Finland - VeikkausliigaVeritas StadionData current as of September 06, 2026

TPS vs VPS: match statistics

TPS crest
TPS
1 : 0half-time 0:0
VPS crest
VPS

TPS vs VPS: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

TPS played against VPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on May 30, 2026. Venue: Veritas Stadion. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

TPS has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. VPS has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

TPS scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 1.00. VPS scores 1.00 and allows 0.75. Games in this league average 2.34 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of TPS's games and 50% of VPS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 25%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 40% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

TPS has the higher season xG average, 1.34 to 1.33 per game. TPS takes 10.6 shots per game, while VPS takes 10.9.

First-half and second-half trends

TPS leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. VPS leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.25 after halftime.

When the teams score

TPS's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For VPS, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Veikkausliiga games average 2.34 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 40% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

TPS has strong home numbers: on average 1.5 goals scored and only 0.5 conceded per match, with a 75% win rate and 50% clean sheets. In the last 5 fixtures TPS scored 5 goals and averages 1.2 points per game (2 wins, 3 losses), while VPS in their last 5 matches scored 15 goals and average 2.2 points per game (3 wins, 2 draws). The hosts convert chances better — TPS averages 10.25 shots with 4.5 on target and has a 15% conversion rate at home, whereas VPS away average is 9 shots with 4 on target and only 6% efficiency plus 50% of away games without scoring. xG is similar (TPS 1.31 at home vs VPS 1.18 away), but the advantage goes to better finishing and the hosts’ stable defense (0.5 goals conceded), therefore I predict a TPS win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict BTTS - Yes — signals favor goals from both sides. TPS averages 1.5 goals at home this season and has 75% BTTS matches, while VPS averages 0.5 goals away and has 25% BTTS, producing mixed signals. However, the last 5 matches clearly favor goals — VPS scored 15 goals in the last 5 (3.0 avg) and has 60% BTTS in that period, and TPS scored 5 goals (1.0) and has 20% BTTS, so the visitors have a real scoring capability. xG supports a both-teams-to-score scenario: expected xG for TPS ≈1.34 (1.49 xG_for_home vs 1.18 xG_against_away) and for VPS ≈1.27 (1.18 xG_for_away vs 1.35 xG_against_home), both values >1.0. Although VPS has 50% clean sheets away and TPS has higher shooting accuracy (12% vs 6%) and more shots (12.75 vs 9.0), the combination of xG, shot volume and the visitors’ form favors BTTS (Goal/Goal).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project 1.34 expected goals for TPS and 1.27 for VPS, totaling 2.61 goals. Basis: xG values — TPS xG_for 1.49 and VPS xG_for 1.18, with xG_against 1.35 (TPS) and 1.18 (VPS); averaging pairs yields (1.49+1.18)/2=1.34 and (1.18+1.35)/2=1.27. Seasonally TPS at home has Over 1.5 in 75% of matches, while VPS away has only 25%, and the league average is 2.37 goals — this gives a strong signal for Over 1.5. I assess Over 2.5 as moderately likely: TPS has 50% Over 2.5 at home, VPS 0%, but VPS scored 15 goals in the last 5 matches (3.0 avg), and the recent xG sum for both teams is ~2.91, so I estimate ~58% chance for Over 2.5. Over 3.5 appears unlikely (seasonally 25% for home and 0% for away), therefore I recommend betting the Over line at 1.5 as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

TPS holds a clear statistical edge: the home side scores an average of 1.5 goals per match versus VPS’s 0.5 and posts an xG of 1.49 against 1.18, indicating greater attacking threat from TPS. At home TPS led at the break in 50% of matches, averaging 1.0 goals by halftime while conceding only 0.25, whereas VPS led at the break in only 25% of away fixtures. TPS also displays superior finishing efficiency (12% on 4.5 shots on target) compared to VPS (6% on 4.0 shots on target), and second-half goals average 1.25 for TPS versus 0.25 for VPS, increasing the hosts’ likelihood of extending a lead after the break. Additionally, TPS is unbeaten at home (0% home defeats) and has a 50% season win rate, while VPS has only a 25% away win rate; although the visitors led at halftime in 60% of their last five matches, the strongest signal from the data is the scenario of the home side leading at halftime and winning the match (HT/FT 1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

