Tiszakécske vs Videoton: match statistics
Videoton show significantly better form in their last five matches, earning 2.4 points per game and recording a four-game winning streak, while Tiszakécske are managing just 1 point per game with an LWDDL form. The hosts have a negative goal difference (-2) at their own stadium and concede an average of 1.4 goals per home game, indicating defensive fragility. Videoton, despite poorer away results (20% win rate), have recently shown a marked improvement with an LWWWW form, scoring 10 goals in their last five fixtures. The difference in attacking quality (xG For: 1.61 vs 1.44) is marginal, but the visitors' superior form and confidence strongly support their victory. Given the average of 2.6-2.9 goals per match for both teams, we expect an open game with Videoton coming out on top.
Tiszakécske vs Videoton: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Tiszakécske played against Videoton in NB II (Hungary). The game was played on March 14, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Tiszakécske has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Videoton has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Tiszakécske scores 1.14 goals per game and allows 1.52. Videoton scores 1.29 and allows 1.05. Games in this league average 2.54 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 62% of Tiszakécske's games and 43% of Videoton's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 38%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Tiszakécske has the higher season xG average, 1.51 to 1.42 per game. Tiszakécske takes 11.3 shots per game, while Videoton takes 11.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Tiszakécske leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Videoton leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Tiszakécske's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). For Videoton, it is minutes 46-60 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NB II games average 2.54 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Videoton show significantly better form in their last five matches, earning 2.4 points per game and recording a four-game winning streak, while Tiszakécske are managing just 1 point per game with an LWDDL form. The hosts have a negative goal difference (-2) at their own stadium and concede an average of 1.4 goals per home game, indicating defensive fragility. Videoton, despite poorer away results (20% win rate), have recently shown a marked improvement with an LWWWW form, scoring 10 goals in their last five fixtures. The difference in attacking quality (xG For: 1.61 vs 1.44) is marginal, but the visitors' superior form and confidence strongly support their victory. Given the average of 2.6-2.9 goals per match for both teams, we expect an open game with Videoton coming out on top.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Tiszakécske | Videoton | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Videoton is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Tiszakécske · 3 pts / game - Videoton
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Videoton is 13% better for: goals scored per game.
1.14 goals / game - Tiszakécske · 1.29 goals / game - Videoton
Videoton is 45% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.52 goals / game - Tiszakécske · 1.05 goals / game - Videoton
Tiszakécske scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 meczów), while Videoton keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 meczów).
Videoton scores in 71% of games (15 of 21 meczów), while Tiszakécske keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tiszakécske
Over / Under - Videoton
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Videoton is 88% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.81 pts / game - Tiszakécske · 1.52 pts / game - Videoton
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tiszakécske - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Videoton - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Tiszakécske
Videoton
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).
Teams vs league
| Tiszakécske | Liga | Videoton | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.67 | 2.54 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 62% | 48% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 48% | 45% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 29% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 71% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 95% | 80% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Tiszakécske's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Videoton. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Tiszakécske vs Videoton?
The NB II match finished Tiszakécske 1:1 Videoton. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tiszakécske vs Videoton?
Tiszakécske score 1.14 goals per game on average and Videoton 1.29. The NB II average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Tiszakécske's matches and 43% of Videoton's.
What form are Tiszakécske and Videoton in?
Over the last 5 games Tiszakécske have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Videoton 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tiszakécske vs Videoton?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.