4.02, which strongly supports Over 1.5. Based on xG and opponents' defensive stats I estimate 1.51 expected goals for the home side (xG_for 1.30 vs xG_against_away 1.71) and 1.41 for the visitors (xG_for 1.28 vs xG_against_home 1.54), a total of 2.92 goals. Additionally, Thór concedes on average 2.4 goals per match, ÍBV 2.75, both teams have 0% clean sheets and high BTTS: 80% (Thór) and 75% (ÍBV), which increases the probability of goals from both sides. Although Thór has scored only 2 goals in the last 5 matches and lost five times (form L5: lllll), the high league Over 2.5 rate (73%) and seasonal Over 2.5: 60% (Thór) and 75% (ÍBV) provide further backing for goals; therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The hosts led at the break in 40% of their matches, while the visitors have never led at halftime (0%), so Thór are the first-half favorites. At halftime the hosts average 0.8 goals versus 0.25 for ÍBV; additionally Thór register an average of 4.4 shots on target with a 19% conversion rate compared to 2.75 shots on target and a 9% conversion rate for the visitors, indicating a clear efficiency advantage. ÍBV have not won this season (0% wins), while Thór have a 20% win rate, which reduces the likelihood of a turnaround after the break. Seasonally both teams have scored in 80% of the hosts’ matches and 75% of the visitors’ matches, but both teams score less frequently by halftime (20% and 25%), so halftime goals are usually one-sided; this reinforces the scenario of the hosts taking a lead and holding it. Therefore the most likely scenario is 1/1 — I assign it 31% — with alternatives being draw at halftime and draw at fulltime (X/X 18%) or draw HT and home win (X/1 16%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Thór | ÍBV | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
ÍBV is 100% better for: goals scored per game.
0.78 goals / game - Thór · 1.56 goals / game - ÍBV
Thór scores in 56% of games (5 of 9 meczów), while ÍBV keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 9 meczów).
ÍBV scores in 78% of games (7 of 9 meczów), while Thór keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Thór
Over / Under - ÍBV
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
ÍBV is 66% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.67 pts / game - Thór · 1.11 pts / game - ÍBV
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Thór - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
ÍBV - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 11%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Thór
ÍBV
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| Thór | Liga | ÍBV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.33 | 4.02 | • 4.11 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 71% | ▲ 78% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 67% | 73% | ▼ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 15% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 78% | 82% | ▼ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | • 89% | 89% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Thór vs ÍBV?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished Thór 1:4 ÍBV. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Thór vs ÍBV?
Thór score 0.78 goals per game on average and ÍBV 1.56. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Thór's matches and 78% of ÍBV's.
What form are Thór and ÍBV in?
Over the last 5 games Thór have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and ÍBV 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Thór vs ÍBV?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Thór vs ÍBV: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.