Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 22 July 2026

TPS vs SJK: match statistics

TPS crest
TPS
2 : 0half-time 1:0
SJK crest
SJK

TPS vs SJK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

TPS play SJK in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match date is 18 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

TPS: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. SJK: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

TPS scores 1.25 and concedes 1.19 goals per match. SJK scores 1.13 and concedes 1.56. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: TPS 56%, SJK 56%. Over 2.5: TPS 50%, SJK 50%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

SJK has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.45. TPS: 11.7 shots per match, SJK: 13.3.

Match halves

TPS: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.69. SJK: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

TPS: 76-90+ (6 goals). SJK: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

TPS averages 2.0 goals scored and 1.0 conceded at home per match, registering on average 15 shots with 5 on target and an xG of 1.65, indicating solid chance creation. SJK away averages 0.0 goals scored and 3.0 conceded, with 7 shots (3 on target) and an xG of only 0.88, and have so far failed to score on the road. In the last 5 matches TPS scored 6 and conceded 8, averaging 1.4 points per game, while SJK scored 10 but conceded 13 and averages 1.2 points per game, which points to greater defensive instability for the visitors. Additionally, TPS has won all home matches (100% wins, 0% losses), whereas SJK has 100% losses and 0% wins away, which strongly favors the home side. Based on the comparison of average goals, xG (1.65 vs 0.88) and shot volume, I forecast a TPS victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
TPSSJK
11Shots9
TPSSJK
5Shots on target4
TPSSJK
1.56xG1.48
TPSSJK
8Corners4
TPSSJK
71Dangerous attacks87
TPSSJK
8Fouls15
TPSSJK
2Cards4
TPSSJK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.25Goals scored / match1.13
TPSSJK
1.19Goals conceded / match1.56
TPSSJK
47%Average possession51%
TPSSJK
4.38Shots on target / match4.75
TPSSJK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.69Shots per match13.25
TPSSJK
4.38Shots on target4.75
TPSSJK
10.7%Shot conversion8.5%
TPSSJK
47%Possession51%
TPSSJK
1.45xG for1.58
TPSSJK
1.59xG against1.49
TPSSJK

Shooting quality

TPS: BalancedSJK: Balanced
TPSSJK
Accuracy (shots on target)37%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

TPS is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - TPS · 1 pts / match - SJK

TPS
DWLWL
Season result split
38% W25% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-6
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
SJK
DDWLL
Season result split
19% W31% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-5-8
0.88 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

TPS is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

1.25 goals / match - TPS · 1.13 goals / match - SJK

TPS is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.19 goals / match - TPS · 1.56 goals / match - SJK

TPS scoring profile: very strong

TPS scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while SJK keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).

SJK scoring profile: strong

SJK scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).

20Goals scored (season)18
TPSSJK
19Goals conceded (season)25
TPSSJK
2.44Average goals in match2.69
TPSSJK
8Goals scored (last 5)6
TPSSJK
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
TPSSJK

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal63%
TPSSJK
31%2 goals31%
TPSSJK
13%3 goals19%
TPSSJK
0%4 goals0%
TPSSJK

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal88%
TPSSJK
38%2 goals50%
TPSSJK
13%3 goals19%
TPSSJK
0%4 goals0%
TPSSJK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time13%
TPSSJK
6%BTTS in both halves13%
TPSSJK
25%Scored in both halves25%
TPSSJK

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
TPSSJK
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
TPSSJK
60%BTTS - last 560%
TPSSJK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
TPSSJK
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
TPSSJK
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
TPSSJK

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
TPSSJK
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
TPSSJK
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
TPSSJK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

SJK is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - TPS · 1.06 pts / match - SJK

TPS - half-time state
19% leading44% draw38% trailing
SJK - half-time state
25% leading31% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.06
TPSSJK
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.38
TPSSJK
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
TPSSJK
1.19Average goals (1st half)1.06
TPSSJK
56%Clean sheet before half-time44%
TPSSJK
56%No goal before half-time63%
TPSSJK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.25
TPSSJK
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
TPSSJK
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
TPSSJK
1.25Average goals (2nd half)1.63
TPSSJK
50%Clean sheet after half-time38%
TPSSJK
38%No goal after half-time50%
TPSSJK

TPS - second-half results

31% W44% R25% P
16
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SJK - second-half results

31% W31% R38% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

TPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match2.01.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
SJK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

TPS
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
7
31-45
5
2
46-60
0
5
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

SJK
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
1
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
2
12
46-60
2
0
61-75
8
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.56
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+56%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

TPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

SJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

TPSLigaSJK
Average goals in match 2.442.67 2.69
Both teams scored 56%51% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%47% 50%
Clean sheets 31%28% 13%
Goal before half-time 63%75% 81%
Goal after half-time 81%78% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: TPS 0 - 0 - 1 SJK. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of TPS vs SJK?

The Veikkausliiga match finished TPS 2:0 SJK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before TPS vs SJK?

TPS score 1.25 goals per game on average and SJK 1.13. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 56% of TPS's matches and 56% of SJK's.

What form are TPS and SJK in?

Over the last 5 games TPS have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and SJK 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TPS vs SJK?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.