Toronto vs Colorado Rapids: match statistics
Toronto vs Colorado Rapids: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Toronto played against Colorado Rapids in MLS (United States). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Recent form
Toronto has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Colorado Rapids has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Toronto scores 1.20 goals per game and allows 1.60. Colorado Rapids scores 2.20 and allows 1.40. Games in this league average 3.03 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 60% of Toronto's games and 60% of Colorado Rapids's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 60%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Colorado Rapids has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.25 per game. Toronto takes 10.4 shots per game, while Colorado Rapids takes 13.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Toronto leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Colorado Rapids leads at halftime in 60% and scores 1.20 after halftime.
When the teams score
Toronto's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). For Colorado Rapids, it is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS games average 3.03 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1). Toronto averages 1.5 goals scored and concedes only 1.0 at home, while Colorado on the road scores 1.67 and concedes 2.0 — roughly a 1.0-goal defensive advantage for the hosts. Toronto averages 12 shots per home match, including 6.5 on target, versus Rapids’ 11 shots and 4.67 on target away; additionally, average xG is 1.43 for Toronto versus 1.26 for the visitors, indicating higher quality chances despite lower possession (39% vs 55%). The hosts have not yet had a match without scoring at home (clean-sheet-less rate 0%), whereas Colorado failed to score in 33% of away games, increasing the likelihood Toronto will find the net at least once. Although Rapids have a better recent form over the last 5 matches (1.8 points vs Toronto’s 1.4) and a higher shot conversion (15% vs 13%), their 67% share of away losses and an average of 2.0 goals conceded demonstrate defensive instability. Overall, the home defensive edge, greater number of on-target shots (6.5 vs 4.67) and unbeaten home record (0% losses) make a Toronto victory the most probable outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates: Toronto 50% and Colorado 67%, and in the last 5 matches both record 60% BTTS, indicating a tendency toward Goal/Goal games. Toronto scores 3.0 goals seasonally (xG_for 1.95), but only 1.2 in the last 5, while Colorado has 1.67 goals seasonally (xG_for 1.26) and 2.2 in the last 5, so Colorado has been more effective offensively recently. Defensively Toronto concedes only 0.5 goals seasonally, but 1.6 in the last 5, and Colorado concedes 2.0 seasonally and 1.4 in the last 5, which together indicate increased susceptibility to goals lately. Additionally Toronto averages 7.5 shots on target versus Colorado's 4.67, and the league average BTTS is 51%, confirming the match is likely to be open. Considering the seasonal BTTS 50%/67%, the recent 60% for both teams, and the above xG and shooting stats, I price BTTS at 68% (yes) vs 32% (no) and recommend the pick: yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I back Over 1.5 as the best option: both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals this season, and the league average is 3.03 goals per match. xG is 1.95 for Toronto and 1.26 for Colorado (total 3.21), which suggests roughly 3.2 expected goals and supports a minimum-2-goal scenario. Toronto averages 17.5 shots and 7.5 on target per match (conversion 17%), while Colorado has 11.0 shots and 4.67 on target (conversion 15%), so the home side clearly creates more chances. I rate Over 2.5 at about 65% because seasonally Over 2.5 is 50% for Toronto and 67% for Colorado, and in the last 5 matches both teams had 60% of games with over 2.5 goals. Over 3.5 is riskier (approx. 38%) — despite the seasonal 50%/67% figures, the combined xG 3.21 and the recent 5-match xG (1.25 for Toronto, 1.53 for Colorado) indicate exceeding 3.5 goals is less likely.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Toronto has a clear offensive edge: season goals per game 3.0 versus Colorado’s 1.67, and xG 1.95 versus 1.26, indicating higher-quality created chances. The home side led at the break in 2 of 2 matches (100%), averaging 1.0 goals at half and conceding none (0.0), while Colorado led at the break in only 33% and concedes on average 1.33 goals before the interval. Toronto has a 100% home win rate and averages 3.0 points per home match, versus Colorado’s 33% win rate and 1.0 point average; additionally the hosts average 7.5 shots on target versus Colorado’s 4.67 and have a higher conversion rate of 17% versus 15%. On this basis the 1/1 (Half-Time/Full-Time: home leading at the break and winning) scenario is the strongest signal and I assign it 48% probability; realistic but weaker alternatives are X/1 at 15% and 1/X at 9%. Comebacks by Colorado are much less likely (2/1 2%) as is the away side holding their lead to the end (2/2 5%), given that Colorado concedes 2.0 goals per season on average and has the lower xG of 1.26.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Toronto | Colorado Rapids | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Colorado Rapids is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Toronto · 1.8 pts / game - Colorado Rapids
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Colorado Rapids is 83% better for: goals scored per game.
1.2 goals / game - Toronto · 2.2 goals / game - Colorado Rapids
Colorado Rapids is 14% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.6 goals / game - Toronto · 1.4 goals / game - Colorado Rapids
Toronto scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while Colorado Rapids keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).
Colorado Rapids scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while Toronto keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Toronto
Over / Under - Colorado Rapids
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Colorado Rapids is 125% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.8 pts / game - Toronto · 1.8 pts / game - Colorado Rapids
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Toronto - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Colorado Rapids - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Toronto
Colorado Rapids
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Toronto | Liga | Colorado Rapids | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.80 | 3.03 | ▲ 3.60 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 51% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 60% | 59% | • 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 28% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 73% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | • 80% | 81% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Toronto vs Colorado Rapids?
The MLS match finished Toronto 3:2 Colorado Rapids. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Toronto vs Colorado Rapids?
Toronto score 1.20 goals per game on average and Colorado Rapids 2.20. The MLS average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Toronto's matches and 60% of Colorado Rapids's.
What form are Toronto and Colorado Rapids in?
Over the last 5 games Toronto have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Colorado Rapids 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Toronto vs Colorado Rapids?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


