Torpedo Kutaisi vs Dinamo Tbilisi: match statistics
Torpedo Kutaisi vs Dinamo Tbilisi: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Torpedo Kutaisi played against Dinamo Tbilisi in Erovnuli Liga (Georgia). The game was played on September 6, 2026. Venue: Ramaz Shengelias Sakhelobis Stadioni. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Torpedo Kutaisi has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Dinamo Tbilisi has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Torpedo Kutaisi scores 1.57 goals per game and allows 1.17. Dinamo Tbilisi scores 1.59 and allows 1.18. Games in this league average 2.62 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of Torpedo Kutaisi's games and 64% of Dinamo Tbilisi's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 64%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Dinamo Tbilisi has the higher season xG average, 1.78 to 1.46 per game. Torpedo Kutaisi takes 11.7 shots per game, while Dinamo Tbilisi takes 14.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Torpedo Kutaisi leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 1.04 goals per game after halftime. Dinamo Tbilisi leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.73 after halftime.
When the teams score
Torpedo Kutaisi's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Dinamo Tbilisi, it is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Erovnuli Liga games average 2.62 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 3 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Dinamo Tbilisi sit 2nd, while Torpedo Kutaisi are sixth, and the visitors have recorded 10 wins this season compared to the hosts’ 8. Away from home, Dinamo average 1.80 goals and create chances worth 1.86 xG per match, clearly above Torpedo’s 1.54 xG at home. The visitors also register more shots, 15.2 compared to 12.17, and test the opposition goalkeeper more accurately, averaging 5.7 shots on target per game versus Torpedo’s 4.5. However, the hosts are in poor current form: they have collected just 4 points in their last five matches and conceded 12 goals, while Dinamo have taken 6 points over the same period. Torpedo can be dangerous at home, where they score 1.75 goals per match, but Dinamo’s away defense concedes just 1.00 goal, and only 10% of such matches have ended in defeat, which strongly favors the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS - Yes is more likely, as both teams have regularly been involved in matches with goals at both ends this season: Torpedo has recorded this outcome in 58% of matches, while Dinamo has done so in as many as 70%. Both sides create plenty of chances, as reflected by average xG figures of 1.72 for the hosts and 1.86 for the visitors, along with 4.83 and 5.70 shots on target per match, respectively. Their last five outings also point to an open game: Torpedo conceded an average of 2.4 goals, while Dinamo conceded 2.6, with BTTS standing at 60% for each side. Dinamo's defensive advantage is limited because, despite keeping a clean sheet in 30% of matches, their opponent averages 1.72 xG, while Torpedo keeps a clean sheet in only 17% of games. A scenario with goals from both teams is therefore stronger than the BTTS - No option, in which at least one side fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The attacking profile of both teams points to an open game: Torpedo’s average xG is 1.72, while Dinamo’s stands at 1.86. The visitors average 15.2 shots and 5.7 shots on target per match, while the hosts respond with 14.0 attempts and 4.83 shots on target. In their last five matches, Torpedo conceded an average of 2.4 goals, while Dinamo conceded as many as 2.6, with both teams going Over 2.5 goals in 60% and 80% of those games, respectively. The Over 1.5 goals line offers the greatest edge, as it was covered in 75% of Torpedo’s matches and 70% of Dinamo’s matches throughout the season, while the projected total of 3.03 goals is clearly above this threshold.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Torpedo have a case for making the better start: in their last five matches, they led at the break in 40% of cases, while Dinamo were behind at half-time as often as 60% of the time, scoring only 0.4 goals on average in those first halves. The hosts average 0.83 goals before the break, while the visitors concede 0.70 during this phase, supporting the scenario of a Torpedo lead. After the interval, however, Dinamo remain dangerous, averaging 0.90 goals scored and just 0.30 conceded, so the risk of a turnaround remains significant. Nevertheless, Torpedo have home advantage, and their xG stands at 1.72 compared with Dinamo’s average xG conceded of 1.32; therefore, the most likely outcome remains a Torpedo lead at half-time followed by a home win at full-time. This selection is also supported by the fact that Dinamo have lost only 10% of their matches this season, meaning the distribution remains relatively balanced and the 1/1 pick has a moderate rather than dominant edge.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Torpedo Kutaisi | Dinamo Tbilisi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Dinamo Tbilisi is 140% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Torpedo Kutaisi · 2.4 pts / game - Dinamo Tbilisi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Torpedo Kutaisi scores in 74% of games (17 of 23 games), while Dinamo Tbilisi keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 games).
Dinamo Tbilisi scores in 68% of games (15 of 22 games), while Torpedo Kutaisi keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Torpedo Kutaisi
Over / Under - Dinamo Tbilisi
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Dinamo Tbilisi is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.09 pts / game - Torpedo Kutaisi · 1.27 pts / game - Dinamo Tbilisi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Torpedo Kutaisi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Dinamo Tbilisi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Torpedo Kutaisi
Dinamo Tbilisi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Erovnuli Liga).
Teams vs league
| Torpedo Kutaisi | Liga | Dinamo Tbilisi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.74 | 2.62 | ▲ 2.77 |
| Both teams scored | • 57% | 56% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 54% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | • 26% | 26% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 67% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 74% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Torpedo Kutaisi's perspective: 2 wins, 3 draws and 1 loss against Dinamo Tbilisi. Games average 1.83 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Torpedo Kutaisi vs Dinamo Tbilisi?
The Erovnuli Liga match finished Torpedo Kutaisi 1:1 Dinamo Tbilisi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Torpedo Kutaisi and Dinamo Tbilisi?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Torpedo Kutaisi won 2, Dinamo Tbilisi won 1 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 1.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Torpedo Kutaisi vs Dinamo Tbilisi?
Torpedo Kutaisi score 1.57 goals per game on average and Dinamo Tbilisi 1.59. The Erovnuli Liga average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Torpedo Kutaisi's matches and 64% of Dinamo Tbilisi's.
What form are Torpedo Kutaisi and Dinamo Tbilisi in?
Over the last 5 games Torpedo Kutaisi have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Dinamo Tbilisi 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Torpedo Kutaisi vs Dinamo Tbilisi?
The statistical background for Torpedo Kutaisi vs Dinamo Tbilisi — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


