Tractor Sazi vs Paykan: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tractor Sazi play Paykan in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match date is 14 December 2025 at 13:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Tractor Sazi: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Paykan: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tractor Sazi scores 1.23 and concedes 0.55 goals per match. Paykan scores 0.65 and concedes 0.91. League average: 1.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tractor Sazi 41%, Paykan 30%. Over 2.5: Tractor Sazi 36%, Paykan 17%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Tractor Sazi has higher xG: 1.81 vs 1.14. Tractor Sazi: 2.4 shots per match, Paykan: 3.6.

Match halves

Tractor Sazi: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.73. Paykan: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.22.

Goals by minute

Tractor Sazi: 76-90+ (8 goals). Paykan: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.79 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Tractor SaziPaykan
-1Shots-1
Tractor SaziPaykan
-1Shots on target-1
Tractor SaziPaykan
0xG0
Tractor SaziPaykan
-1Corners-1
Tractor SaziPaykan
0Dangerous attacks0
Tractor SaziPaykan
-1Fouls-1
Tractor SaziPaykan
3Cards3
Tractor SaziPaykan

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tractor SaziPaykan
1.23Goals scored / match0.65
Tractor SaziPaykan
0.55Goals conceded / match0.91
Tractor SaziPaykan
12%Average possession24%
Tractor SaziPaykan
0.82Shots on target / match0.78
Tractor SaziPaykan

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

2.36Shots per match3.65
Tractor SaziPaykan
0.82Shots on target0.78
Tractor SaziPaykan
51.9%Shot conversion17.9%
Tractor SaziPaykan
12%Possession24%
Tractor SaziPaykan
1.81xG for1.14
Tractor SaziPaykan
1.21xG against0.96
Tractor SaziPaykan

Shooting quality

Tractor Sazi: Counter-attackingPaykan: Counter-attacking
Tractor SaziPaykan
Accuracy (shots on target)35%21%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.770.31
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.500.83

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tractor Sazi is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Tractor Sazi · 1 pts / match - Paykan

Tractor Sazi
WWLDW
Season result split
41% W45% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-3
1.68 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-4-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Paykan
WLLDD
Season result split
22% W39% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-9-9
1.04 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tractor Sazi is 89% better for: goals scored per match.

1.23 goals / match - Tractor Sazi · 0.65 goals / match - Paykan

Tractor Sazi is 65% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.55 goals / match - Tractor Sazi · 0.91 goals / match - Paykan

Tractor Sazi scoring profile: mixed

Tractor Sazi scores in 59% of matches (13 of 22 matches), while Paykan keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 matches).

Paykan scoring profile: more difficult

Paykan scores in 52% of matches (12 of 23 matches), while Tractor Sazi keeps a clean sheet in 55% (12 of 22 matches).

27Goals scored (season)15
Tractor SaziPaykan
12Goals conceded (season)21
Tractor SaziPaykan
1.77Average goals in match1.57
Tractor SaziPaykan
5Goals scored (last 5)2
Tractor SaziPaykan
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
Tractor SaziPaykan

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal52%
Tractor SaziPaykan
27%2 goals13%
Tractor SaziPaykan
18%3 goals0%
Tractor SaziPaykan
14%4 goals0%
Tractor SaziPaykan

How often they concede at least...

45%1 goal61%
Tractor SaziPaykan
9%2 goals30%
Tractor SaziPaykan
0%3 goals0%
Tractor SaziPaykan
0%4 goals0%
Tractor SaziPaykan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time17%
Tractor SaziPaykan
0%BTTS in both halves4%
Tractor SaziPaykan
23%Scored in both halves4%
Tractor SaziPaykan

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
Tractor SaziPaykan
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Tractor SaziPaykan
40%BTTS - last 520%
Tractor SaziPaykan

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

41%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
Tractor SaziPaykan
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Tractor SaziPaykan
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Tractor SaziPaykan

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
Tractor SaziPaykan
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
Tractor SaziPaykan
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
Tractor SaziPaykan

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tractor Sazi is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.55 pts / match - Tractor Sazi · 1.35 pts / match - Paykan

Tractor Sazi - half-time state
27% leading73% draw0% trailing
Paykan - half-time state
26% leading57% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.55Points per match (1st half)1.35
Tractor SaziPaykan
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.43
Tractor SaziPaykan
0.18Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Tractor SaziPaykan
0.68Average goals (1st half)0.78
Tractor SaziPaykan
82%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Tractor SaziPaykan
59%No goal before half-time61%
Tractor SaziPaykan

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)0.74
Tractor SaziPaykan
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.22
Tractor SaziPaykan
0.36Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
Tractor SaziPaykan
1.09Average goals (2nd half)0.78
Tractor SaziPaykan
64%Clean sheet after half-time52%
Tractor SaziPaykan
59%No goal after half-time83%
Tractor SaziPaykan

Tractor Sazi - second-half results

27% W59% R14% P
34
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Paykan - second-half results

9% W48% R43% P
31
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 22%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tractor Sazi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Paykan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tractor Sazi
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
3
0
16-30
6
3
31-45
4
3
46-60
4
2
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Paykan
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
1
16-30
4
4
31-45
1
4
46-60
1
4
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
31%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tractor Sazi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.66
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Paykan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

Tractor SaziLigaPaykan
Average goals in match 1.771.79 1.57
Both teams scored 41%38% 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%28% 17%
Clean sheets 55%41% 39%
Goal before half-time 41%54% 57%
Goal after half-time 55%62% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.79
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.01
Home goals / match
0.79
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Tractor Sazi vs Paykan?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Tractor Sazi 2:1 Paykan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tractor Sazi vs Paykan?

Tractor Sazi score 1.23 goals per game on average and Paykan 0.65. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Tractor Sazi's matches and 30% of Paykan's.

What form are Tractor Sazi and Paykan in?

Over the last 5 games Tractor Sazi have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Paykan 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tractor Sazi vs Paykan?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.