United States - MLS Next ProData current as of October 17, 2026

Toronto II vs Chattanooga FC: match statistics

Toronto II crest
Toronto II
2 : 2half-time 1:1
Chattanooga FC crest
Chattanooga FC

Toronto II vs Chattanooga FC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Toronto II played against Chattanooga FC in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game was played on August 14, 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

Toronto II has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Chattanooga FC has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Toronto II scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 1.90. Chattanooga FC scores 1.86 and allows 1.36. Games in this league average 3.24 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 62% of Toronto II's games and 59% of Chattanooga FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 76% and 55%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 66% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Chattanooga FC has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.27 per game. Toronto II takes 10.1 shots per game, while Chattanooga FC takes 13.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Toronto II leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Chattanooga FC leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.86 after halftime.

When the teams score

Toronto II's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Chattanooga FC, it is minutes 31-45+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS Next Pro games average 3.24 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 66% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chattanooga FC sit 5th, while Toronto II are only 23rd. Across the season, the visitors have recorded 11 wins, 6 draws and 5 defeats, compared with 7 wins and 10 losses for the hosts. The strongest argument in favor of the visitors is their current form: they have taken 11 points from their last five matches without suffering a defeat, scoring 8 goals and conceding just 2, whereas Toronto II have lost 4 of their last 5 games with a 7:10 goal difference. Chattanooga also create more chances away from home, averaging 13.1 shots and 5.2 shots on target per match, compared with Toronto II’s 10.44 shots and 4.56 shots on target. The hosts are nevertheless dangerous at home, where they average 1.89 goals and have won 56% of their matches, so their chances should not be underestimated, especially as both defenses concede around 1.8 goals per game. However, the superior quality of recent results and Chattanooga’s significantly tighter defense in recent weeks point towards an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Toronto II average 2.0 goals at home, while Chattanooga FC score 1.7 goals per match, with both teams creating a solid number of chances: their average xG figures are 1.71 and 1.57, respectively. The hosts have conceded as many as 2.0 goals per match across their last five fixtures and recorded BTTS in 80% of those games, which clearly supports a Chattanooga goal. However, Chattanooga have kept a clean sheet in 3 of their last 5 matches, conceding just 2 goals in total, so the possibility of Toronto II failing to score remains a significant risk. Nevertheless, the visitors have kept a clean sheet in only 10% of the season overall, while Toronto II have failed to score in just 8% of their matches, making a Goal/Goal scenario more likely. The BTTS - Yes pick is moderately strong, although below the league average of 61% due to Chattanooga’s recent defensive improvement.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The Over 1.5 goals line is strongly supported by both teams’ seasonal results, having landed in 75% of Toronto II’s matches and 80% of Chattanooga FC’s games. The hosts average 2.0 goals per match, while Chattanooga average 1.7, with average xG figures of 1.71 and 1.57 respectively. In addition, Toronto II have scored at least once in 92% of their matches, compared with 90% for the visitors, while Chattanooga have kept a clean sheet in only 10% of games. The expected total of 2.65 goals suggests a realistic chance of three goals, but Chattanooga’s strong recent defensive form, conceding just 0.4 goals per match across five appearances, limits the edge on Over 2.5. Therefore, Over 1.5 goals remains the safest selection.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Chattanooga FC are in clearly better current form: they have averaged 2.2 points across their last five matches, remaining unbeaten and winning three times, while Toronto II have suffered four defeats and collected just 0.6 points per game. The visitors led at the break in 80% of their last five appearances, whereas the hosts were behind at half-time in 40% of their matches over the same period. Chattanooga’s defense has conceded only 0.4 goals per game recently, including just 0.2 before half-time, while Toronto II have conceded an average of 2.0 goals over the full 90 minutes. The hosts’ season numbers are solid, with an average of 2.0 goals scored and a 67% win rate, but their current three-match losing streak significantly weakens this argument. The most likely scenario is therefore that Chattanooga will make the most of a strong start and maintain their lead until the end of the match.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

47Possession (%)53
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
9Shots17
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
3Shots on target5
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
1.11xG1.97
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
2Corners6
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
46Dangerous attacks77
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
15Fouls5
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
0Cards3
Toronto IIChattanooga FC

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Toronto IIChattanooga FC
1.67Goals scored / game1.86
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
1.9Goals allowed / game1.36
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
48%Average possession45%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
4.38Shots on target / game5.59
Toronto IIChattanooga FC

