Thun vs Young Boys: match statistics
Thun vs Young Boys: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Thun play Young Boys in Super League (Switzerland). The match date is 14 May 2026 at 16:30. Final score: 3:8.
Current form
Thun: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Young Boys: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Thun scores 2.11 and concedes 1.37 goals per match. Young Boys scores 2.11 and concedes 1.82. League average: 3.29 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Thun 71%, Young Boys 68%. Over 2.5: Thun 74%, Young Boys 74%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.
xG, shots and style
Thun has higher xG: 1.87 vs 1.74. Thun: 17.1 shots per match, Young Boys: 15.3.
Match halves
Thun: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.21. Young Boys: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 1.34.
Goals by minute
Thun: 46-60 (17 goals). Young Boys: 76-90+ (18 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super League: 3.29 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.
Head-to-head
3 H2H matches: 2-0-1. Average goals 4.67, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Thun holds a clear advantage in home metrics: at home they average 2.33 goals per game with 17.5 shots and 6.39 shots on target, and they have 76 goals on the season. Young Boys average 1.61 goals away with 13.17 shots and 4.17 shots on target, indicating lower offensive efficiency from the visitors. Defensively the hosts concede 1.17 goals at home versus 2.28 conceded by Young Boys on the road, and xG values also favor Thun (xG for 1.97 vs 1.46; xG against both 1.66). However, Thun’s poorer form in the last 5 matches should be noted – only 1 win, 4 defeats, 0.6 points per game and 4 scored vs 8 conceded; Young Boys in their last 5 have 1 win, 2 draws, 1.0 point per game and 8 goals scored. Given the home statistical edge (67% home win rate vs Young Boys’ 28% away win rate) and superior shot, xG and goals-against averages, I favor a Thun victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Thun | Young Boys | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Young Boys is 600% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Thun · 1.4 pts / match - Young Boys
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Thun is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.37 goals / match - Thun · 1.82 goals / match - Young Boys
Thun scores in 87% of matches (33 of 38 matches), while Young Boys keeps a clean sheet in 21% (8 of 38 matches).
Young Boys scores in 84% of matches (32 of 38 matches), while Thun keeps a clean sheet in 16% (6 of 38 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Thun
Over / Under — Young Boys
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Thun is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.61 pts / match - Thun · 1.37 pts / match - Young Boys
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Thun - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Young Boys - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 3.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Thun
Young Boys
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Thun | Liga | Young Boys | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.47 | 3.29 | ▲ 3.92 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 71% | 66% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 74% | 67% | ▲ 74% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 19% | ▲ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | • 76% | 76% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 85% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Thun 2 - 0 - 1 Young Boys. Average goals 4.67, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Thun vs Young Boys?
The Super League match finished Thun 3:8 Young Boys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Thun and Young Boys?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Thun won 2, Young Boys won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Thun vs Young Boys?
Thun score 2.11 goals per game on average and Young Boys 2.11. The Super League average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Thun's matches and 68% of Young Boys's.
What form are Thun and Young Boys in?
Over the last 5 games Thun have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Young Boys 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Thun vs Young Boys?
The statistical background for Thun vs Young Boys — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.