Lithuania - A LygaData current as of 23 July 2026

TransINVEST Vilnius vs Panevėžys: match statistics

TransINVEST Vilnius vs Panevėžys: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

TransINVEST Vilnius play Panevėžys in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match date is 12 April 2026 at 13:15. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

TransINVEST Vilnius: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Panevėžys: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

TransINVEST Vilnius scores 1.68 and concedes 1.27 goals per match. Panevėžys scores 0.95 and concedes 1.81. League average: 2.62 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: TransINVEST Vilnius 64%, Panevėžys 57%. Over 2.5: TransINVEST Vilnius 73%, Panevėžys 62%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

TransINVEST Vilnius has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.26. TransINVEST Vilnius: 12.4 shots per match, Panevėžys: 11.0.

Match halves

TransINVEST Vilnius: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.82. Panevėžys: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.38.

Goals by minute

TransINVEST Vilnius: 31-45+ (8 goals). Panevėžys: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A Lyga: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

TransINVEST Vilnius holds a clear advantage: they are 3rd in the table versus Panevėžys in 7th, and at home they average 1.5 goals scored while conceding only 0.5 per game. Chance quality favors the hosts — home xG for TransINVEST is 1.6 per match vs. 0.98 xG for the visitors away, and the hosts average 13.5 shots (4.25 on target) compared to Panevėžys’s 8 shots (3 on target). Conversion rate also supports the hosts: home conversion is 11% vs. 8% for the visitors, and TransINVEST have 75% clean sheets at home and remain unbeaten at their stadium, while Panevėžys concede 2.67 goals on average away and have only 33% clean sheets. Both teams have 4 goals in the last 5 matches and average 1.4 points per game in that period, but the visitors have conceded 7 goals in their last five fixtures versus 6 conceded by the hosts, underscoring Panevėžys’s defensive issues. Therefore I predict a home win with estimated probabilities: Home 65%, Draw 18%, Panevėžys 17%.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
19Shots10
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
5Shots on target5
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
2.07xG1.23
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
7Corners4
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
73Dangerous attacks34
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
-1Fouls-1
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
2Cards6
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
1.68Goals scored / match0.95
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
1.27Goals conceded / match1.81
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
48%Average possession47%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
4.18Shots on target / match3.76
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.45Shots per match11
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
4.18Shots on target3.76
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
13.5%Shot conversion8.7%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
48%Possession47%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
1.46xG for1.26
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
1.24xG against1.64
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

Shooting quality

TransINVEST Vilnius: Efficient finishingPanevėžys: Balanced
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
Accuracy (shots on target)34%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

TransINVEST Vilnius
LWDLL
Season result split
45% W23% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-7
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Panevėžys
LWLDL
Season result split
29% W19% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-11
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-8
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

TransINVEST Vilnius is 77% better for: goals scored per match.

1.68 goals / match - TransINVEST Vilnius · 0.95 goals / match - Panevėžys

TransINVEST Vilnius is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.27 goals / match - TransINVEST Vilnius · 1.81 goals / match - Panevėžys

TransINVEST Vilnius scoring profile: very strong

TransINVEST Vilnius scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).

Panevėžys scoring profile: strong

Panevėžys scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while TransINVEST Vilnius keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

37Goals scored (season)20
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
28Goals conceded (season)38
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
2.95Average goals in match2.76
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
6Goals scored (last 5)5
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
9Goals conceded (last 5)11
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal67%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
50%2 goals24%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
18%3 goals5%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
9%4 goals0%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal86%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
41%2 goals48%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
18%3 goals33%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
0%4 goals14%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
TransINVEST Vilnius - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 22 matches
49%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time24%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
5%BTTS in both halves10%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
36%Scored in both halves10%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

BTTS and goal count

59%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
80%BTTS - last 560%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

TransINVEST Vilnius is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.73 pts / match - TransINVEST Vilnius · 1.24 pts / match - Panevėžys

TransINVEST Vilnius - half-time state
45% leading36% draw18% trailing
Panevėžys - half-time state
33% leading24% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.73Points per match (1st half)1.24
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
0.86Goals scored (1st half)0.57
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.95
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
1.36Average goals (1st half)1.52
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
59%Clean sheet before half-time38%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
32%No goal before half-time57%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

After half-time (2nd half)

1.14Points per match (2nd half)0.95
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
0.82Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
1.59Average goals (2nd half)1.24
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
45%Clean sheet after half-time43%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
45%No goal after half-time67%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

TransINVEST Vilnius - second-half results

27% W32% R41% P
38
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Panevėžys - second-half results

19% W38% R43% P
26
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

TransINVEST Vilnius - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Panevėžys - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

TransINVEST Vilnius
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
8
6
31-45
6
4
46-60
8
5
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Panevėžys
ScoredConceded
2
8
0-15
3
5
16-30
7
7
31-45
3
5
46-60
0
5
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

TransINVEST Vilnius

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

Panevėžys

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

TransINVEST VilniusLigaPanevėžys
Average goals in match 2.952.62 2.76
Both teams scored 64%49% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%55% 62%
Clean sheets 32%32% 14%
Goal before half-time 82%69% 81%
Goal after half-time 82%76% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: TransINVEST Vilnius 1 - 0 - 0 Panevėžys. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of TransINVEST Vilnius vs Panevėžys?

The A Lyga match finished TransINVEST Vilnius 1:2 Panevėžys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before TransINVEST Vilnius vs Panevėžys?

TransINVEST Vilnius score 1.68 goals per game on average and Panevėžys 0.95. The A Lyga average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 64% of TransINVEST Vilnius's matches and 57% of Panevėžys's.

What form are TransINVEST Vilnius and Panevėžys in?

Over the last 5 games TransINVEST Vilnius have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Panevėžys 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TransINVEST Vilnius vs Panevėžys?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for TransINVEST Vilnius vs Panevėžys: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.