China - Chinese Super LeagueData current as of September 08, 2026

Tianjin Teda vs Chengdu Better City FC: match statistics

Tianjin Teda vs Chengdu Better City FC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Tianjin Teda played against Chengdu Better City FC in Chinese Super League (China). The game was played on May 15, 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Tianjin Teda has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Chengdu Better City FC has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Tianjin Teda scores 1.36 goals per game and allows 1.45. Chengdu Better City FC scores 2.73 and allows 0.82. Games in this league average 2.94 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 64% of Tianjin Teda's games and 55% of Chengdu Better City FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 73%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Chengdu Better City FC has the higher season xG average, 1.81 to 1.03 per game. Tianjin Teda takes 9.1 shots per game, while Chengdu Better City FC takes 15.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Tianjin Teda leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.82 goals per game after halftime. Chengdu Better City FC leads at halftime in 45% and scores 1.64 after halftime.

When the teams score

Tianjin Teda's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Chengdu Better City FC, it is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Chinese Super League games average 2.94 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the away win (2): Chengdu Better City FC sit 1st with a record of 10 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, while Tianjin Teda are 16th with 2 wins, 5 draws and 4 losses. Offensively the visitors have 30 goals this season and average 2.0 goals away, and they scored 13 goals in the last 5 matches, whereas the hosts have 15 goals this season and 9 in their last five. Chengdu also create more high-quality chances — average xG for the visitors is 1.51 per match versus 0.99 for Tianjin (a 0.52 xG gap), and their average shots of 12.2 with 4.4 on target is superior to the hosts’ 8.4 and 2.8. Defensively the visitors concede 1.2 goals on average away compared to the hosts’ 1.6 at home and have 40% clean sheets on the road, while Tianjin have 20% clean sheets. Additionally Chengdu average 3.0 points in the last 5 matches and have won all five, whereas Tianjin average 1.2 points in their last 5 and have a 0% home win rate, so I assign 70% probability to the visitors, 20% to a draw and 10% to the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistics favor the BTTS scenario: league BTTS rate is 60%, with season BTTS at 50% for Tianjin and 60% for Chengdu. In the last 5 matches the home side had BTTS 100% (scoring on average 1.8 and conceding 1.6), while the away side has 40% BTTS in their last 5, although they score 2.6 and concede only 0.6 on average in that period. xG indicates the home team generates 2.06 xG versus the away defense's xG against of 1.29 (difference ~0.77), and the away team has 1.51 xG against the home defense's 1.10 xG against (difference ~0.41), suggesting both sides create scoring opportunities. Additionally, the home side averages 7.17 shots on target versus 4.4 for the visitors, and home matches finish over 2.5 goals in 83% of cases, which increases the likelihood of goals from both teams. Although Tianjin has 50% clean sheets this season and concedes on average 0.5 goals per season, the overall signal (league 60%, season BTTS 50/60 and recent form) leans towards selecting BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Tianjin averages 3.33 goals scored at home and 0.50 conceded, while Chengdu averages 2.00 scored and 1.20 conceded; xG is 2.06 for Tianjin and 1.51 for Chengdu. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 9 goals (1.8 avg) and conceded 8 (1.6), whereas the visitors scored 13 (2.6 avg) and conceded only 3 (0.6), indicating offensive momentum from both sides. Averaging attack and defense via xG yields an expected 1.68 goals for the hosts and 1.31 for the visitors (total 2.99), clearly above 2.5 and close to 3.0. Seasonal indicators support this forecast: 83% of the hosts' matches are Over 2.5 versus 60% for the guests, and shots 17.33 vs 12.2, shots on target 7.17 vs 4.4 and conversion 19% vs 16% demonstrate an advantage in chance creation; therefore I estimate a high probability for Over 2.5 (~74%) and an even higher one for Over 1.5 (~88%). Given the combination of high xG, dominance in shots and seasonal Over metrics, I select Over 1.5 as the strongest and least risky signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Tianjin Teda have led at the break in 4 of their matches so far (67%), averaging 1.5 goals by half-time versus Chengdu’s 0.6, which clearly indicates a home advantage after 45 minutes. Seasonally the hosts score on average 3.33 goals and concede 0.5, while the visitors register 2.0 scored and 1.2 conceded; xG is 2.06 versus 1.51 in Tianjin’s favor, confirming the quality of created chances. Tianjin average 7.17 shots on target (17.33 total) with a 19% conversion rate compared to Chengdu’s 4.4 on target (12.2 total) and 16% conversion, so greater pressure and efficiency favor maintaining a lead. Chengdu, however, have won 5 of their last 5 matches (100% form), and both teams often score after the break (Tianjin averages 1.83 second-half goals, Chengdu 1.4), so there is a risk of a turnaround; nevertheless the most likely scenario is the hosts leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1) — I assign this a 50% probability.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

47Possession (%)53
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
10Shots12
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
3Shots on target5
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
1.12xG1.4
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
3Corners5
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
37Dangerous attacks39
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
10Fouls10
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
4Cards2
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
1.36Goals scored / game2.73
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
1.45Goals allowed / game0.82
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
43%Average possession56%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
3.36Shots on target / game5.91
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.09Shots per game15
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
3.36Shots on target5.91
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
15%Shot conversion18.2%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
43%Possession56%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
1.03xG for1.81
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
1.62xG against1.19
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC

Shooting quality

Tianjin Teda: Counter-attackingChengdu Better City FC: Dominant
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
Accuracy (shots on target)37%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.46

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Chengdu Better City FC is 150% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Tianjin Teda · 3 pts / game - Chengdu Better City FC

Tianjin Teda
LWDDD
Season result split
18% W45% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-4
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-3-2
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
DLDLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%
Chengdu Better City FC
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
91% W9% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-1-0
2.82 pts / game · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chengdu Better City FC is 101% better for: goals scored per game.

