Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of September 06, 2026

TPS vs HJK: match statistics

TPS crest
TPS
1 : 0half-time 0:0
HJK crest
HJK

TPS vs HJK: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

TPS played against HJK in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on May 8, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

TPS has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. HJK has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

TPS scores 1.60 goals per game and allows 1.00. HJK scores 1.50 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 2.34 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 80% of TPS's games and 33% of HJK's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 33%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

TPS has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.27 per game. TPS takes 12.6 shots per game, while HJK takes 10.2.

First-half and second-half trends

TPS leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. HJK leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.83 after halftime.

When the teams score

TPS's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For HJK, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Veikkausliiga games average 2.34 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

TPS has a clear edge in chance creation: at home they average 12 shots and 4.67 on target with average xG 1.47, while HJK away records 7.67 shots, 3 on target and xG 1.01. Both teams average 1.67 goals scored and concede 0.67, but TPS generates about 56% more shots and 0.46 higher xG, translating into a greater number of high-quality chances. HJK compensates for fewer opportunities with higher efficiency – their shot conversion is 22% versus TPS’s 14% – so a lower volume of shots can still yield away goals. In the last 5 matches TPS scored 8 and conceded 5 (PPG 1.8), while HJK scored 6 and conceded 3 (PPG 1.6), giving a slight points advantage to the hosts. Based on this I predict a TPS win, assigning the hosts 55% probability, a draw 25% and an HJK away win 20%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

TPS at home averages 1.33 goals scored and concedes 0.33 per game season-to-date, but in the last 5 matches they score 1.6 and concede 1.0, resulting in BTTS - Yes in 80% of those fixtures. HJK seasonally scores 1.67 and concedes 0.67, with BTTS occurring in 67% of their season matches; in HJK’s last 5 games they record 1.2 goals and 0.6 conceded with 40% BTTS. From chance quality, TPS generates xG 1.53, which is close to the xG HJK concedes away (1.55), while HJK’s away xG is 1.01 versus xG against TPS 1.21. Additionally, HJK shows high shot conversion at 22% on an average of 7.67 shots. TPS averages 12.67 shots and 4.67 on target; combining this with HJK’s seasonal BTTS rate of 67% and TPS’s last-5 form (80% BTTS) the balance shifts toward Goal/Goal. Although TPS records seasonally 67% clean sheets at home, the strongest signal from the data indicates a 65% probability for BTTS - Yes and 35% for No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Averaging offensive and defensive xG yields expected goals of 1.54 for TPS (1.53 attacking xG) and 1.11 for HJK (1.01 attacking xG), totaling 2.65 goals (1.53 vs 1.55 and 1.01 vs 1.21 when accounting for opponent xG). With a mean of 2.65, the Poisson distribution implies roughly a 74% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~49% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~27% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Seasonal data confirm HJK’s propensity for matches with more than 1.5 goals (100% of matches), while TPS has 33% of matches over 1.5; both teams have 33% of matches over 2.5 and 0% over 3.5, which explains the moderate probability for Over 2.5 and low probability for Over 3.5. TPS averages 12.67 shots with 4.67 on target, HJK 7.67 with 3.0 on target, and HJK has higher shot conversion 22% vs 11% for TPS, so despite fewer shots HJK can convert chances into goals. Consequently, the strongest and most justified signal from the data is backing the Over line at 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

TPS led at the break in 2 of 3 matches (67%), while HJK led in 1 of 3 (33%), indicating a clear home advantage in the first 45 minutes. TPS posts a higher xG (1.53 vs 1.01) and averages more shots (12.67 vs 7.67) and shots on target (4.67 vs 3.0), confirming superior chance creation. The hosts concede only 0.33 goals per game on average and have 67% clean sheets this season, whereas HJK concedes 0.67 and has 33% clean sheets, so the risk of TPS surrendering a lead is relatively low. Although HJK has higher shot conversion (22% vs 11%) and scores more on average in second halves (1.0 vs 0.67), TPS’s higher xG and higher average points at half-time (2.0 for TPS vs 1.33 for HJK) favor the scenario of TPS leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