37Possession (%)63
TPSVPS
1Shots22
TPSVPS
1Shots on target9
TPSVPS
0.45xG2.68
TPSVPS
2Corners9
TPSVPS
41Dangerous attacks93
TPSVPS
15Fouls15
TPSVPS
3Cards1
TPSVPS

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.25Goals scored / game1
TPSVPS
1Goals allowed / game0.75
TPSVPS
47%Average possession42%
TPSVPS
4Shots on target / game4.25
TPSVPS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.63Shots per game10.88
TPSVPS
4Shots on target4.25
TPSVPS
11.8%Shot conversion9.2%
TPSVPS
47%Possession42%
TPSVPS
1.34xG for1.33
TPSVPS
1.48xG against1.26
TPSVPS

Shooting quality

TPS: BalancedVPS: Balanced
TPSVPS
Accuracy (shots on target)38%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

VPS is 120% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - TPS · 2.2 pts / game - VPS

TPS
DDWLL
Season result split
38% W38% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-2
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
VPS
WWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
38% W50% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-1
1.63 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-1
Last 5 away
1-2-1
DLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

TPS is 25% better for: goals scored per game.

1.25 goals / game - TPS · 1 goals / game - VPS

VPS is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - TPS · 0.75 goals / game - VPS

TPS scoring profile: very strong

TPS scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 meczów), while VPS keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 meczów).

VPS scoring profile: strong

VPS scores in 63% of games (5 of 8 meczów), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 meczów).

10Goals scored (season)8
TPSVPS
8Goals conceded (season)6
TPSVPS
2.25Average goals per game1.75
TPSVPS
5Goals scored (last 5)8
TPSVPS
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
TPSVPS

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal63%
TPSVPS
38%2 goals25%
TPSVPS
0%3 goals13%
TPSVPS
0%4 goals0%
TPSVPS

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal63%
TPSVPS
25%2 goals13%
TPSVPS
0%3 goals0%
TPSVPS
0%4 goals0%
TPSVPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time13%
TPSVPS
13%BTTS in both halves0%
TPSVPS
38%Scored in both halves0%
TPSVPS

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
TPSVPS
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
TPSVPS
60%BTTS - last 580%
TPSVPS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
TPSVPS
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
TPSVPS
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
TPSVPS

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
TPSVPS
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
TPSVPS
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
TPSVPS

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

VPS is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / game - TPS · 1.63 pts / game - VPS

TPS - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
VPS - half-time state
38% leading50% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per game (1st half)1.63
TPSVPS
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.75
TPSVPS
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
TPSVPS
1Average goals (1st half)1
TPSVPS
63%Clean sheet before half-time75%
TPSVPS
50%No goal before half-time50%
TPSVPS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.63Points per game (2nd half)0.88
TPSVPS
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
TPSVPS
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
TPSVPS
1.25Average goals (2nd half)0.75
TPSVPS
50%Clean sheet after half-time63%
TPSVPS
25%No goal after half-time88%
TPSVPS

TPS - second-half results

38% W50% R13% P
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

VPS - second-half results

13% W50% R38% P
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

TPS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.20
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.01.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
VPS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.00
Goals scored / game1.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game1.61.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+4-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

TPS
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
2
3
31-45
3
2
46-60
0
2
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

VPS
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
3
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

TPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

VPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

TPSLigaVPS
Average goals per game 2.252.34 1.75
Both teams scored 63%49% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%40% 25%
Clean sheets 25%28% 38%
Goal before half-time 63%79% 63%
Goal after half-time 88%72% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.34
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / game
0.94
Away goals / game
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defensive advantage
+30%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TPSYellow cardTobias Karkulowski
  2. VPSYellow cardMiika Niemi
  3. TPSSubstitutionOn: Akim SairinenOff: Oscar Häggström
  4. TPSYellow cardMatej Hradecky
  5. VPSSubstitutionOn: Martti HaukiojaOff: Miika Niemi
  6. TPSYellow cardEetu Turkki

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of TPS vs VPS?

The Veikkausliiga match finished TPS 1:0 VPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before TPS vs VPS?

TPS score 1.25 goals per game on average and VPS 1.00. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 63% of TPS's matches and 50% of VPS's.

What form are TPS and VPS in?

Over the last 5 games TPS have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and VPS 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TPS vs VPS?

The statistical background for TPS vs VPS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.