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.1Shots per game13.36
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
4.38Shots on target5.59
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
16.5%Shot conversion13.9%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
48%Possession45%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
1.27xG for1.64
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
1.67xG against1.47
Toronto IIChattanooga FC

Shooting quality

Toronto II: Efficient finishingChattanooga FC: Counter-attacking
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
Accuracy (shots on target)43%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Chattanooga FC is 83% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Toronto II · 2.2 pts / game - Chattanooga FC

Toronto II
LLWLW
Season result split
38% W14% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-10
1.29 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Chattanooga FC
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
50% W27% D23% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-5
1.77 pts / game · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-3
Last 5 away
1-3-1
LDDDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga FC is 11% better for: goals scored per game.

1.67 goals / game - Toronto II · 1.86 goals / game - Chattanooga FC

Chattanooga FC is 40% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.9 goals / game - Toronto II · 1.36 goals / game - Chattanooga FC

Toronto II scoring profile: strong

Toronto II scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 games), while Chattanooga FC keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 games).

Chattanooga FC scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga FC scores in 91% of games (20 of 22 games), while Toronto II keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 games).

35Goals scored (season)41
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
40Goals conceded (season)30
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
3.57Average goals per game3.23
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
10Goals scored (last 5)8
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
9Goals conceded (last 5)2
Toronto IIChattanooga FC

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal91%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
57%2 goals50%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
19%3 goals27%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
10%4 goals18%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal68%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
52%2 goals36%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
33%3 goals14%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
14%4 goals14%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time23%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
14%BTTS in both halves5%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
29%Scored in both halves32%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
80%BTTS - last 540%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
52%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga FC is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.52 pts / game - Toronto II · 1.77 pts / game - Chattanooga FC

Toronto II - half-time state
38% leading38% draw24% trailing
Chattanooga FC - half-time state
50% leading27% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.52Points per game (1st half)1.77
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
0.81Goals scored (1st half)1
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.45
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
62%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
48%No goal before half-time36%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.9Points per game (2nd half)1.45
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
1.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.91
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
2.29Average goals (2nd half)1.77
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
29%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC
48%No goal after half-time41%
Toronto IIChattanooga FC

Toronto II - second-half results

19% W33% D48% L
32
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.9

Allows 0.9 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Chattanooga FC - second-half results

41% W23% D36% L
39
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Toronto II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.00
Goals scored / game1.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.81.0
Average goals per game2.01.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Chattanooga FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.401.60
Goals scored / game1.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.2
Average goals per game1.20.8
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+4+2
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Toronto II
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
7
3
16-30
7
5
31-45
4
9
46-60
6
6
61-75
8
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Chattanooga FC
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
5
4
16-30
11
3
31-45
8
7
46-60
5
8
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.40
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Toronto II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Chattanooga FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Toronto IILigaChattanooga FC
Average goals per game▲ 3.573.24• 3.23
Both teams scored• 62%61%▼ 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 76%66%▼ 55%
Clean sheets▼ 19%22%▲ 32%
Goal before half-time▼ 71%75%▲ 77%
Goal after half-time▼ 81%83%▲ 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.24
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / game
1.40
Away goals / game
+31%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defensive advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Toronto IISubstitutionOn: Damar Dixon O'NeillOff: Fletcher Bank
  2. Chattanooga FCSubstitutionOn: Anthony García EspinozaOff: Daniel Mangarov
  3. Chattanooga FCSubstitutionOn: Isaiah JonesOff: Tate Boswell Robertson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Toronto II's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Chattanooga FC. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Chattanooga FC
1 : 2
Toronto FC II USL
Toronto FC II USL
1 : 2
Chattanooga FC

FAQ

What was the result of Toronto II vs Chattanooga FC?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Toronto II 2:2 Chattanooga FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Toronto II and Chattanooga FC?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Toronto II won 1, Chattanooga FC won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Toronto II vs Chattanooga FC?

Toronto II score 1.67 goals per game on average and Chattanooga FC 1.86. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Toronto II's matches and 59% of Chattanooga FC's.

What form are Toronto II and Chattanooga FC in?

Over the last 5 games Toronto II have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Chattanooga FC 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Toronto II vs Chattanooga FC?

The statistical background for Toronto II vs Chattanooga FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.