TransINVEST Vilnius vs Banga: match statistics
TransINVEST Vilnius showcases impressive home form with a 50% win rate and zero defeats at their own stadium, recording an average of 2.5 goals per match and a favorable xG balance (2.08 to 0.94). The hosts stand out with high efficiency (14% shot conversion) and possession dominance (51%), while their offense has scored as many as 14 goals in their last five matches. Banga, despite a solid position in the table, struggles on the road - a 50% loss rate, averaging just 1 goal per match, and failing to score in 50% of their games. The significant difference in xG values in favor of the hosts (2.08 vs 1.53) and their advantage in offensive statistics point towards a TransINVEST victory. Considering all factors, the hosts have a clear advantage, although Banga's experience in fighting for top spots means a more tightly contested scenario cannot be ruled out.
TransINVEST Vilnius vs Banga: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
TransINVEST Vilnius played against Banga in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on March 11, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
TransINVEST Vilnius has 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.33 points per game. Banga has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
TransINVEST Vilnius scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 1.33. Banga scores 2.33 and allows 0.33. Games in this league average 2.56 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of TransINVEST Vilnius's games and 0% of Banga's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 33%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
TransINVEST Vilnius has the higher season xG average, 1.94 to 1.49 per game. TransINVEST Vilnius takes 16.0 shots per game, while Banga takes 13.7.
First-half and second-half trends
TransINVEST Vilnius leads at halftime in 67% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Banga leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
TransINVEST Vilnius's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). For Banga, it is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
A Lyga games average 2.56 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
TransINVEST Vilnius showcases impressive home form with a 50% win rate and zero defeats at their own stadium, recording an average of 2.5 goals per match and a favorable xG balance (2.08 to 0.94). The hosts stand out with high efficiency (14% shot conversion) and possession dominance (51%), while their offense has scored as many as 14 goals in their last five matches. Banga, despite a solid position in the table, struggles on the road - a 50% loss rate, averaging just 1 goal per match, and failing to score in 50% of their games. The significant difference in xG values in favor of the hosts (2.08 vs 1.53) and their advantage in offensive statistics point towards a TransINVEST victory. Considering all factors, the hosts have a clear advantage, although Banga's experience in fighting for top spots means a more tightly contested scenario cannot be ruled out.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| TransINVEST Vilnius | Banga | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Banga is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.33 pts / game - TransINVEST Vilnius · 2 pts / game - Banga
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Banga is 40% better for: goals scored per game.
1.67 goals / game - TransINVEST Vilnius · 2.33 goals / game - Banga
Banga is 303% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.33 goals / game - TransINVEST Vilnius · 0.33 goals / game - Banga
TransINVEST Vilnius scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 meczów).
Banga scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while TransINVEST Vilnius keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - TransINVEST Vilnius
Over / Under - Banga
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
TransINVEST Vilnius is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - TransINVEST Vilnius · 1.33 pts / game - Banga
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
TransINVEST Vilnius - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Banga - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 33% |
| No goal | 33% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.33 | 2.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.7 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 100% |
| No goal | 67% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
TransINVEST Vilnius
Banga
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| TransINVEST Vilnius | Liga | Banga | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.56 | ▲ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 44% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 44% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | • 33% | 33% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 83% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 72% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of TransINVEST Vilnius vs Banga?
The A Lyga match finished TransINVEST Vilnius 1:0 Banga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before TransINVEST Vilnius vs Banga?
TransINVEST Vilnius score 1.67 goals per game on average and Banga 2.33. The A Lyga average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 33% of TransINVEST Vilnius's matches and 0% of Banga's.
What form are TransINVEST Vilnius and Banga in?
Over the last 5 games TransINVEST Vilnius have a 1-1-1 record (1.33 points per game) and Banga 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TransINVEST Vilnius vs Banga?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.