1.36 goals / game - Tianjin Teda · 2.73 goals / game - Chengdu Better City FC

Chengdu Better City FC is 77% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.45 goals / game - Tianjin Teda · 0.82 goals / game - Chengdu Better City FC

Tianjin Teda scoring profile: strong

Tianjin Teda scores in 73% of games (8 of 11 meczów), while Chengdu Better City FC keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 meczów).

Chengdu Better City FC scoring profile: very strong

Chengdu Better City FC scores in 100% of games (11 of 11 meczów), while Tianjin Teda keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 meczów).

15Goals scored (season)30
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
16Goals conceded (season)9
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
2.82Average goals per game3.55
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
9Goals scored (last 5)13
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
8Goals conceded (last 5)3
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal100%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
36%2 goals73%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
18%3 goals55%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
9%4 goals27%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal55%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
45%2 goals18%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
18%3 goals9%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
0%4 goals0%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

55%
Chengdu Better City FC - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 11 meczów
60%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time18%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
9%BTTS in both halves0%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
27%Scored in both halves55%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
100%BTTS - last 540%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
73%Min. 2 goals after half-time64%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chengdu Better City FC is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.45 pts / game - Tianjin Teda · 1.73 pts / game - Chengdu Better City FC

Tianjin Teda - half-time state
27% leading64% draw9% trailing
Chengdu Better City FC - half-time state
45% leading36% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.45Points per game (1st half)1.73
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
0.55Goals scored (1st half)1.09
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
0.82Average goals (1st half)1.45
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
73%Clean sheet before half-time73%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
55%No goal before half-time45%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.82Points per game (2nd half)2.73
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
0.82Goals scored (2nd half)1.64
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
1.18Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
2Average goals (2nd half)2.09
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
27%Clean sheet after half-time73%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC
45%No goal after half-time0%
Tianjin TedaChengdu Better City FC

Tianjin Teda - second-half results

9% W55% R36% P
16
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 18%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.9

Allows 0.9 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Chengdu Better City FC - second-half results

91% W0% R9% P
19
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding202%

Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 91%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tianjin Teda - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.800.80
Goals scored / game0.81.0
Goals allowed / game0.21.4
Average goals per game1.02.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Chengdu Better City FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.403.00
Goals scored / game1.01.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.0
Average goals per game1.61.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+2+8
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Tianjin Teda
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
5
2
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
3
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Chengdu Better City FC
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
4
1
16-30
7
2
31-45
1
0
46-60
4
2
61-75
13
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.18
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Tianjin Teda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

Chengdu Better City FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.62
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.92
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
235%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
46%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).

Teams vs league

Tianjin TedaLigaChengdu Better City FC
Average goals per game 2.822.94 3.55
Both teams scored 64%60% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%58% 73%
Clean sheets 18%22% 45%
Goal before half-time 55%67% 64%
Goal after half-time 82%89% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.94
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / game
1.16
Away goals / game
+53%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defensive advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tianjin TedaGoalXianjun WangAssist: Aitor Córdoba Querejeta
  2. Tianjin TedaYellow cardJiahui Huang
  3. Chengdu Better City FCGoalShihao Wei
  4. Chengdu Better City FCYellow cardYang Li
  5. Chengdu Better City FCSubstitutionOn: Pengfei HanOff: Yang Li
  6. Chengdu Better City FCSubstitutionOn: Yiran HeOff: Dongsheng Wang
  7. Chengdu Better City FCGoalShihao WeiAssist: Wellington Alves da Silva
  8. Tianjin TedaSubstitutionOn: Guilherme Schettine GuimarãesOff: Qiuming Wang
  9. Tianjin TedaYellow cardJaume Grau Ciscar
  10. Tianjin TedaYellow cardMing Him Sun
  11. Chengdu Better City FCSubstitutionOn: Ziming WangOff: Abuduwaili Baihelamu
  12. Chengdu Better City FCYellow cardRômulo Jose Pacheco da Silva
  13. Chengdu Better City FCSubstitutionOn: Chao GanOff: Lisheng Liao
  14. Chengdu Better City FCSubstitutionOn: Yanfeng DongOff: Rômulo Jose Pacheco da Silva
  15. Tianjin TedaYellow cardAlberto Quiles Piosa

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Tianjin Teda's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Chengdu Better City FC. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Tianjin Teda FC
2 : 1
Chengdu Better City FC
Chengdu Better City FC
1 : 2
Tianjin Teda FC

FAQ

What was the result of Tianjin Teda vs Chengdu Better City FC?

The Chinese Super League match finished Tianjin Teda 1:2 Chengdu Better City FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tianjin Teda and Chengdu Better City FC?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Tianjin Teda won 2, Chengdu Better City FC won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tianjin Teda vs Chengdu Better City FC?

Tianjin Teda score 1.36 goals per game on average and Chengdu Better City FC 2.73. The Chinese Super League average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Tianjin Teda's matches and 55% of Chengdu Better City FC's.

What form are Tianjin Teda and Chengdu Better City FC in?

Over the last 5 games Tianjin Teda have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Chengdu Better City FC 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tianjin Teda vs Chengdu Better City FC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.