33Possession (%)67
TPSHJK
5Shots22
TPSHJK
4Shots on target4
TPSHJK
0.8xG2.31
TPSHJK
4Corners11
TPSHJK
27Dangerous attacks89
TPSHJK
13Fouls11
TPSHJK
2Cards1
TPSHJK

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.6Goals scored / game1.5
TPSHJK
1Goals allowed / game0.5
TPSHJK
49%Average possession49%
TPSHJK
4.8Shots on target / game3.83
TPSHJK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.6Shots per game10.17
TPSHJK
4.8Shots on target3.83
TPSHJK
12.7%Shot conversion14.8%
TPSHJK
49%Possession49%
TPSHJK
1.55xG for1.27
TPSHJK
1.26xG against1.38
TPSHJK

Shooting quality

TPS: BalancedHJK: Efficient finishing
TPSHJK
Accuracy (shots on target)38%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

TPS is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - TPS · 1.6 pts / game - HJK

TPS
DWWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
40% W60% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
WWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
HJK
LWDDW
Season result split
50% W33% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-1
1.83 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 away
1-2-0
WDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

TPS is 7% better for: goals scored per game.

1.6 goals / game - TPS · 1.5 goals / game - HJK

HJK is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - TPS · 0.5 goals / game - HJK

TPS scoring profile: very strong

TPS scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 meczów), while HJK keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 meczów).

HJK scoring profile: very strong

HJK scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).

8Goals scored (season)9
TPSHJK
5Goals conceded (season)3
TPSHJK
2.6Average goals per game2
TPSHJK
8Goals scored (last 5)6
TPSHJK
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
TPSHJK

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal83%
TPSHJK
60%2 goals33%
TPSHJK
0%3 goals33%
TPSHJK
0%4 goals0%
TPSHJK

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal50%
TPSHJK
20%2 goals0%
TPSHJK
0%3 goals0%
TPSHJK
0%4 goals0%
TPSHJK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time17%
TPSHJK
20%BTTS in both halves0%
TPSHJK
60%Scored in both halves33%
TPSHJK

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
TPSHJK
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
TPSHJK
80%BTTS - last 540%
TPSHJK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
TPSHJK
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
TPSHJK
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
TPSHJK

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
TPSHJK
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
TPSHJK
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
TPSHJK

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

TPS - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
HJK - half-time state
50% leading17% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per game (1st half)1.67
TPSHJK
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.67
TPSHJK
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
TPSHJK
1Average goals (1st half)1.17
TPSHJK
60%Clean sheet before half-time50%
TPSHJK
40%No goal before half-time33%
TPSHJK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.8Points per game (2nd half)2
TPSHJK
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
TPSHJK
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0
TPSHJK
1.6Average goals (2nd half)0.83
TPSHJK
40%Clean sheet after half-time100%
TPSHJK
0%No goal after half-time50%
TPSHJK

TPS - second-half results

40% W60% R0% P
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

HJK - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.5

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

TPS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.80
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game1.01.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
HJK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.80
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.0
Average goals per game1.20.6
1 goal100%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

TPS
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

HJK
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
1
31-45
3
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.30
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
83%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

TPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

HJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.88
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
39%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

TPSLigaHJK
Average goals per game 2.602.34 2.00
Both teams scored 80%50% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%38% 33%
Clean sheets 20%28% 50%
Goal before half-time 80%78% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%78% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.34
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / game
1.06
Away goals / game
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defensive advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TPSYellow cardPau Juvanteny Costa
  2. HJKSubstitutionOn: Teemu PukkiOff: Martin Kirilov
  3. TPSSubstitutionOn: Miika KauppilaOff: Elmer Vauhkonen
  4. HJKYellow cardPyry Mentu
  5. HJKSubstitutionOn: David EzehOff: Mads Borchers
  6. TPSSubstitutionOn: Akim SairinenOff: Eetu Turkki
  7. TPSYellow cardEetu Turkki

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of TPS vs HJK?

The Veikkausliiga match finished TPS 1:0 HJK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before TPS vs HJK?

TPS score 1.60 goals per game on average and HJK 1.50. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 80% of TPS's matches and 33% of HJK's.

What form are TPS and HJK in?

Over the last 5 games TPS have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and HJK 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TPS vs HJK?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for TPS vs HJK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.